AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U vs Intel Xeon E-2414 Comparison

The Intel Xeon E-2414 and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U are both 4-core processors, but they target fundamentally different markets and deliver their performance in contrasting ways. Benchmark data shows the Xeon E-2414 wins every single head-to-head Cinebench test, with margins consistently hovering around 3.6% to 3.9% across both single-core and multi-core workloads. However, the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U counters with a substantial advantage in power efficiency, a 7 nm process node, and integrated graphics, making the choice between them a clear split between raw server-oriented compute and mobile versatility.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon E-2414 is the outright performance winner in every benchmark category recorded. Across all six Cinebench tests, it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U, with the largest margin being 3.9% in multi-core tests (Cinebench R15, R20, and R23) and the same 3.9% edge in Cinebench R23 single-core. The data shows a consistent pattern: the Xeon leads by 3.6% in Cinebench R15 single-core, 3.8% in R20 single-core, and 3.9% in all multi-core tests. This makes it the clear choice for workloads that rely on sustained CPU throughput, particularly in server or workstation environments where every bit of multi-threaded performance matters.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U wins in every category that the benchmark pack measures outside of raw CPU scores. It has a 15 W TDP versus the Xeon's 55 W, making it dramatically more power-efficient. It also features integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics, which the Xeon completely lacks, meaning the Ryzen can handle display output without a dedicated GPU. The Ryzen also supports DDR4 memory with a 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the Xeon requires DDR5 with a higher 76.8 GB/s bandwidth—a trade-off where the Xeon wins on speed but the Ryzen wins on platform cost and availability. The Ryzen's 8 threads versus the Xeon's 4 threads give it a theoretical advantage in heavily threaded scenarios, but benchmark results show that advantage does not translate into actual Cinebench wins.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from entirely different design philosophies. The Intel Xeon E-2414 is built on Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename) using a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry, with a die size of 163 mm². It belongs to the Xeon E-2400 series, a server/workstation lineup, and uses the Intel Socket 1700. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is based on Zen 3 (Cezanne-U codename) using a 7 nm process at TSMC, with a larger die size of 180 mm² and 10,700 million transistors. It is a mobile processor using AMD Socket FP6.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The Xeon provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The Ryzen offers 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. This gives the Xeon a considerable cache advantage, particularly in L2 and L3, which helps explain its consistent benchmark wins. The Xeon also supports ECC memory, a critical feature for server reliability, while the Ryzen does not. The Xeon has PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Ryzen has PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes, making the Xeon far superior for expansion and high-speed peripherals.

The Xeon has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, while the Ryzen has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The Xeon's higher boost clock (4.50 vs 4.10 GHz) likely contributes to its single-core wins, while its larger cache and higher TDP (55 W vs 15 W) allow it to sustain higher performance under load. The Ryzen's lower TDP is a direct consequence of its mobile design, prioritizing battery life and thermal efficiency over raw performance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data reveals a remarkably consistent performance gap. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Xeon scores 1012 against the Ryzen's 974, a 3.9% lead. In single-core, the Xeon scores 142 versus 137, a 3.6% margin. Moving to Cinebench R20, the Xeon leads 4219 to 4062 in multi-core (3.9%) and 595 to 573 in single-core (3.8%). In Cinebench R23, the Xeon scores 10046 versus 9673 in multi-core (3.9%) and 1418 versus 1365 in single-core (3.9%).

These margins are small but uniform. The Xeon wins every test by roughly the same percentage, suggesting its advantage comes from architectural efficiency (larger cache, higher boost clock) rather than any specific workload optimization. The Ryzen's extra threads (8 vs 4) do not help it close the gap in multi-core tests, indicating that the Xeon's per-core performance and cache hierarchy are more impactful than raw thread count in these Cinebench workloads.

The Ryzen does have one benchmark advantage not present in the head-to-head table: it has Geekbench scores (4525 multi-core, 1612 single-core) that the Xeon lacks entirely. This absence means the Xeon's performance profile is only partially characterized, and the Ryzen's Geekbench numbers suggest it may be competitive in other types of workloads. However, within the Cinebench suite that both share, the Xeon is unequivocally faster.

The Verdict

The data leads to a clear verdict: the Intel Xeon E-2414 is the superior processor for raw compute performance. It wins 6 out of 6 head-to-head benchmarks, with consistent 3.6% to 3.9% margins. Its 12 MB of L3 cache, 4.50 GHz boost clock, DDR5 memory support, and ECC capability make it the obvious choice for server and workstation deployments where reliability and throughput are paramount. The Xeon's launch MSRP is $225, and it sits at the 51st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2905.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is the better choice for mobile or power-constrained environments. Its 15 W TDP is a fraction of the Xeon's 55 W, it includes Radeon Vega 6 integrated graphics, and it uses a more advanced 7 nm process. Its average benchmark score of 2865 is only 1.4% lower than the Xeon's 2905, yet it achieves this with far less power draw. The Ryzen also has Geekbench scores that the Xeon cannot match, indicating it may hold up well in other applications. For users who need a capable processor with low power consumption and built-in graphics, the Ryzen is the data-backed pick.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2414 wins all three multi-core Cinebench tests: R15 (1012 vs 974), R20 (4219 vs 4062), and R23 (10046 vs 9673), each by a 3.9% margin.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Radeon Vega 6 integrated graphics. The Intel Xeon E-2414 has no integrated graphics, requiring a separate GPU for display output.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U has a 15 W TDP, while the Intel Xeon E-2414 has a 55 W TDP. The Ryzen is significantly more power-efficient.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the Intel Xeon E-2414 supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U does not have ECC support.

Q: How do their memory bandwidths compare?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2414 supports DDR5 with a 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U supports DDR4 with a 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Xeon has a 50% higher memory bandwidth.

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U has 8 threads (4 cores with SMT), while the Intel Xeon E-2414 has 4 threads (4 cores without SMT). Despite this, the Xeon wins all multi-core benchmarks.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E-2414 | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U |

|---|---|---|

| Series | Xeon E-2400 series | 5000 series |

| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |

| Threads | 4 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.60 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.10 GHz |

| TDP | 55 W | 15 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket FP6 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 3 |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-S | Cezanne-U |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not specified | 10,700 million |

| Die Size | 163 mm² | 180 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon Vega 6 |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Launch MSRP | $225 | Not specified |