AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G vs Intel Core 5 223PTE Comparison

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G vs Intel Core 5 223PTE

The database contains a detailed record for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G, with eleven benchmark scores across a range of workloads, and a specification-only entry for the Intel Core 5 223PTE, which has no recorded benchmark results. This asymmetry shapes the analysis. The AMD part can be placed against its closest competitors using measured data, while the Intel part must be assessed primarily on its architectural and specification profile. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G posts an average benchmark score of 27,382, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs tested. Its nearest measured rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700H at 27,355 (0.1% slower), the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H at 27,507 (0.5% faster), the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 at 27,535 (0.6% faster), and the Intel Core i5-12600K at 27,578 (0.7% faster). The Intel Core 5 223PTE has an average score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking, indicating no benchmark data has been recorded, so direct numerical comparison between the two named processors is not possible from the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Given that the head-to-head benchmark array is empty and the Intel Core 5 223PTE has no recorded scores, a direct comparison of test results cannot be established. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G, however, provides a full set of measurements. Its highest single score appears in the passmark_data_compression test at 168,041, which is a dominant result relative to its other workload scores. The passmark_integer_math score reaches 45,910, while passmark_floating_point_math hits 25,245. The passmark_multithread test records 14,033, and single-thread performance is measured at 3,096 in both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread entries. Other scores include passmark_extended_instructions at 11,935, passmark_data_encryption at 10,288, passmark_random_string_sorting at 18,819, passmark_find_prime_numbers at 36, and passmark_physics at 701.

The Intel Core 5 223PTE, lacking any benchmark entries, cannot be compared on these tests. Its specification sheet does suggest capabilities that might translate to strong performance, but without measured data, any inference remains speculative. The AMD part's percentile ranking of 79 indicates it outperforms a substantial majority of all recorded CPUs, with its average score of 27,382 sitting within 1% of four distinct rival processors. The tight cluster of those rivals, from 27,355 to 27,578, shows that the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G operates in a highly competitive performance band. For the Intel Core 5 223PTE, the 50th percentile ranking, paired with a zero average score, likely reflects an absence of submissions rather than a literal performance level, since a processor with no data cannot be positioned meaningfully against the AMD part's measured results.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G have any benchmark advantage over the Intel Core 5 223PTE?

A: The database shows no head-to-head benchmark results and no recorded scores for the Intel Core 5 223PTE, so no quantitative advantage can be stated. The AMD part has eleven measured scores, with its average at 27,382.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How do their clock speeds differ?

A: The AMD part has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 223PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, and has a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Are there differences in the integrated graphics?

A: Yes. The AMD part uses Radeon Vega 6 graphics, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the Intel Core 5 223PTE?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 5 223PTE is $232. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design lineages. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G is built on the Zen 3 architecture, with the codename Cezanne, and belongs to the Ryzen 3 generation specifically listed as Zen 3 (Cezanne). It uses a 7 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, with a transistor count of 10,700 million and a die size of 180 mm². The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, belongs to the Core 5 generation, and is built on a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. No transistor count or die size is recorded for the Intel part.

Cache structures differ substantially. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core L2 and shared L3 on the Intel part could favor workloads that benefit from larger data residency, though this is not directly measurable from the database. The AMD part's smaller caches are paired with a lower core count, which may affect multithreaded scaling.

Memory architecture also diverges. The AMD part supports only DDR4 memory, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bandwidth figures reflect this: the AMD part records 51.2 GB/s, while the Intel part records 89.6 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD part uses Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Both support ECC memory, which is recorded as true for each. The sockets are incompatible: the AMD part uses AMD Socket AM4, and the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

