AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G vs Intel Xeon E-2246G Comparison

The Verdict

The data presents a fascinating split. The Intel Xeon E-2246G and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G are essentially tied in Cinebench workloads, with the AMD chip taking razor-thin wins in R20 and R23, but the Intel part dominates Geekbench multicore by 11.4%. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G wins the single-core crown decisively, posting an 11% lead in Geekbench single-core, which points to its modern Zen 3 architecture.

For a builder prioritizing raw multi-threaded throughput in Geekbench-style workloads, the Xeon E-2246G is the pick. Its 6 cores and 12 threads give it a structural advantage that shows in that 5988 vs 5373 score. However, for anyone who values single-thread responsiveness, the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G is the clear winner, and it does so while consuming less power (65W TDP vs 80W TDP). The Ryzen is also an active product, while the Xeon is end-of-life. If you need a current platform with a path forward, the AMD part is the logical choice. If you are building on an existing Socket 1151 platform and need the extra cores, the Xeon remains a viable option.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design eras. The Intel Xeon E-2246G is built on Intel's 14 nm process using the Coffee Lake architecture, specifically the Coffee Lake-S WS variant. It is part of the Xeon E-2200 series, a lineup aimed at servers and workstations. The die size is 154 mm². In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G is a 7 nm part fabricated by TSMC, using the Zen 3 architecture under the Cezanne codename. It belongs to the Ryzen 5000 series and targets desktop systems. Its die is larger at 180 mm² and it packs 10,700 million transistors, a figure the Intel part does not have recorded.

The core counts differ significantly. The Xeon offers 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ryzen provides 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel chip has a higher boost clock at 4.80 GHz compared to the Ryzen's 4.20 GHz, but the Ryzen starts with a higher base clock at 4.00 GHz versus 3.60 GHz. Cache layouts also diverge. Both share 64 KB of L1 per core, but the Xeon has 256 KB of L2 per core, while the Ryzen doubles that to 512 KB per core. For L3, the Xeon provides 12 MB shared, while the Ryzen has 8 MB total.

Memory bandwidth favors the AMD part. Both support dual-channel DDR4 and both support ECC memory, but the Ryzen's recorded memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s, notably higher than the Xeon's 42.7 GB/s. Both use PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ: the Xeon uses HD Graphics P630, while the Ryzen uses Radeon Vega 6. The Xeon is an end-of-life product released in May 2019 with a launch MSRP of $311, while the Ryzen launched in May 2021 and remains active in production.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results are astonishingly close. In Cinebench R15 multicore, both CPUs score exactly 1181, a perfect tie. The same happens in R15 single-core, with both at 166. Moving to R20 multicore, the Ryzen edges ahead with 4924 against the Xeon's 4922, a negligible 0% delta. In R20 single-core, the Ryzen scores 695 versus 694, again a 0.1% difference. R23 multicore shows the Ryzen at 11724 and the Xeon at 11720, essentially identical. R23 single-core is 1655 for the Ryzen and 1654 for the Xeon. Across all six Cinebench tests, the margin is never more than 0.1%. This is a statistical dead heat in rendering workloads, despite the Xeon having two more cores and four more threads.

The Geekbench results break the tie dramatically. In Geekbench multicore, the Xeon scores 5988, which is 11.4% ahead of the Ryzen's 5373. This is the biggest win for either side. The extra cores clearly pay off in this benchmark. However, in Geekbench single-core, the Ryzen reverses the trend with a score of 1813 against the Xeon's 1613, an 11% advantage. The Zen 3 architecture's superior per-core performance is evident here. The overall benchmark score in the database reflects this split: the Xeon has an average benchmark score of 3492, while the Ryzen sits at 3441. The Xeon ranks in the 55th percentile of all CPUs, while the Ryzen ranks in the 54th percentile.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G is technically ahead, scoring 11724 in multicore versus 11720 for the Intel Xeon E-2246G, and 1655 in single-core versus 1654. These differences are effectively a tie, with deltas of 0% and 0.1% respectively.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon E-2246G have more cores than the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G?

A: Yes. The Xeon has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ryzen has 4 cores and 8 threads. This gives the Xeon a structural advantage in multi-threaded workloads like Geekbench multicore, where it leads by 11.4%.

Q: Which CPU offers better single-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G wins single-core tests. It scores 1813 in Geekbench single-core versus 1613 for the Xeon, an 11% lead. In Cinebench single-core tests, the Ryzen also edges ahead, though only by 1 point in R15 (166 vs 166), R20 (695 vs 694), and R23 (1655 vs 1654).

Q: Do both CPUs support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon E-2246G and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G support ECC memory. Both also use dual-channel DDR4, though the Ryzen has a higher memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s compared to the Xeon's 42.7 GB/s.

Q: Which processor is still in production?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G is an active product, while the Intel Xeon E-2246G is end-of-life. The Xeon was released in May 2019, and the Ryzen came later in May 2021.

Q: What is the TDP of each CPU?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2246G has a TDP of 80W, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G has a lower TDP of 65W, making the AMD part more power-efficient on paper.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon E-2246G wins in Geekbench multicore, and that is its primary battlefield. With a score of 5988, it beats the Ryzen by 11.4%, and this is the largest performance gap recorded in any test between the two. The Xeon also holds the higher boost clock at 4.80 GHz, which may help in bursty workloads despite the Ryzen's higher base clock. The Xeon's larger L3 cache of 12 MB shared could also benefit certain data-heavy tasks. Its market segment is listed as server and workstation, so it is positioned for professional environments where multi-threaded throughput matters. In the database, the Xeon's average benchmark score of 3492 places it slightly above the Ryzen's 3441, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-9900T and Xeon E5-1680 v4, all within a 0.2% delta.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G wins everywhere else. It takes single-core honors with an 11% lead in Geekbench single-core, scoring 1813 versus 1613. It also wins all six Cinebench tests, albeit by margins of 0% to 0.1%. The Ryzen's 7 nm process and Zen 3 architecture deliver superior per-core efficiency, which is why it wins single-threaded tests despite having a lower boost clock (4.20 GHz vs 4.80 GHz). It has a higher memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 42.7 GB/s), which could help in memory-sensitive applications. Its TDP of 65W is lower than the Xeon's 80W, making it a more attractive option for compact or power-conscious builds. The Ryzen's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i7-5960X and AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS, all within a 0.2% delta.

For gaming or everyday desktop responsiveness, the Ryzen's single-core advantage and active production status make it the sensible choice. For workstation-style workloads that scale with cores, particularly those that resemble Geekbench multicore, the Xeon's two extra cores and 11.4% lead give it a clear edge. The data does not show a universal winner, it shows a platform choice.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E-2246G | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G |

|---|---|---|

| Series | Xeon E-2200 series | 5000 series |

| Cores | 6 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.20 GHz |

| TDP | 80W | 65W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Coffee Lake | Zen 3 |

| Codename | Coffee Lake-S WS | Cezanne |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 10,700 million |

| Die Size | 154 mm² | 180 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 8 MB |

| Memory Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics P630 | Radeon Vega 6 |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Desktop |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2019-05-28 | 2021-05-31 |

| Launch MSRP | $311 | Not recorded |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | SRF7G | 100-000000256 |