AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600G Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE are both AM4 desktop processors, but they target different corners of the market. The 4600G is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 2 part with a 65W TDP, while the 5355GE is a 4-core, 8-thread Zen 3 part with a 35W TDP. Benchmark data shows the 4600G wins 15 of 17 head-to-head comparisons, yet the 5355GE takes the single-thread PassMark crown and offers a newer architecture with ECC support. This analysis breaks down where each chip excels based solely on the provided benchmark and specification data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G has an average benchmark score of 17507, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE scores 17482. The 4600G leads by 0.1%.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 4600G scores 13593 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 25.3% higher than the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE’s score of 10846.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE wins?

A: Yes, the 5355GE wins PassMark single-thread and singlethread tests with a score of 3089, which is 14.1% higher than the 4600G’s score of 2653. These are the only two benchmark wins for the 5355GE out of 17 head-to-head tests.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Ryzen 5 4600G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Do these processors support ECC memory?

A: No for the 4600G, which has ECC memory support listed as false. Yes for the 5355GE, which has ECC memory support listed as true.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP and what does that imply for system design?

A: The Ryzen 5 4600G has a 65W TDP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE has a 35W TDP. The lower TDP of the 5355GE suggests it is designed for more power-efficient or compact systems.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different generations of AMD’s core designs. The Ryzen 5 4600G uses the Zen 2 architecture, specifically the Renoir codename, and belongs to the 4000 series. The Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE uses the Zen 3 architecture, with the Cezanne codename, and belongs to the 5000 series. Both are built on TSMC’s 7 nm process node, but the transistor counts differ: the 4600G has 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die, while the 5355GE has 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die.

Cache configurations are similar in structure but differ in L3 allocation. Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. The 4600G has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, while the 5355GE has 8 MB of L3 cache (listed without the "shared" qualifier). The 5355GE’s Zen 3 architecture typically delivers higher instructions per clock, which is reflected in its single-thread PassMark win.

A key feature difference is ECC memory support: the 5355GE supports ECC, the 4600G does not. Both use DDR4 memory with dual-channel support and identical 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth. PCIe support also differs, with the 4600G offering Gen 3 with 20 lanes (CPU only) versus the 5355GE’s Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ as well: the 4600G has Radeon Vega 7, while the 5355GE has Radeon Vega 6. The 4600G has an unlocked multiplier, while the 5355GE does not.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 4600G is the clear winner in multi-threaded workloads. Its 6-core/12-thread configuration gives it a substantial advantage in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests, all showing a 25.3% lead over the 5355GE. It also wins heavily in PassMark data compression (51.4% ahead), data encryption (41.9% ahead), and extended instructions (47.4% ahead). For users running rendering, video encoding, or database workloads, the 4600G is the stronger choice based on these figures.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE wins only in PassMark single-thread and singlethread tests, scoring 3089 versus 2653, a 14.1% advantage. This indicates better per-core performance from the newer Zen 3 architecture. However, this single-thread win does not translate to wins in Cinebench single-core tests, where the 4600G leads by 25.3% in R15 and R23 and 25.2% in R20. The 5355GE’s lower 35W TDP also makes it more suitable for low-power or passively cooled builds, though the data does not quantify cooling requirements.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several core specifications. The 4600G has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the 5355GE has 4 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks are 3.70 GHz for the 4600G and 3.60 GHz for the 5355GE, but both boost to 4.20 GHz. TDP is a major difference: 65W for the 4600G versus 35W for the 5355GE.

Architecture and codename differ: Zen 2 (Renoir) for the 4600G versus Zen 3 (Cezanne) for the 5355GE. The process node is the same (7 nm, TSMC), but transistor count and die size differ: 9,800 million transistors on 156 mm² for the 4600G, versus 10,700 million on 180 mm² for the 5355GE. L3 cache is 8 MB on both, but the 4600G lists it as "shared" while the 5355GE does not. ECC memory support is false for the 4600G and true for the 5355GE. PCIe lanes differ: 20 for the 4600G versus 16 for the 5355GE, both Gen 3. Integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 7 for the 4600G and Radeon Vega 6 for the 5355GE. The 4600G has an unlocked multiplier; the 5355GE is locked. Release dates are July 20, 2020 for the 4600G and September 4, 2024 for the 5355GE. The 4600G has a launch MSRP of $154; the 5355GE has no listed launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a dominant performance from the Ryzen 5 4600G across nearly every test. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the 4600G scores 1370 against the 5355GE’s 1093, a 25.3% difference. The same 25.3% margin appears in R15 single-core (193 vs 154), R20 multi-core (5709 vs 4555), R23 multi-core (13593 vs 10846), and R23 single-core (1919 vs 1531). R20 single-core shows a 25.2% lead (805 vs 643). These consistent margins suggest a fundamental throughput advantage for the 4600G.

PassMark tests reveal even larger gaps in specialized workloads. Data compression shows the 4600G at 231426 versus 152885, a 51.4% lead. Data encryption is 13572 vs 9564, a 41.9% gap. Extended instructions score 15280 vs 10368, a 47.4% difference. Random string sorting is 24246 vs 17255, a 40.5% lead. Floating point math favors the 4600G at 29947 vs 24115, a 24.2% margin. Integer math is closer at 50723 vs 44665, a 13.6% lead for the 4600G. Physics tests show 676 vs 552, a 22.5% gap. Multi-thread PassMark is 15992 vs 12761, a 25.3% difference. Even find prime numbers, the closest test, shows the 4600G ahead at 32 vs 31, a 3.2% margin.

The only reverse results come in PassMark single-threaded tests. The 5355GE scores 3089 versus the 4600G’s 2653, a 14.1% advantage. This is the sole area where the newer Zen 3 architecture outperforms the older Zen 2 design, appearing in both "single_thread" and "singlethread" tests with identical scores.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G for almost any compute-heavy task. It wins 15 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, with leads ranging from 3.2% in prime number finding to 51.4% in data compression. The 4600G’s 6-core/12-thread setup provides a 25.3% advantage across all Cinebench versions, making it the better choice for multi-threaded rendering, compilation, or any workload that scales with core count. Its higher 65W TDP is the trade-off for this performance.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE should be selected when single-thread performance and power efficiency are the priorities. Its 14.1% PassMark single-thread win demonstrates the Zen 3 core’s strength, though this does not translate to Cinebench single-core victories. The 35W TDP makes it suitable for compact or low-power systems, and ECC memory support is a critical feature for reliability-focused builds that the 4600G cannot offer. Its 4-core/8-thread count is adequate for lighter workloads, but the benchmark data shows it falls behind significantly in multi-threaded tasks.

For a builder who needs maximum throughput from an AM4 APU, the 4600G is the data-backed winner. For a builder prioritizing low power draw, ECC support, or the latest core architecture, the 5355GE has specific advantages. The overall average scores are nearly identical (17507 vs 17482), so the decision comes down to workload type rather than overall capability.