AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G vs Intel Core 5 223PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G

CORE STATE Cezanne
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4 Base / 4.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 223PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.9 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
168,041
346,623
passmark_data_encryption
10,288
18,448
passmark_extended_instructions
11,935
24,672
passmark_find_prime_numbers
36
159
passmark_floating_point_math
25,245
76,468
passmark_integer_math
45,910
99,819
passmark_multithread
14,033
31,124
passmark_physics
701
2,493
passmark_random_string_sorting
18,819
35,798
passmark_single_thread
3,096
4,219
passmark_singlethread
3,096
4,219
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,666
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
376
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
11,111
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,568
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
26,455
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,734

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G vs Intel Core 5 223PE

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G and the Intel Core 5 223PE occupy different tiers of the desktop processor market, but both are active production parts. The database records a decisive performance gap between them, with the Intel part winning all 11 shared benchmark comparisons. The Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G delivers a strong showing for a 4-core, 8-thread chip, while the Core 5 223PE, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, operates in a higher performance class entirely. The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 27,382, placing it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel part averages 40,585, sitting at the 87th percentile. That difference in average score, roughly 48% higher for the Intel chip, frames every head-to-head result below.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided result in the comparison is the PassMark find prime numbers test. The Intel Core 5 223PE scores 159, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G scores 36, a gap of 77.4%. This workload is highly sensitive to integer execution and cache bandwidth, areas where the Intel part’s larger core count and bigger L3 cache provide a substantial edge. The AMD chip still completes the task, but the recorded data shows it finishing far behind.

The floating point math test shows a similar pattern. Intel scores 76,468 against AMD’s 25,245, a difference of 67%. This workload scales with vector throughput and core count, and the Intel part’s 8 cores double the AMD part’s 4 cores. The physics test, another multi-threaded workload, sees Intel at 2,493 and AMD at 701, a 71.9% deficit for the Ryzen chip. These three results, prime numbers, floating point, and physics, are the largest percentage losses for the AMD processor.

The multi-threaded benchmark, which is the broadest measure of parallel performance, shows Intel at 31,124 and AMD at 14,033, a 54.9% gap. That result aligns with the core and thread count difference: Intel has twice the cores and twice the threads. The data compression test shows Intel at 346,623 against AMD’s 168,041, a 51.5% gap. Integer math, a fundamental measure of CPU throughput, has Intel at 99,819 and AMD at 45,910, a 54% gap. Extended instructions, which includes newer SIMD operations, shows Intel at 24,672 and AMD at 11,935, a 51.6% gap.

The narrowest loss for the AMD part comes in the single-threaded test. Intel scores 4,219, while AMD scores 3,096, a 26.6% gap. That is still a clear margin, but it is the closest the two processors come in any comparison. The random string sorting test shows Intel at 35,798 and AMD at 18,819, a 47.4% gap. Data encryption shows Intel at 18,448 and AMD at 10,288, a 44.2% gap. The Intel part wins every single recorded benchmark, with no wins recorded for the AMD processor.

The database also places each processor among its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G sits within 0.7% of the Intel Core i5-12600K, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, which means its average score is effectively in line with those mainstream desktop and mobile parts. The Intel Core 5 223PE sits within 0.3% of the Intel Core 7 253PE, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G, and the Intel Xeon 6357P, a much higher performance neighborhood.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G is built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 223PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. The AMD part integrates 10,700 million transistors on a die size of 180 mm², while the Intel part’s transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

Core counts differ sharply. The AMD part has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel part has 8 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds also favor Intel: the AMD base clock is 4.00 GHz with a boost of 4.20 GHz, while the Intel base clock is 2.90 GHz with a boost of 5.20 GHz. The Intel part reaches a much higher maximum frequency, even though its base clock is lower.

Cache configurations are distinct. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. That larger L3 pool, combined with twice the cores, explains much of the Intel part’s lead in memory-sensitive workloads like prime number finding and data compression.

Memory support also differs. The AMD part supports DDR4 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, but with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The higher bandwidth on the Intel side helps feed its 8 cores in memory-heavy tasks. Both parts support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part uses Radeon Vega 6, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. Both processors use different sockets: the AMD part fits AMD Socket AM4, and the Intel part fits Intel Socket 1700. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE has an average benchmark score of 40,585, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G has an average score of 27,382. The Intel part also sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the AMD part’s 79th percentile.

Q: How much faster is the Intel part in single-threaded workloads?

A: In the PassMark single-threaded test, the Intel Core 5 223PE scores 4,219, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G scores 3,096. That is a 26.6% advantage for Intel, the smallest gap between the two processors in any recorded benchmark.

