AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE vs Intel Core i3-14100T Comparison

The Intel Core i3-14100T and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE are both 35-watt, 4-core, 8-thread desktop processors, yet the benchmark data reveals two very distinct performance personalities. The Intel part dominates the Cinebench suite and several Passmark tests, while the AMD chip carves out a niche in specific workloads like encryption and integer math. The head-to-head results show a clear overall winner in volume, with Intel taking 13 of the 17 recorded benchmarks, but the margins and specific test victories tell a more nuanced story about workload suitability.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the data is Intel’s near-sweep of the Cinebench family. Across all six Cinebench tests, the i3-14100T holds a consistent lead of roughly 7% over the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel scores 11,612 against AMD’s 10,846, a 7.1% advantage. Single-core results mirror this: R23 single-core shows 1,639 for Intel versus 1,531 for AMD, again a 7.1% delta. The consistency is remarkable—every Cinebench test, from R15 to R23, lands within a narrow 7.0% to 7.1% band. This suggests a fundamental architecture-level edge in rendering workloads rather than a clock-speed fluke.

Beyond Cinebench, Intel’s wins grow more dramatic in specific Passmark subtests. The floating-point math test is a rout: Intel scores 31,379 against AMD’s 24,115, a 30.1% gap. The physics test is even more lopsided, with Intel at 973 versus AMD’s 552, a 76.3% advantage. Prime number finding shows Intel at 56 versus AMD’s 31, an 80.6% delta—the largest single-test margin in the entire comparison. Single-thread performance also favors Intel decisively: 3,498 versus 3,089 on Passmark’s single-thread test, a 13.2% lead.

AMD’s four wins are narrower but reveal specialized strengths. The data encryption test is AMD’s best showing: 9,564 versus Intel’s 7,881, a 17.6% advantage. Integer math goes to AMD at 44,665 versus 40,292, a 9.8% lead. Random string sorting favors AMD by 9.7% (17,255 versus 15,579), and data compression is essentially a tie, with AMD edging ahead by just 0.2% (152,885 versus 152,636). The extended instructions test is also nearly dead even, with Intel ahead by only 0.4%. These results suggest AMD’s Zen 3 architecture handles certain data manipulation tasks more efficiently, even while lagging in raw compute throughput.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmarks overall?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100T wins 13 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE wins 4.

Q: How big is Intel’s lead in Cinebench multi-core tests?

A: Intel leads by 7.1% in Cinebench R20 multi-core (4,877 vs 4,555) and Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,612 vs 10,846). The R15 multi-core margin is 7%.

Q: Where does AMD perform best relative to Intel?

A: AMD’s largest win is in Passmark data encryption, where it scores 9,564 versus Intel’s 7,881, a 17.6% advantage. It also wins integer math (44,665 vs 40,292) and random string sorting (17,255 vs 15,579).

Q: Is there any test where the two processors are nearly identical?

A: Yes, Passmark data compression shows AMD at 152,885 and Intel at 152,636, a difference of only 0.2%. The extended instructions test is similarly close, with Intel ahead by just 0.4% (10,414 vs 10,368).

Q: What is the largest performance gap in either direction?

A: Intel’s 80.6% advantage in Passmark find prime numbers (56 vs 31) is the largest margin. Intel also leads by 76.3% in the physics test (973 vs 552).

Q: How do the two compare on single-threaded Passmark performance?

A: Intel scores 3,498 versus AMD’s 3,089, a 13.2% lead. This is consistent with Intel’s single-core Cinebench wins, which range from 7.0% to 7.1%.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from fundamentally different design philosophies. Intel’s Core i3-14100T is built on Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry, with a die size of 163 mm². AMD’s Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE uses Zen 3 architecture (Cezanne codename) fabricated by TSMC on a 7 nm node, with a larger 180 mm² die and 10,700 million transistors on board. The process node gap—10 nm versus 7 nm—partially explains why AMD fits more transistors into a larger physical area.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, plus a 12 MB shared L3 cache. AMD provides 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, with only 8 MB of L3 total. Intel’s larger per-core L2 and 50% larger L3 pool give it a structural advantage in workloads that benefit from fast access to repeated data—likely contributing to its Cinebench dominance. AMD’s smaller cache footprint appears offset by its 7 nm efficiency and Zen 3’s IPC improvements in specific instruction paths.

