AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE vs Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 Comparison

The Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE are two processors from different eras and market segments, yet benchmark data places them remarkably close in overall performance. The Xeon, a 2015 server/workstation chip with 10 cores and 20 threads, and the Ryzen, a 2020 desktop APU with 4 cores and 8 threads, show an average benchmark score difference of less than 1%. The Xeon edges out a win in every Cinebench test, but the Ryzen counters with a higher clock speed, a more modern architecture, and an integrated GPU, making this a nuanced comparison.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Xeon offers 2.5 times the core count and thread count of the Ryzen.

Q: How does the single-core performance compare?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 wins all single-core Cinebench tests. Its lead is consistent at approximately 3.8% in R15, R20, and R23 single-core benchmarks, with scores of 137 vs 132, 571 vs 550, and 1361 vs 1311, respectively.

Q: What are the key architectural differences?

A: The Xeon is built on Intel's 22 nm Haswell-EP process, while the Ryzen uses TSMC's 7 nm Zen 2 (Renoir) process. The Ryzen also features a Radeon Vega 6 integrated GPU, which the Xeon lacks, and supports dual-channel memory compared to the Xeon's quad-channel memory.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both processors support ECC memory. The Xeon supports DDR4 with a quad-channel memory bus, and the Ryzen also supports DDR4 but with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE has a higher boost clock of 4.00 GHz, compared to the Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3's boost clock of 3.20 GHz. The Ryzen also has a higher base clock of 3.50 GHz versus 2.60 GHz.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 has an average benchmark score of 2789, and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE has an average benchmark score of 2767. This places the Xeon just 0.8% ahead on average.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is substantial. The Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 is based on the Haswell-EP architecture, fabricated on a 22 nm process by Intel. It contains 2,600 million transistors on a 356 mm² die. In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE uses the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Renoir, built on a 7 nm process by TSMC. This newer node packs 9,800 million transistors into a smaller 156 mm² die, highlighting the significant manufacturing advancements between 2015 and 2020.

Cache configurations also differ notably. The Xeon provides 64 KB of L1 cache and 256 KB of L2 cache per core, with a large 25 MB shared L3 cache. The Ryzen also has 64 KB of L1 per core, but doubles the L2 to 512 KB per core, while its L3 is much smaller at 4 MB shared. The Ryzen's higher per-core L2 cache may help with certain workloads, but the Xeon's massive L3 cache is a significant advantage for multi-threaded data sharing.

Memory architecture is another key differentiator. The Xeon supports quad-channel DDR4 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s, while the Ryzen uses dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Both support ECC memory, but the Xeon's wider memory bus favors memory-intensive server tasks. The Xeon also provides more PCIe connectivity with 40 lanes (Gen 3) versus the Ryzen's 16 lanes (Gen 3).

The most visible feature difference is the integrated graphics. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE includes a Radeon Vega 6 GPU, making it a complete APU solution, while the Xeon E5-4627 v3 has no integrated graphics and requires a discrete GPU. The Xeon is an end-of-life server product, while the Ryzen remains active in the desktop market.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

In all six Cinebench comparisons, the Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 emerges as the winner, but the margins are consistently narrow. The largest delta is 3.8%, seen across multiple tests. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Xeon scores 971 against the Ryzen's 936, a 3.7% lead. The R15 single-core test shows a similar gap, with the Xeon at 137 and the Ryzen at 132 (3.8% difference).

The pattern holds in newer benchmark versions. In Cinebench R20, the Xeon scores 4049 in multicore versus 3900 for the Ryzen (3.8% ahead), and 571 versus 550 in single-core (3.8% ahead). The Cinebench R23 results follow the same trend: the Xeon achieves 9642 in multicore and 1361 in single-core, while the Ryzen manages 9287 and 1311, respectively, both showing a 3.8% delta.

These results are interesting given the core disparity. The Xeon's 10 cores and 20 threads provide a theoretical advantage, but the Ryzen's higher clock speeds (3.50 GHz base and 4.00 GHz boost versus 2.60 GHz and 3.20 GHz for the Xeon) and newer architecture close the gap. The Ryzen's 4 cores and 8 threads compete effectively, but not enough to overcome the Xeon's raw core count in these multi-threaded tests. In single-core, the Ryzen's superior clock speed still yields a slight loss, suggesting the Xeon's Haswell architecture has competitive per-core efficiency.

The Ryzen also has a Geekbench result, scoring 4587 in multicore and 1436 in single-core, but no direct Xeon comparison is available for that test. The data shows a consistent, though small, performance advantage for the Xeon across all Cinebench versions.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear, if narrow, victory for the Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 in pure CPU benchmark performance. It wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests with a consistent 3.7-3.8% margin. For users prioritizing raw multi-threaded and single-threaded compute in applications similar to Cinebench, the Xeon is the stronger choice based on this data.

However, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE offers distinct advantages that make it suitable for different scenarios. Its integrated Radeon Vega 6 GPU eliminates the need for a separate graphics card, a critical factor for compact or budget-conscious systems. Its 35 W TDP is dramatically lower than the Xeon's 135 W, indicating superior energy efficiency for the performance delivered. The Ryzen's active production status and newer architecture also suggest longer-term availability and platform relevance.

The verdict depends on the user's priorities. If the workload is compute-heavy and a discrete GPU is already present, the Xeon's modest performance lead and server-grade features (quad-channel memory, 40 PCIe lanes) are compelling. If the goal is a low-power, all-in-one desktop solution with integrated graphics, the Ryzen is the logical pick, despite trailing in Cinebench scores. The data does not support a universal winner; it supports a use-case-specific choice.

Specification Differences

The following table highlights only the fields where the two processors differ:

| Specification | Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE |

|----------------|-----------------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 4 |

| Threads | 20 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.60 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.20 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| TDP | 135 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Haswell | Zen 2 |

| Codename | Haswell-EP | Renoir |

| Process Node | 22 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | 2,600 million | 9,800 million |

| Die Size | 356 mm² | 156 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 25 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| PCIe Lanes | 40 (Gen 3) | 16 (Gen 3) |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon Vega 6 |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Desktop |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2015-05-31 | 2020-07-20 |

| Launch MSRP | $2225 | Not listed |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 wins in every Cinebench benchmark category, establishing its superiority in both multi-core and single-core CPU workloads. Its 3.7-3.8% lead across R15, R20, and R23 indicates a consistent performance edge that scales with the benchmark version. This makes it the better option for users running CPU-intensive applications such as video rendering, 3D modeling, or scientific simulations that are heavily reliant on processing power. The Xeon's quad-channel memory and 40 PCIe lanes also make it a stronger foundation for workstation builds with high-bandwidth storage or multiple GPUs. Its 25 MB L3 cache is a significant asset for workloads with large, repeated data sets.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE, while losing all CPU benchmarks, wins decisively in system-level efficiency and integration. Its 35 W TDP is a fraction of the Xeon's 135 W, making it ideal for small-form-factor or passively cooled systems where heat and power are constraints. The integrated Radeon Vega 6 GPU provides a complete graphics solution, enabling a fully functional desktop without a discrete GPU. This is a clear advantage for office productivity, media consumption, or light graphical tasks. The Ryzen's higher clock speeds (3.50 GHz base, 4.00 GHz boost) may also provide snappier response in latency-sensitive, lightly-threaded applications, even if Cinebench single-core shows a slight loss. Its active production status ensures ongoing availability and driver support, which is a practical advantage over the Xeon's end-of-life status. For a low-power, all-in-one desktop, the Ryzen is the clear winner based on the data.