AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE vs Intel Core 5 315 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark record shows a clear overall winner in raw performance, with the Intel Core 5 315 taking 15 of 17 head-to-head tests. The Cinebench suite is uniformly decisive: the Intel part leads by 16.4% in Cinebench R23 multi-core (12981 vs 10846) and by 16.4% in R23 single-core (1832 vs 1531). The same gap pattern repeats across R15 and R20, with the Intel processor ahead by 16.3% in R15 single-core (184 vs 154), 16.4% in R15 multi-core (1308 vs 1093), 16.4% in R20 single-core (769 vs 643), and 16.5% in R20 multi-core (5452 vs 4555). This consistent margin suggests the Intel chip's advantage scales evenly across both lightly and heavily threaded rendering workloads.

PassMark tests reveal a more nuanced distribution. The Intel Core 5 315 wins the single-thread test by 23.2% (4021 vs 3089), multithread by 16.4% (15272 vs 12761), floating point math by 43.2% (42441 vs 24115), physics by 52.5% (1163 vs 552), extended instructions by 21.1% (13143 vs 10368), data encryption by 14% (11119 vs 9564), prime number finding by 72.3% (112 vs 31), and random string sorting by a slim 1.7% (17551 vs 17255).

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE claims two victories, both in integer-oriented workloads. It beats the Intel part by 40.9% in integer math (44665 vs 31690) and by 4.6% in data compression (152885 vs 146143). These wins show the Zen 3 design retains a notable edge in specific arithmetic tasks, even as the Intel processor dominates most other PassMark sub-tests.

The overall benchmark averages confirm the Intel lead: the Core 5 315 posts an average benchmark score of 18188 versus 17482 for the AMD chip, a difference of roughly 4%. The Intel part sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD part sits at the 71st percentile. Despite the 15-to-2 win tally, the percentile gap remains small, indicating both processors occupy similar tiers in the broader CPU landscape.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE uses the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It packs 4 cores with 8 threads, using simultaneous multithreading to double its logical core count. The Intel Core 5 315, codenamed Wildcat Lake, uses a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry and offers 6 physical cores with 6 threads, meaning no hyper-threading on this part.

Cache configurations diverge sharply. The AMD chip allocates 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 8 MB L3 cache. The Intel chip uses 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2 total, and 6 MB of shared L3. The AMD processor's larger per-core L2 allocation benefits its integer math dominance, while the Intel part's smaller total cache still manages to lead in most throughput tests.

Memory support represents another major split. The AMD processor uses DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth and supports ECC. The Intel processor uses DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a single-channel configuration with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth and no ECC support. Despite the single-channel limitation, the Intel part's faster memory standard delivers higher theoretical bandwidth, which likely contributes to its Cinebench and physics test advantages.

PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD chip provides Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel chip provides Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics also differ, with AMD using Radeon Vega 6 and Intel using Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Intel part carries a TDP of 15 watts versus 35 watts for the AMD chip, and the Intel processor uses the BGA 1516 socket while the AMD chip uses Socket AM4.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 315 dominates in rendering, physics simulation, floating point math, encryption, prime number calculation, and overall single-threaded responsiveness. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12981 versus 10846 shows a 16.4% advantage that matters for video rendering, 3D scene compilation, and other heavily threaded creative workloads. The physics test result of 1163 versus 552 points to a 52.5% lead, suggesting the Intel chip handles game physics and simulation tasks with substantially more headroom. The extended instructions score of 13143 versus 10368 (21.1% ahead) indicates stronger SIMD and specialized instruction execution.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE wins in integer math and data compression. Its 40.9% lead in integer math (44665 vs 31690) suggests a clear advantage in database operations, code compilation, and other integer-heavy tasks. The data compression score of 152885 versus 146143 (4.6% ahead) points to solid performance in file archiving and storage-related workloads. These two wins show the AMD chip's Zen 3 architecture still excels where raw integer throughput matters most, even against a newer process node.

For general desktop responsiveness, the Intel part's 23.2% single-thread lead in PassMark (4021 vs 3089) translates to snappier application launches and more responsive everyday use. The AMD chip's multithreading capability (8 threads vs 6) does not overcome the Intel part's higher per-core performance in the overall benchmark averages.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE | Intel Core 5 315 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 6 |

| Base clock | 3.60 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.20 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Process node | 7 nm | 3 nm |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 192 KB total |

| L2 cache | 512 KB per core | 2.5 MB total |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR4 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 lanes | Gen 4, 6 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon Vega 6 | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release date | September 2024 | April 2026 |

| Part number | 100-000001751 | SAEFC |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $340 |

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core 5 315 leads in single-core tests across the board. It scores 184 in Cinebench R15 single-core versus 154 for the AMD chip, 769 in R20 versus 643, and 1832 in R23 versus 1531. The PassMark single-thread test shows 4021 versus 3089.

Q: Does the AMD processor have any benchmark wins?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE wins two head-to-head tests: PassMark integer math with 44665 versus 31690 (40.9% ahead) and PassMark data compression with 152885 versus 146143 (4.6% ahead).

Q: What is the TDP difference between these two processors?

A: The AMD chip has a TDP of 35 watts while the Intel chip has a TDP of 15 watts. The Intel part draws less power despite having more cores and a higher boost clock.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 5 315 does not.

Q: How do their overall benchmark averages compare?

A: The Intel Core 5 315 has an average benchmark score of 18188 compared to 17482 for the AMD chip. The Intel part sits at the 72nd percentile while the AMD part sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD processor supports DDR4 in dual-channel mode with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in single-channel mode with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

The Verdict

The data shows the Intel Core 5 315 as the stronger performer in nearly every measured category. Its 16.4% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 23.2% lead in PassMark single-thread make it the better choice for users who prioritize rendering speed, physics calculations, encryption throughput, floating point math, and general application responsiveness. The 3 nm process node, higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz, and faster DDR5 memory support all contribute to its consistent advantage across 15 benchmark tests.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE remains the better option for specific integer-heavy workloads. Its 40.9% lead in integer math and 4.6% lead in data compression show that Zen 3's architecture still holds an edge in those areas. The dual-channel memory support, ECC capability, and desktop socket AM4 platform make it a valid choice for ECC-reliant systems or integer-focused compute tasks.

The Intel chip's 15-watt TDP versus 35 watts for the AMD part, combined with its higher average benchmark score, indicates better performance-per-watt. The 6-core, 6-thread configuration of the Intel part outperforms the 4-core, 8-thread AMD chip in multithreaded tests despite having fewer threads, which points to the efficiency of the Wildcat Lake design. Users seeking maximum raw performance across the broadest range of workloads should select the Intel Core 5 315, while those with specific integer math or compression requirements may find the AMD processor's targeted strengths more suitable.