Memory support diverges sharply. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, giving platform flexibility. AMD is limited to DDR4 only, though it lists a specific memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, a figure Intel does not provide. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also differs: Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while AMD provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes—a significant generational gap for storage or GPU expansion.

Integrated graphics differ as well. Intel pairs its chip with UHD Graphics 730, while AMD includes Radeon Vega 6. Neither is a gaming powerhouse, but the AMD part’s Vega architecture has a track record of stronger iGPU compute in legacy titles, though the benchmark data here does not include graphics tests.

Specification Differences

The core counts are identical—4 cores, 8 threads—but the clock speeds tell a different story. Intel’s base clock is 2.70 GHz with a boost of 4.40 GHz. AMD starts higher at 3.60 GHz base but boosts to only 4.20 GHz. Intel’s higher boost clock likely drives its single-thread wins, while AMD’s higher base clock helps in sustained all-core loads, though the data shows Intel still wins multi-core tests.

Both are 35 W TDP parts, locked multipliers, and designed for desktop sockets. Intel uses Socket 1700; AMD uses Socket AM4. Intel’s release date is January 7, 2024, while AMD’s is September 4, 2024—a nine-month gap that puts AMD at a time disadvantage. Intel carries a launch MSRP of $134; AMD has no listed launch MSRP in the data.

The average benchmark scores are close: Intel at 17,648 versus AMD at 17,482, a 0.9% difference. Both sit at the 71st percentile among all CPUs, indicating they are statistically equivalent in overall performance ranking. Intel’s nearest rivals include the Core i3-13100F (delta 0%) and Ryzen 3 8300GE (delta 0.2%), while AMD’s nearest rivals include the Ryzen 5 4600G (delta -0.1%) and Core 7 150U (delta 0.5%). This places both chips in a dense mid-range cluster where small margins separate many competitors.

Where Each One Wins

Intel’s wins are broad and compute-heavy. The Cinebench sweep, floating-point math (30.1% lead), physics (76.3% lead), and prime number finding (80.6% lead) point to workloads that stress raw arithmetic throughput and cache-sensitive rendering. This makes the i3-14100T the better choice for CPU-based rendering tasks, scientific calculations, or any application that leans on floating-point operations. The 13.2% single-thread advantage also favors snappy desktop response and lightly-threaded legacy software.

AMD’s wins are narrower but specific. The 17.6% encryption lead and 9.8% integer math advantage suggest the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE handles cryptography, hashing, and certain database or compression workloads more efficiently. Random string sorting (9.7% lead) reinforces this pattern—AMD appears optimized for data organization and manipulation tasks. The near-tie in data compression (0.2% delta) means either chip performs acceptably there, but AMD’s edge is real.

The physics test is particularly telling: Intel’s 973 versus AMD’s 552 is a massive gap that likely reflects differences in instruction scheduling or cache behavior under simulation-type loads. For users running physics simulations or similar structured math, Intel is the clear pick. Conversely, for file encryption, secure communications, or integer-heavy data processing, AMD holds the advantage.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear but nuanced recommendation. For general-purpose computing, rendering, and single-threaded responsiveness, the Intel Core i3-14100T is the stronger processor—its 13 benchmark wins, consistent 7% Cinebench lead, and 13.2% single-thread margin make it the default choice for most users. The 80.6% prime number and 76.3% physics wins are decisive for any workload involving large-scale mathematical computation.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE is the pick for specialized data workloads. Its 17.6% encryption advantage and 9.8% integer math lead are substantial for security-focused applications. The 9.7% random string sorting win suggests better performance in text processing or data indexing tasks. Users who prioritize these specific operations—rather than broad rendering or physics—should favor AMD.

Both chips land at the same 71st percentile and have nearly identical average scores (17,648 vs 17,482), so the choice comes down to workload profile. Intel wins the volume battle; AMD wins the targeted battles. For a balanced system, Intel’s DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 offer future-proofing that AMD’s DDR4 and PCIe Gen 3 cannot match. For a security appliance or data-crunching box, AMD’s encryption and integer strengths justify its selection despite the overall benchmark deficit.