AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U vs Intel Xeon E-2234 Comparison
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
Xeon E-2234
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U vs Intel Xeon E-2234
The Verdict
The benchmark data tells a surprisingly close story between these two four-core, eight-thread processors. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U wins all six head-to-head benchmark comparisons, but the margins are razor-thin—every multicore and single-core test shows a delta of just 0.2% or less. In practical terms, these CPUs are performance twins in CPU-bound workloads. The real differentiators lie elsewhere: the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U is a 15W mobile part with integrated Radeon Graphics 320SP, while the Xeon E-2234 is a 71W server/workstation chip with UHD Graphics P630 and ECC memory support. Choose the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U if you need a low-power mobile solution with modern 7nm efficiency. Choose the Xeon E-2234 if you require ECC memory, a server/workstation market segment, and the Intel Socket 1151 platform. The Xeon does carry a launch MSRP of $250, while the Ryzen has no listed launch MSRP. Both sit at the 48th percentile against all CPUs, reinforcing that neither is a performance outlier—they are mid-pack processors with nearly identical compute capabilities.
FAQ
Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U wins all three multi-core Cinebench tests, but by margins of only 0.2%. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD scores 8230 versus the Intel's 8210. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, it's 3456 versus 3448. In R15 multi-core, it's 829 versus 827.
Q: Is there any single-core performance difference?
A: The data shows essentially no difference. In Cinebench R15 single-core, both score exactly 116. In R20 single-core, the AMD scores 487 versus 486 for the Intel. In R23 single-core, the AMD scores 1161 versus 1159. The AMD wins all three, but the largest margin is 0.2%.
Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?
A: Only the Intel Xeon E-2234 supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U has ECC memory set to false in the specifications. This is a critical differentiator for workstation or server applications where data integrity matters.
Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U has an average benchmark score of 2413, while the Intel Xeon E-2234 averages 2374. The AMD sits 0.2% above the Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 in its nearest rivals list, while the Intel sits 0.4% above the Intel Xeon E-2226GE.
Q: What are the thermal design power differences?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U has a TDP of 15W, making it a low-power mobile processor. The Intel Xeon E-2234 has a TDP of 71W, more than four times higher, reflecting its server/workstation positioning.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Xeon E-2234 has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, significantly higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U's 3.70 GHz. Despite this clock advantage, the Intel does not win any benchmark comparisons in the data.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U is built on the Zen 2 architecture with the Renoir codename, fabricated on a 7nm process by TSMC. It packs 9,800 million transistors into a 156 mm² die. The Intel Xeon E-2234 uses the Coffee Lake architecture with the Coffee Lake-S WS codename, built on Intel's 14nm process with a 126 mm² die size and no listed transistor count. The manufacturing process difference is substantial—7nm versus 14nm—which explains how the AMD achieves similar performance at a fraction of the power draw. The AMD part features 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel also has 64 KB of L1 per core but only 256 KB of L2 per core. The Intel compensates with a larger shared L3 cache of 8 MB versus the AMD's 4 MB. Both support DDR4 memory and dual-channel memory buses, but the AMD has a significantly higher memory bandwidth at 68.3 GB/s versus the Intel's 42.7 GB/s. The AMD is a mobile segment part with AMD Socket FP6, while the Intel is a server/workstation part on Intel Socket 1151. The AMD features Radeon Graphics 320SP as integrated graphics, while the Intel uses UHD Graphics P630. Both have locked multipliers and PCIe Gen 3 support, though the Intel specifies 16 lanes (CPU only) while the AMD does not list lane counts.
Specification Differences
The core and thread counts are identical: both have 4 cores and 8 threads. The base clocks differ significantly, with the Intel at 3.60 GHz versus the AMD at 2.40 GHz. Boost clocks also favor the Intel at 4.80 GHz versus 3.70 GHz. The TDP is the biggest specification gap—the AMD draws only 15W compared to the Intel's 71W. The process node difference is 7nm (TSMC) versus 14nm (Intel). The AMD has more L2 cache per core (512 KB versus 256 KB), but the Intel has more L3 cache (8 MB versus 4 MB). Memory bandwidth favors the AMD at 68.3 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s. ECC memory support is exclusive to the Intel. The AMD uses AMD Socket FP6, while the Intel uses Intel Socket 1151. The AMD is from the 4000 series and Ryzen 3 generation, while the Intel is from the Xeon E-2200 series and Xeon E generation. The AMD was released on 2020-05-06, while the Intel was released on 2019-05-28. The AMD's production status is Active, while the Intel is End-of-life. The AMD's part number is 100-000000104, and the Intel's is SRFAX. The Intel has a launch MSRP of $250; the AMD has none listed.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U wins all six head-to-head comparisons, but the margins are almost imperceptible. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD scores 829 against the Intel's 827, a 0.2% delta. The R15 single-core test is a perfect tie at 116 points each, though the AMD is still credited with the win due to a 0% delta. Moving to Cinebench R20, the AMD takes multi-core at 3456 versus 3448 (0.2%) and single-core at 487 versus 486 (0.2%). In Cinebench R23, the AMD wins multi-core at 8230 versus 8210 and single-core at 1161 versus 1159, both again by 0.2%. The Geekbench results are only available for the AMD: 3840 multi-core and 1181 single-core, with no corresponding Intel scores in the data. The average benchmark score reinforces the parity—the AMD averages 2413, while the Intel averages 2374, a difference of about 1.6%. Both CPUs occupy the 48th percentile against all CPUs, meaning they outperform roughly half of all processors in the database. The AMD's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 (0.2% behind), Intel Core i7-9850HE (0.3% ahead), Intel Core i5-8500B (0.4% ahead), and AMD Ryzen 5 4680U (0.5% ahead). The Intel's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E-2226GE (0.4% behind), Intel Core i5-8600T (0.4% ahead), AMD Ryzen 5 2500X (0.6% behind), and Intel Core i5-9600 (0.8% behind).
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U wins every benchmark in the head-to-head data set, but the practical significance of these wins is minimal given the sub-1% margins. The AMD's real advantages are efficiency and platform features. Its 15W TDP makes it suitable for thin-and-light mobile devices, and its 7nm process with 9,800 million transistors demonstrates modern manufacturing sophistication. The AMD also has a substantial memory bandwidth advantage at 68.3 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s, which could benefit memory-intensive workloads even if CPU-bound tests show parity. The AMD's active production status means it remains available for new designs, while the Intel is end-of-life.
The Intel Xeon E-2234 wins on specifications that matter for specific use cases. Its ECC memory support is a hard requirement for many server and workstation environments where data corruption is unacceptable. The higher base and boost clocks (3.60 GHz and 4.80 GHz versus 2.40 GHz and 3.70 GHz) suggest better single-threaded responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks, even though the Cinebench single-core tests show no measurable advantage. The larger 8 MB L3 cache could benefit workloads with larger working sets. The Intel's server/workstation market segment and Intel Socket 1151 platform make it a drop-in replacement for existing Coffee Lake-S WS systems. The 71W TDP, while higher, is normal for desktop-class server parts and allows sustained operation without the thermal constraints of a 15W mobile chip. The Intel's launch MSRP of $250 provides a reference point for procurement, while the AMD has no listed MSRP. In summary, the AMD wins on efficiency, memory bandwidth, and active production status; the Intel wins on ECC support, clock speed, L3 cache size, and server platform compatibility.