AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U vs Intel Xeon E-2278GEL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear, if narrow, victory for the Intel Xeon E-2278GEL across every recorded Cinebench test. The Intel part wins all six head-to-head comparisons, though the margins are consistently slim, ranging from 5.6% to 5.8%. This is not a dominant performance gap; rather, it reflects a steady, repeatable advantage in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads.

In Cinebench R15, the Xeon E-2278GEL scores 1030 in multi-core against the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U's 974, a 5.7% lead. The single-core result is similar: 145 versus 137, a 5.8% advantage. Moving to Cinebench R20, the Intel chip posts 4292 multi-core and 605 single-core, while the AMD part scores 4062 and 573, respectively. Both deltas sit at 5.7% and 5.6%. The pattern holds in Cinebench R23, where the Xeon reaches 10220 multi-core and 1442 single-core, compared to the Ryzen's 9673 and 1365, again with 5.7% and 5.6% gaps.

These numbers indicate that the Xeon E-2278GEL offers a consistent, though modest, performance edge in CPU-bound rendering tasks. The Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is not far behind, but it does not win a single recorded benchmark in this comparison. The data shows a clean sweep for Intel, but the small deltas suggest that real-world differences would be perceptible only in sustained, heavily threaded workloads, not in casual use.

It is importantly the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U has additional Geekbench scores (4525 multi-core, 1612 single-core) that are not part of the head-to-head set, so they are not included in the delta calculations. The recorded Cinebench results are the only direct comparisons available, and they uniformly favor the Intel processor.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Xeon E-2278GEL is a Coffee Lake-S WS part built on Intel's 14 nm process, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is a Zen 3 Cezanne-U chip fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm node. This process gap is significant: the AMD chip uses a smaller, more modern manufacturing process, which typically enables higher efficiency and better transistor density.

The core counts differ sharply. The Xeon offers 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO provides 4 cores and 8 threads. Despite this 2x core advantage for Intel, the multi-core benchmark lead is only about 5.7%, which suggests that the Zen 3 architecture's per-core efficiency is substantial. The Ryzen 3 PRO also has a higher base clock (2.70 GHz versus 2.00 GHz) and boost clock (4.10 GHz versus 3.90 GHz), which helps it close the gap in single-thread tests, though it still trails slightly.

Cache configurations reveal another divergence. The Xeon has 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core, with 16 MB shared L3. The Ryzen 3 PRO has 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, but only 8 MB shared L3. The larger L3 on the Intel part likely benefits multi-threaded workloads that share data, while the Ryzen's larger per-core L2 helps its fewer cores operate more independently.

Memory support is similar in type (DDR4, dual-channel), but the bandwidth differs: the Xeon is rated at 42.7 GB/s, while the Ryzen 3 PRO reaches 51.2 GB/s. The AMD part also has a lower TDP of 15 watts, compared to the Xeon's 35 watts, which is a major efficiency advantage for mobile and compact systems. The Xeon supports ECC memory, the Ryzen does not. PCIe lanes also differ: Intel provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes, AMD offers Gen 3 with only 8 lanes.

The integrated graphics are not comparable in performance terms: the Xeon uses UHD Graphics P630, while the Ryzen 3 PRO features Radeon Vega 6. The Xeon's die size is 180 mm², and the Ryzen 3 PRO also lists a 180 mm² die size, though the AMD chip packs 10,700 million transistors, a figure not provided for the Intel part.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon E-2278GEL wins in every recorded Cinebench benchmark, making it the stronger choice for CPU-heavy rendering and multi-threaded productivity. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with 16 MB of shared L3 cache, give it a measurable edge in workloads that scale with thread count, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computation. The data shows a 5.7% lead in R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests, which is modest but consistent.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U does not win any head-to-head benchmark, but its strengths lie elsewhere. With a 15 W TDP, it is far more power-efficient, making it suited for thin-and-light laptops or fanless designs where thermal and battery constraints dominate. Its higher boost clock of 4.10 GHz and larger L2 cache per core (512 KB) suggest that lightly threaded, latency-sensitive tasks like web browsing or office applications may feel responsive, even if the Cinebench scores trail by a small margin. The Ryzen also has a higher memory bandwidth rating (51.2 GB/s), which could benefit memory-bound workloads despite the lower core count.

The Xeon is an end-of-life server/workstation part with a 35 W TDP, designed for stable, always-on operation with ECC memory. The Ryzen is an active mobile processor, aimed at portability and battery life. In short, the Xeon wins on raw multi-threaded throughput, while the Ryzen wins on efficiency and mobility, though it loses every recorded performance test.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2278GEL has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the performance difference in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Xeon scores 10220, while the Ryzen scores 9673, giving the Intel part a 5.7% lead.

Q: Does the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U win any benchmark in the head-to-head comparison?

A: No. The Xeon wins all six recorded Cinebench tests, with deltas between 5.6% and 5.8%.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2278GEL supports ECC memory; the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U does not.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Xeon has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Ryzen has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U has a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, compared to the Intel Xeon's 3.90 GHz.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E-2278GEL | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U |

|---------------|----------------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.90 GHz | 4.10 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 15 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | AMD Socket FP6 |

| Architecture | Coffee Lake | Zen 3 |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not listed | 10,700 million |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes | Gen 3, 8 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon Vega 6 |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2019-06-10 | 2022-04-18 |

| Launch MSRP | $519 | Not listed |

The Verdict

The data points to a clear choice for users who prioritize raw multi-threaded performance: the Intel Xeon E-2278GEL. It wins every recorded benchmark, offers double the cores and threads, and includes ECC memory support, which is critical for data integrity in workstation and server environments. Its 16 MB L3 cache and 16 PCIe lanes also support heavier expansion and shared-cache workloads. The Xeon's 35 W TDP is higher, but for a stationary workstation, that is a reasonable trade-off for the performance lead.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is the better pick for mobile or power-constrained systems. Its 15 W TDP is less than half of the Xeon's, making it suitable for laptops and compact devices where battery life and heat dissipation are paramount. It also has a higher boost clock, larger per-core L2 cache, and greater memory bandwidth, which can help in single-threaded or memory-sensitive tasks, even if the Cinebench scores are slightly lower. However, it lacks ECC support and has fewer cores, so it is not designed for server-grade reliability.

The verdict is straightforward: choose the Xeon E-2278GEL for maximum CPU throughput and ECC reliability; choose the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U for efficiency and portability. The performance gap between them is small, but the architectural and feature differences define their appropriate use cases.