AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE vs Intel Core 7 150U Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE and Intel Core 7 150U occupy the same performance tier, with average benchmark scores of 17,482 and 17,395 respectively. This places them within 0.5% of each other, and both sit at the 71st percentile of all CPUs. Despite the statistical tie in overall averages, the two processors achieve their scores through fundamentally different means, with the AMD chip winning 2 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks while the Intel chip wins 15. The data reveals a clear split: the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE dominates in sustained multi-threaded rendering, while the Core 7 150U leads in nearly every other measured workload.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE wins in two specific benchmarks that point toward long-duration, multi-core compute. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD chip scores 10,846 against the Intel chip's 8,883, a 22.1% advantage. This is the largest single margin of victory for either processor. The Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE also takes PassMark extended instructions, scoring 10,368 versus 8,748, an 18.5% edge. These results suggest the AMD processor sustains higher throughput when all cores are engaged over longer render or instruction-heavy workloads.

The Intel Core 7 150U wins the remaining 15 benchmarks, but the margins vary widely by workload type. The largest Intel victories come in physics and prime-number finding, where it scores 1,012 versus 552 (45.5% ahead) and 58 versus 31 (46.6% ahead) respectively. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Intel chip posts 1,505.5 against 1,093, a 27.4% advantage, and in R15 single-core it leads 254 to 154, a 39.4% gap. The Intel processor also wins all PassMark math, compression, encryption, sorting, and single-thread tests, with margins ranging from 3.6% in data compression to 29.9% in floating-point math.

The pattern is consistent: Intel wins in short-burst, single-thread, and mixed-workload scenarios, while AMD wins specifically in Cinebench R23 multi-core and extended instruction throughput. The Cinebench R20 multi-core result complicates the picture, as Intel leads there 5,248 to 4,555 (13.2% ahead), yet AMD reverses the result in R23. This suggests the AMD chip scales better with the longer R23 render workload, while Intel's advantage appears in the shorter R20 run.

The Verdict

For users running prolonged multi-core renders, specifically Cinebench R23 workloads, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE is the stronger choice. Its 22.1% lead in that test is substantial, and its 18.5% advantage in extended instructions shows similar sustained compute capability. The AMD chip also offers ECC memory support, which the Intel chip lacks, a relevant factor for data-integrity-focused builds.

For virtually every other scenario, the Intel Core 7 150U is the better pick. It leads in both single-core and multi-core Cinebench R15 and R20 tests, all PassMark workloads except extended instructions, and delivers a 46.6% advantage in prime-number finding and 45.5% in physics. The Intel chip's 10 cores and 12 threads versus AMD's 4 cores and 8 threads explain its dominance in most multi-threaded tests. Its single-thread score of 3,508 versus 3,089 (11.9% ahead) confirms a per-core performance advantage as well.

The overall average scores are nearly identical, so the decision hinges on workload type. Choose AMD for sustained multi-thread rendering and ECC support; choose Intel for general productivity, single-thread performance, and mixed workloads where it wins the majority of benchmarks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest Intel victory is in PassMark find prime numbers, where it scores 58 against AMD's 31, a 46.6% margin. This is followed closely by PassMark physics at 1,012 versus 552, a 45.5% lead. In Cinebench R15 single-core, Intel leads 254 to 154, a 39.4% advantage, and in R15 multi-core it leads 1,505.5 to 1,093, a 27.4% margin. The Intel chip also wins floating-point math 34,405 to 24,115 (29.9% ahead) and R23 single-core 1,875.5 to 1,531 (18.4% ahead).

The AMD wins are fewer but notable. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, AMD scores 10,846 versus 8,883, a 22.1% advantage. In PassMark extended instructions, AMD leads 10,368 to 8,748, an 18.5% margin. These two wins demonstrate the AMD chip's ability to maintain higher throughput in specific sustained workloads, even though it loses the shorter Cinebench R20 multi-core test by 13.2%.

Smaller Intel margins include data compression (158,622 vs. 152,885, 3.6% ahead), data encryption (10,025 vs. 9,564, 4.6% ahead), random string sorting (18,269 vs. 17,255, 5.6% ahead), and single-thread PassMark (3,508 vs. 3,089, 11.9% ahead). Integer math goes to Intel 51,057 to 44,665, a 12.5% margin, and multithread PassMark goes to Intel 14,700 to 12,761, a 13.2% margin.

The data shows a binary distribution: Intel wins most tests by margins between 3.6% and 46.6%, while AMD wins two tests by 18.5% and 22.1%. The Cinebench R20 to R23 multi-core reversal is the most instructive result, indicating that the AMD chip's advantage appears specifically in the longer R23 workload.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE has an average benchmark score of 17,482, while the Intel Core 7 150U scores 17,395. This gives AMD a 0.5% advantage relative to Intel, though both fall within the same performance tier.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 150U win in single-core performance?

A: Yes. Intel leads in Cinebench R15 single-core (254 vs. 154, 39.4% ahead), R20 single-core (740 vs. 643, 13.1% ahead), R23 single-core (1,875.5 vs. 1,531, 18.4% ahead), and PassMark single-thread (3,508 vs. 3,089, 11.9% ahead).

Q: Where does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE outperform the Intel chip?

A: AMD wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core with 10,846 versus 8,883, a 22.1% margin, and in PassMark extended instructions with 10,368 versus 8,748, an 18.5% margin. These are its only two benchmark wins.

Q: How do the core and thread counts differ between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE has 4 cores and 8 threads. Intel also has a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz compared to AMD's 4.20 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 150U does not. This is a distinguishing feature for AMD in reliability-focused applications.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core 7 150U has a TDP of 15 watts. The Intel chip is rated for significantly lower power consumption.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE uses the Zen 3 architecture on the Cezanne codename, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It contains 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The Intel Core 7 150U uses the Raptor Lake architecture on the Raptor Lake-U codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD chip has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel chip has 10 cores and 12 threads.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD chip has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB L3. The Intel chip has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. The larger L3 cache on Intel likely contributes to its advantage in many workloads.

The AMD processor supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, though its memory bandwidth is not specified. AMD offers ECC memory support, while Intel does not. For PCIe, AMD provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while Intel provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes.

The integrated graphics differ: AMD uses Radeon Vega 6, while Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. Both processors are currently active in production. The AMD chip has a locked multiplier, as does the Intel chip.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE | Intel Core 7 150U |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 10 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base clock | 3.60 GHz | 1.80 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.20 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Cezanne | Raptor Lake-U |

| Process node | 7 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 10,700 million | Not specified |

| Die size | 180 mm² | Not specified |

| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | Not specified |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon Vega 6 | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release date | 2024-09-04 | 2024-01-07 |

| Part number | 100-000001751 | SRMYP |

The Intel chip offers more cores, threads, cache, and a higher boost clock, while the AMD chip has a higher base clock and lower process node. The AMD chip's larger TDP of 35 watts versus 15 watts reflects its desktop orientation, while the Intel chip targets mobile platforms. AMD's ECC support and higher PCIe lane count are notable advantages, while Intel's Gen 4 PCIe provides newer protocol support.