AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE vs Intel Core i3-13100F Comparison

The Intel Core i3-13100F and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE are both 4-core, 8-thread desktop processors, but the benchmark data shows a decisive performance split. The Intel chip wins 14 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons, often by double-digit margins, while the AMD part takes just three wins in specific, narrower workloads. This is not a close contest in raw throughput; the Core i3-13100F is the faster processor for the vast majority of tasks, though the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE counters with a lower power envelope and a few specialized strengths.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern is the consistency of Intel’s victory across rendering and general compute tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core i3-13100F scores 12458 against the Ryzen’s 10846, a 14.9% advantage. The single-core result tells the same story: 1758 versus 1531, a 14.8% edge. This gap repeats almost identically across all Cinebench versions — R15 multi-core (1255 vs 1093, 14.8%), R15 single-core (177 vs 154, 14.9%), R20 multi-core (5232 vs 4555, 14.9%), and R20 single-core (738 vs 643, 14.8%). The near-constant 14.8-14.9% delta in every Cinebench test suggests a fundamental architectural advantage in clock speed and IPC rather than workload-specific quirks.

The PassMark suite amplifies this in several areas. The largest single win for Intel comes in PassMark physics, where it scores 1055 versus 552 — a massive 91.1% lead. Similarly, PassMark find prime numbers shows Intel at 61 against AMD’s 31, a 96.8% advantage. Floating-point math is another blowout: 33510 versus 24115, a 39% lead. These are not marginal differences; the Intel part is nearly twice as fast in physics simulations and prime-number finding, and more than a third faster in floating-point arithmetic.

Multi-threaded throughput also favors Intel decisively. PassMark multithread scores 14687 for Intel versus 12761 for AMD, a 15.1% lead. Data compression follows with 168043 against 152885 (9.9%), and extended instructions show 11407 versus 10368 (10%). Single-thread performance is equally one-sided: PassMark single thread scores 3609 for Intel versus 3089 for AMD, a 16.8% edge, matching the Cinebench single-core results.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE wins only three tests, and they are more niche. PassMark data encryption shows AMD ahead at 9564 versus 8496, an 11.2% margin. Integer math is a narrow win for AMD: 44665 versus 43038, a 3.6% lead. Random string sorting also goes to AMD at 17255 versus 16569, a 4% edge. These wins are real but isolated — they do not offset the scale of Intel’s dominance elsewhere.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-13100F is the clear winner for any workload that stresses raw compute, rendering, or physics simulation. Its Cinebench sweep across all three versions — R15, R20, and R23 — makes it the superior choice for 3D rendering, video encoding, and CPU-bound creative tasks. The 91.1% lead in PassMark physics and the 96.8% lead in prime-number finding also indicate strong performance in scientific computing and simulation workloads. The 39% advantage in floating-point math further cements its position for engineering and analytical applications.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE, by contrast, wins in three specific areas that point to different use cases. Its 11.2% lead in data encryption suggests it handles cryptographic workloads more efficiently — a relevant consideration for security-focused systems or encrypted storage. The 3.6% win in integer math is modest but indicates competitive general arithmetic, while the 4% lead in random string sorting points to slightly better performance in database-style operations or text processing.

However, the AMD part’s most compelling advantage is not in the benchmark scores but in its power profile. Its TDP is 35 watts versus Intel’s 58 watts, which means it generates less heat and requires less cooling. This makes it a better fit for compact or passively cooled systems where thermal headroom is limited, even if it loses on performance. The Ryzen also includes integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics, whereas the Core i3-13100F has no integrated graphics at all — a practical benefit for systems without a discrete GPU.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The Intel Core i3-13100F uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process fabricated by Intel, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE uses Zen 3 architecture on a 7 nm process from TSMC. The smaller process node gives AMD a potential efficiency edge, which is reflected in its lower 35 watt TDP versus Intel’s 58 watts.

Core and cache structures also differ significantly. Both have 4 cores and 8 threads, but Intel allocates a larger L1 cache at 80 KB per core versus AMD’s 64 KB per core. Intel’s L2 cache is also larger at 1.25 MB per core, more than double AMD’s 512 KB per core. The L3 cache favors Intel as well: 12 MB shared versus 8 MB on AMD. These cache advantages likely contribute to Intel’s strong single-thread and rendering performance.

Memory support diverges sharply. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, while the AMD chip is limited to DDR4 only. AMD does list a specific memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, but Intel does not provide a comparable figure in the data. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Intel chip — an important distinction for reliability-focused applications.

Platform connectivity differs as well. Intel uses Socket 1700 with PCIe Gen 5 and 20 lanes, while AMD uses Socket AM4 with PCIe Gen 3 and 16 lanes. The newer PCIe standard on Intel offers more bandwidth for future expansion. AMD’s integrated Radeon Vega 6 GPU is a notable feature since the Intel part has no integrated graphics, but Intel counters with a higher boost clock of 4.50 GHz versus AMD’s 4.20 GHz, and a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz versus 3.60 GHz — the AMD base clock is actually higher, but its boost is lower.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i3-13100F is the faster processor in nearly every measurable way. It leads by roughly 15% in all Cinebench multi-core and single-core tests, by 16.8% in PassMark single-thread, and by 15.1% in PassMark multithread. Its wins in physics (91.1%) and floating-point math (39%) are overwhelming. For any user prioritizing speed in rendering, simulation, or general productivity, the Intel chip is the clear choice.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE is not without merit, but its advantages are narrower and more specialized. Its 11.2% lead in data encryption and 4% lead in random string sorting are genuine, but they apply to niche workloads. Its 35 watt TDP makes it a better option for low-power or thermally constrained builds, and its integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics eliminate the need for a separate GPU in basic systems. The ECC memory support also gives it an edge for data-integrity-critical environments.

Ultimately, the choice depends on priorities. If raw performance is the goal, the Intel Core i3-13100F wins decisively. If power efficiency, integrated graphics, or ECC support matter more, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE offers those features at the cost of significant performance — roughly 15% slower in most tests and nearly half as fast in physics. The Intel chip’s 71st percentile ranking among all CPUs matches AMD’s, but the head-to-head scores show the two are only comparable in average benchmark score, not in actual performance distribution.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core rendering?

A: The Intel Core i3-13100F wins all multi-core Cinebench tests by about 14.9%, including R23 multi-core (12458 vs 10846) and PassMark multithread (14687 vs 12761, a 15.1% lead).

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, it wins three tests: PassMark data encryption (9564 vs 8496, an 11.2% lead), integer math (44665 vs 43038, a 3.6% lead), and random string sorting (17255 vs 16569, a 4% lead).

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gaps are in PassMark physics (1055 vs 552, a 91.1% Intel lead) and PassMark find prime numbers (61 vs 31, a 96.8% Intel lead).

Q: Which processor uses less power?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE has a 35 watt TDP, while the Intel Core i3-13100F has a 58 watt TDP, making AMD the more power-efficient option.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE includes Radeon Vega 6 integrated graphics, while the Intel Core i3-13100F has none, requiring a discrete GPU for display output.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i3-13100F does not list ECC support, though it does support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while AMD is limited to DDR4.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i3-13100F | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE |

|----------------|----------------------|-------------------------|

| Base Clock | 3.40 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.20 GHz |

| TDP | 58 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 3 |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 7 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 8 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 20 Lanes | Gen 3, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon Vega 6 |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 163 mm² | 180 mm² |

| Transistors | Not specified | 10,700 million |