AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE vs Intel Core i3-8100T Comparison
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
Core i3-8100T
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE vs Intel Core i3-8100T
The Intel Core i3-8100T and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE are both 35W desktop processors with four cores and four threads. The recorded data shows a clear pattern: the AMD part wins every shared Cinebench test, while the Intel part posts a higher average benchmark score. This analysis breaks down the numbers, specifications, and architecture to determine which processor is the better fit for different workloads.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher base clock?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE has a base clock of 3.20 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-8100T runs at 3.10 GHz.
Q: Does either processor support a boost clock?
A: Only the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE has a boost clock, reaching 3.60 GHz. The Intel Core i3-8100T has no boost clock listed.
Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?
A: The Intel Core i3-8100T has 6 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE has 4 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: Which processor offers higher memory bandwidth?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE has a memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, compared to 38.4 GB/s for the Intel Core i3-8100T.
Q: Which processor is still in production?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE is listed as Active, while the Intel Core i3-8100T is End-of-life.
Q: Which processor scores higher in Cinebench R23 single-core?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE scores 713, while the Intel Core i3-8100T scores 630.
The Verdict
Based on the head-to-head data, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE is the stronger performer in every Cinebench test recorded. It leads by roughly 11.6% across both multi-core and single-core tests. The Intel Core i3-8100T does have a higher average benchmark score (1500 vs 1461), but that figure includes Geekbench results that are not available for the AMD part. For users who rely on Cinebench workloads, the AMD is the clear choice. The Intel part, however, has a launch MSRP of $117, which is the only pricing information in the database. Both processors share the same 35W TDP and four-core, four-thread configuration, so the decision comes down to performance and platform features.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database includes six Cinebench tests that both processors have taken. In every one, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE wins. The margins are consistent, ranging from 11.3% to 11.7%.
- Cinebench R15 multi-core: Intel scores 450, AMD scores 509. AMD wins by 11.6%.
- Cinebench R15 single-core: Intel scores 63, AMD scores 71. AMD wins by 11.3%.
- Cinebench R20 multi-core: Intel scores 1876, AMD scores 2121. AMD wins by 11.6%.
- Cinebench R20 single-core: Intel scores 264, AMD scores 299. AMD wins by 11.7%.
- Cinebench R23 multi-core: Intel scores 4467, AMD scores 5052. AMD wins by 11.6%.
- Cinebench R23 single-core: Intel scores 630, AMD scores 713. AMD wins by 11.6%.
The delta percentages are negative for the Intel part, indicating the amount by which it trails the AMD. The consistency of the margin across all tests suggests a fundamental performance advantage for the AMD architecture in these workloads.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Intel part has a base clock of 3.10 GHz and no boost clock, while the AMD part has a base of 3.20 GHz and a boost of 3.60 GHz. The Intel uses Socket 1151, the AMD uses AM4. The Intel is based on Coffee Lake, the AMD on Zen (Raven Ridge). The Intel is built on a 14nm process by Intel, the AMD on 14nm by GlobalFoundries. The AMD has 4,950 million transistors and a die size of 210 mm², while the Intel has no transistor count listed and a die size of 126 mm². Cache sizes differ: Intel has 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3; AMD has 96 KB L1, 512 KB L2, and 4 MB L3. Memory bandwidth is higher on AMD at 46.9 GB/s vs 38.4 GB/s. PCIe lanes: Intel has 16 lanes, AMD has 8. Integrated graphics: Intel UHD Graphics 630, AMD Radeon Vega 8. Production status: Intel end-of-life, AMD active. Release dates: Intel April 2018, AMD May 2018. Intel has a launch MSRP of $117, AMD has none listed. Both support DDR4, dual-channel, ECC, and have locked multipliers.
Architecture Differences
The architectural differences go beyond the spec sheet. Intel's Coffee Lake uses a 14nm process from Intel, while AMD's Raven Ridge uses 14nm from GlobalFoundries. The AMD chip integrates a Radeon Vega 8 GPU, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 630. The cache hierarchy is different: AMD has larger L1 and L2 per core but a smaller shared L3. AMD also has a higher memory bandwidth, which can benefit memory-intensive tasks. The AMD part has a boost clock, allowing it to reach 3.60 GHz under load, while the Intel part is fixed at 3.10 GHz. The transistor count and die size are also different, with AMD having a much larger die (210 mm² vs 126 mm²) and a transistor count of 4,950 million, while Intel does not list a transistor count. These differences contribute to the performance gap seen in the benchmarks.
Where Each One Wins
In the recorded head-to-head benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE wins all six Cinebench tests. This makes it the better choice for rendering, 3D modeling, and other workloads that rely on Cinebench scores. The Intel Core i3-8100T, however, has a higher average benchmark score (1500 vs 1461) when all its recorded scores are considered, including Geekbench results that are not available for the AMD. For users who prioritize the Geekbench metric, the Intel part may appear stronger, but the lack of a comparable AMD Geekbench score makes this a one-sided comparison. In terms of platform features, the Intel offers more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8), which could be beneficial for expansion cards. The AMD offers higher memory bandwidth and a larger L1/L2 cache. The Intel part is end-of-life, while the AMD is still active. Ultimately, the data shows that the AMD wins every shared benchmark, so for those specific workloads, it is the superior processor.