Q: What explains the Intel part’s large lead in multi-threaded tests?

A: The Intel part has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD part has 4 cores and 8 threads. In the PassMark multi-threaded test, Intel scores 31,124 against AMD’s 14,033, a 54.9% gap. The core count difference directly doubles parallel throughput capability.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G supports DDR4 only, while the Intel Core 5 223PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, but the Intel part has a higher recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, compared to 51.2 GB/s for the AMD part.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G has 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part also has 2 MB of L2 cache per core, compared to 512 KB per core on the AMD part.

Q: Are there any benchmark categories where the AMD processor wins?

A: No. The database records 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors, and the Intel Core 5 223PE wins all 11. The AMD part’s closest result is the single-threaded test, where it trails by 26.6%.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in every major specification field. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G is a 4-core, 8-thread part from the 5000 series, while the Intel Core 5 223PE is an 8-core, 16-thread part. Base clock speeds are 4.00 GHz for AMD and 2.90 GHz for Intel, while boost clocks are 4.20 GHz for AMD and 5.20 GHz for Intel. Both have a TDP of 65 watts.

The sockets are different: AMD uses AMD Socket AM4, and Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The process nodes are 7 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel, with AMD using TSMC as the foundry and Intel using its own foundry. The AMD part has a recorded transistor count of 10,700 million and a die size of 180 mm², while the Intel part has no recorded transistor count or die size.

Cache sizes differ at every level. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Memory support is DDR4 for AMD and DDR4 plus DDR5 for Intel, with memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s for AMD and 89.6 GB/s for Intel. PCIe generation is Gen 3 for AMD and Gen 5 for Intel, both with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 6 for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel.

The release dates differ, with the AMD part released in September 2024 and the Intel part released in March 2026. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $232, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. The part numbers are 100-000001749 for AMD and SA4QF for Intel. The AMD part’s generation is listed as Ryzen 3 (Zen 3, Cezanne), while the Intel part’s generation is listed as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake).

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 223PE wins every measured benchmark category in the database. Its largest advantages come in multi-threaded and compute-heavy workloads: prime number finding, floating point math, and physics tests all show gaps of 67% or more in Intel’s favor. The Intel part also leads by over 50% in integer math, data compression, extended instructions, and the multi-threaded test. For workloads that use all available cores, such as rendering, simulation, or parallel data processing, the Intel part is the clear choice based on the recorded scores.

The Intel part also wins in memory-intensive scenarios. Its 24 MB of shared L3 cache, combined with 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, supports its strong performance in data compression and random string sorting. The higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz contributes to its single-threaded lead, though that lead is smaller at 26.6% than its multi-threaded margins.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G does not win any benchmark category, but its profile still fits certain use cases. Its 65 watt TDP matches the Intel part, but its smaller core count means it draws less performance per watt in parallel workloads. The AMD part uses the AM4 socket, which may be relevant for systems with existing AM4 motherboards. It also supports DDR4 memory only, which can simplify upgrades in DDR4-based systems. Its Radeon Vega 6 integrated graphics may be sufficient for basic display output, and its 7 nm process at TSMC indicates a more advanced manufacturing node.

For single-threaded responsiveness, the Intel part still leads, but the AMD part’s 4.20 GHz boost clock keeps it competitive enough to avoid the massive gaps seen in parallel tests. The AMD part’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5800, which places it in the mainstream desktop performance range. The Intel part’s nearest rivals, including the Intel Core 7 253PE and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G, place it in a higher performance tier.

The database shows no scenario where the AMD part outperforms the Intel part, but the choice between them depends on platform compatibility and workload requirements. Systems built around AM4 with DDR4 memory can use the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G without changing the platform, while the Intel part requires an LGA 1700 motherboard. For users prioritizing raw performance across all measured categories, the Intel Core 5 223PE is the stronger part, with its average score of 40,585 placing it well above the AMD part’s 27,382. The Intel part also reaches the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD part reaches the 79th percentile, confirming its higher standing in the overall performance distribution.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
3 PRO 5355G
5 223PE
Core Specs
Cores
4
8 +100.0%
Threads
8
16 +100.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
4
2.9 -27.5%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.2
5.2 +23.8%
Frequency (GHz)
4
2.9 -27.5%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.2
5.2 +23.8%
Multiplier
40
29 -27.5%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
65 0.0%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
219 W
PPT
88 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
—
Codename
Cezanne
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 3 (Zen 3 (Cezanne))
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
7 nm
10 nm
Transistors
10,700 million
—
Die Size
180 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM4
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 6
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$232
Part Number
100-000001749
SA4QF
Package
µOPGA-1331
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
View Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G Details View Core 5 223PE Details