AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U vs Intel Xeon E-2134 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2134 boosts to 4.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U reaches 3.70 GHz. The Intel part also starts with a higher base clock of 3.50 GHz versus 2.40 GHz for the AMD.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U scores 8230, which is 2.6% ahead of the Intel Xeon E-2134's 8018. This pattern repeats across all Cinebench versions, with the AMD part winning every head-to-head test.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U has a 15 W TDP, while the Intel Xeon E-2134 is rated at 71 W. This makes the AMD processor substantially more power-efficient on paper.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Xeon E-2134 supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U does not. This is a key differentiator for workstation reliability scenarios.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U averages 2413 across all recorded benchmarks, while the Intel Xeon E-2134 averages 2319. Both sit at the 48th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: What is the release timeline for these processors?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2134 launched on July 11, 2018, and is now marked as end-of-life. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U launched on May 6, 2020, and remains in active production.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U is built on TSMC's 7 nm process with a Zen 2 architecture under the Renoir codename. It packs 9,800 million transistors into a 156 mm² die. The Intel Xeon E-2134 uses Intel's 14 nm process with a Coffee Lake-S WS design, measuring 126 mm² with no transistor count recorded in the database.

Both chips feature 4 cores and 8 threads, but their cache hierarchies differ. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part matches the L1 allocation at 64 KB per core but halves L2 to 256 KB per core, while doubling L3 to 8 MB shared.

Memory support shows both using dual-channel DDR4, but the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U claims 68.3 GB/s of bandwidth versus 42.7 GB/s for the Intel Xeon E-2134. ECC memory is supported only on the Intel side, which aligns with its server/workstation market segment. The AMD part targets mobile devices, while the Intel part is aimed at servers and workstations.

Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD chip includes Radeon Graphics with 320 SP, while the Intel part carries UHD Graphics P630. Both use PCIe Gen 3, though the Intel Xeon E-2134 specifies 16 lanes for the CPU only. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP6, while the Intel part uses Socket 1151. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head data shows a clean sweep for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U across all six benchmark comparisons. The margins are consistent, hovering around 2.5% to 2.6% in every test.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD part scores 829 versus 808 for the Intel Xeon E-2134, a 2.6% advantage. The single-core R15 result shows 116 against 114, a 1.8% edge. Moving to Cinebench R20, the AMD chip leads with 3456 over 3367 in multi-core (2.6%) and 487 over 475 in single-core (2.5%).

Cinebench R23 confirms the same pattern: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U posts 8230 versus 8018 in multi-core, and 1161 versus 1132 in single-core, both at 2.6% deltas. The AMD processor also has Geekbench scores of 3840 multi-core and 1181 single-core, though no comparable Geekbench numbers were recorded for the Intel part.

The win count stands at 6 for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U and 0 for the Intel Xeon E-2134. While the margins are modest, they are uniform across every workload, suggesting a consistent architectural advantage rather than a test-specific anomaly. The Intel part's higher clock speeds do not translate into benchmark victories, as the AMD chip's efficiency appears to compensate effectively.

The Verdict

The data points to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U as the stronger performer in every recorded benchmark, with margins of roughly 2.5% across the board. Its lower TDP of 15 W versus 71 W makes it the clear choice for power-constrained environments, particularly mobile deployments. The Intel Xeon E-2134 counters with ECC memory support and a larger 8 MB L3 cache, which may matter for specific workstation reliability requirements.

For users prioritizing raw benchmark results, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U wins every head-to-head comparison. For users requiring ECC memory and a server-oriented feature set, the Intel Xeon E-2134 remains the only option between these two, despite its lower scores and higher power draw. The Intel part's end-of-life status also factors into long-term availability considerations, while the AMD chip remains active in production.

The percentile rankings are identical (48th for both), but the average benchmark score favors the AMD part at 2413 versus 2319. The nearest rival data reinforces this gap: the AMD chip sits within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, while the Intel part is within 0.5% of the Intel Core i7-8809G, placing them in slightly different performance tiers.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U | Intel Xeon E-2134 |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 2.40 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.70 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 71 W |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 156 mm² | 126 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | 42.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 320SP | UHD Graphics P630 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP6 | Intel Socket 1151 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | May 6, 2020 | July 11, 2018 |

The Intel Xeon E-2134 has a launch MSRP of $256. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U wins decisively in every measured benchmark category. Its Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 scores, both single-core and multi-core, all exceed the Intel Xeon E-2134's results. The Geekbench data further strengthens the AMD case, with scores of 3840 multi-core and 1181 single-core recorded, though no Geekbench numbers exist for the Intel part to compare directly.

The AMD processor also wins on power efficiency. Its 15 W TDP is a fraction of the Intel part's 71 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light mobile systems where thermal and battery constraints dominate. The 68.3 GB/s memory bandwidth versus 42.7 GB/s gives the AMD chip a theoretical advantage in memory-intensive workloads, even though the Intel part's 8 MB L3 cache could help with frequently accessed data.

The Intel Xeon E-2134 wins on clock speed, with a 4.50 GHz boost and 3.50 GHz base, both substantially higher than the AMD's 3.70 GHz and 2.40 GHz. It also supports ECC memory, a critical feature for error-sensitive server and workstation tasks. The larger 8 MB L3 cache and server-oriented market segment position it for traditional workstation roles where ECC and platform maturity matter more than raw benchmark margins.

In practical terms, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U is the pick for mobile users and anyone prioritizing the lowest power draw with slightly better performance. The Intel Xeon E-2134 is the pick for workstation deployments that require ECC memory and can tolerate higher power consumption, accepting the small performance deficit in exchange for those enterprise features. The Intel part's end-of-life status may also push buyers toward the AMD chip for new designs, as the AMD processor remains active and production-ready.