The integrated graphics solutions are distinct. The AMD part carries Radeon Vega 6, while the Intel part carries UHD Graphics 770. Neither is benchmarked in the database, so relative graphics performance cannot be quantified. The production status for both is listed as Active, and both have locked multipliers, meaning they are not unlocked for overclocking.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications show clear differences across nearly every field. Core count: 4 on the AMD part versus 8 on the Intel part. Thread count: 8 versus 16. Base clock: 4.00 GHz on the AMD part versus 2.30 GHz on the Intel part. Boost clock: 4.20 GHz versus 5.40 GHz. TDP: 65 watts on the AMD part versus 45 watts on the Intel part. Socket: AMD Socket AM4 versus Intel Socket 1700. Process node: 7 nm versus 10 nm. Transistors: 10,700 million on the AMD part, with no figure recorded for the Intel part. Die size: 180 mm² on the AMD part, with no figure for the Intel part. L1 cache: 64 KB per core versus 80 KB per core. L2 cache: 512 KB per core versus 2 MB per core. L3 cache: 8 MB versus 24 MB shared. Memory support: DDR4 versus DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: 51.2 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. PCIe: Gen 3 with 16 lanes versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: Radeon Vega 6 versus UHD Graphics 770. Release date: September 4, 2024, for the AMD part versus March 8, 2026, for the Intel part. The AMD part has a part number of 100-000001749, while the Intel part has a part number of SA4QL. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $232, while the AMD part has none recorded. The AMD part has a series designation of 5000 series, while the Intel part has no series recorded.

The Verdict

The data presents an unusual situation. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G is fully characterized by eleven benchmark scores, an average score of 27,382, and a 79th percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.7% of its average score, include both Intel and AMD processors with higher core counts, such as the 8-core Intel Core i7-13700H and the 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 5800. This suggests the 4-core AMD part is competitive with larger processors in the average benchmark score, likely due to its high base clock and efficient Zen 3 architecture.

The Intel Core 5 223PTE, by contrast, has no benchmarks, no average score, and a 50th percentile ranking with zero data. Its specifications indicate a higher core count, a much higher boost clock, larger caches, and faster memory bandwidth, but none of these are validated by measured performance. The verdict from the database is that the AMD part is a proven performer with a clear performance profile, while the Intel part is an unproven entity whose capabilities are only theoretical.

For users relying on recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G is the only part with measurable results. Its 0.1% lead over the Intel Core i7-13700H and 0.7% deficit to the Intel Core i5-12600K place it in a specific performance tier. The Intel Core 5 223PTE cannot be ranked against the AMD part due to missing data, so any choice between the two must rest on specifications alone, with the Intel part offering more cores, a higher boost clock, and broader memory support, but with no confirmation of actual performance.

Where Each One Wins

From the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G wins in every benchmark category where scores exist, since the Intel Core 5 223PTE has none. The AMD part's strengths are visible in specific workloads. Its data compression score of 168,041 is exceptionally high relative to its other results, indicating strong performance in compression tasks. Its integer math score of 45,910 and floating point math score of 25,245 show solid arithmetic throughput. Single-thread performance at 3,096 is a notable figure, given that the part has a modest 4.20 GHz boost clock. The multithread score of 14,033, achieved with only 4 cores and 8 threads, suggests efficient scaling for its core count.

The Intel Core 5 223PTE, based solely on specifications, would likely win in scenarios that favor more cores, higher boost clocks, larger caches, and faster memory. Its 8 cores and 16 threads could benefit parallel workloads, while its 5.40 GHz boost clock might produce strong single-thread results, though no measurements confirm this. Its 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth could help data-intensive applications. Its Gen 5 PCIe interface offers higher bandwidth potential for expansion devices. However, the database does not support any claim of a benchmark victory for the Intel part.

The AMD part's wins are all in the measured domain. Its percentile ranking of 79 versus the Intel part's 50, even with the Intel part's zero data, reflects that the AMD part has demonstrated performance above a majority of tested CPUs. The Intel part's percentile of 50 appears to be a default placement rather than a measured result. The AMD part also wins on process node efficiency, with a smaller 7 nm node versus 10 nm, and on transistor density, with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The Intel part wins on raw specification counts: more cores, more threads, higher boost clock, larger caches, higher memory bandwidth, and broader memory support. For users who prioritize verified benchmark data, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G is the only choice with evidence. For users who prioritize maximum specification values, the Intel Core 5 223PTE offers a more expansive feature set, but its actual performance remains unrecorded in the database.