AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 are both 4-core processors, but they target completely different segments of the market. The Ryzen is a modern, power-efficient desktop part with integrated graphics, while the Xeon is an older, high-power server/workstation chip with a much larger platform footprint. The benchmark data shows a surprisingly consistent, though narrow, advantage for the AMD processor across every Cinebench test.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data is unambiguous regarding the winner of every single benchmark comparison. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G takes the win in all six head-to-head tests, though the margins are consistently slim. It is not a blowout; rather, it is a pattern of small but steady victories for the AMD part.

In the Cinebench R15 multicore test, the Ryzen scores 571, edging out the Xeon’s 568. That is a 0.5% delta. The single-core test in R15 shows a slightly larger gap, with the AMD scoring 80 against the Intel’s 79, a 1.3% advantage. This trend continues in the newer Cinebench R20 benchmark. The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G posts a multicore score of 2382, which is 0.6% ahead of the Xeon’s 2367. In the R20 single-core test, the AMD part scores 336 versus 333 for the Intel, a 0.9% lead.

The most recent Cinebench R23 results mirror the earlier tests. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G achieves a multicore score of 5672, beating the Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3’s 5637 by 0.6%. The single-core score of 800 for the AMD is also 0.6% higher than the Xeon’s 795. Across all tests, the AMD wins by a margin that never exceeds 1.3%, but it does win everywhere.

Looking at the broader average benchmark score, the AMD maintains its lead. The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has an average score of 1640, placing it in the 40th percentile of all CPUs. The Xeon E5-2623 v3 has an average score of 1630, which puts it in the 39th percentile. This places the AMD part directly between the Intel Core i7-8560U and the AMD Opteron 6380 in its nearest rivals list, while the Xeon sits between the Intel Core i7-8560U and the Intel Pentium Gold G7400T.

Architecture Differences

These two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is based on the Zen architecture, codenamed Raven Ridge, and is manufactured on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. This is a modern, monolithic design that integrates the Radeon Vega 8 graphics directly onto the die. The chip is relatively small at 210 mm² and contains 4,950 million transistors.

In contrast, the Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 is based on the much older Haswell architecture, specifically Haswell-EP. It is built on Intel’s 22 nm process. This is a larger die at 356 mm², but it contains significantly fewer transistors at 2,600 million. The Xeon lacks any integrated graphics, a distinction that is crucial for system builders. The AMD part is a 2018 release, while the Xeon dates back to 2014 and is now listed as end-of-life.

The cache configurations are also quite different. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a larger L1 cache at 96 KB per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, but its L3 cache is a smaller 4 MB shared pool. The Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 has a smaller L1 cache at 64 KB per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, but it compensates with a much larger 10 MB shared L3 cache. This larger L3 cache on the Xeon is typical for server parts, designed to hold more working data for multi-threaded workloads.

Memory support is another major divergence. Both support DDR4, but the AMD runs it in a dual-channel configuration with a peak bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s. The Intel Xeon supports quad-channel memory, giving it a higher theoretical bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. Both support ECC memory, which is a key feature for the server market. The platform connectivity differs as well. The AMD part provides PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes from the CPU, while the Xeon offers PCIe Gen 3 with a much more expansive 40 lanes, reflecting its intended role in a workstation or server motherboard.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G wins every single-core benchmark. It scores 80, 336, and 800 in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 respectively, against the Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3’s scores of 79, 333, and 795.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon have any multi-core advantage due to its 8 threads?

A: No. Despite having 8 threads to the AMD’s 4, the Xeon loses in every multicore test. The AMD scores 571, 2382, and 5672 in R15, R20, and R23, while the Xeon trails with 568, 2367, and 5637.

Q: Can I use the Intel Xeon in a standard desktop motherboard?

A: The data indicates the Xeon uses the Intel Socket 2011-3, which is a high-end desktop and server platform. It also requires a discrete graphics card, as it has no integrated graphics. The AMD part uses the more common AMD Socket AM4.

Q: Which processor has better memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 has a higher theoretical memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s due to its quad-channel memory bus. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a dual-channel bus with 46.9 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are both processors still in production?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is listed as "Active" in production status, while the Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 is listed as "End-of-life".

Q: Which CPU has a higher base clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a base clock of 3.50 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Xeon’s base clock of 3.00 GHz. The AMD also has a higher boost clock at 3.70 GHz versus 3.50 GHz for the Intel.

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents a clear picture: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is the faster processor in every Cinebench test, regardless of core count or single-threaded performance. It is not a large victory, with deltas ranging from 0.5% to 1.3%, but it is a consistent one. The Xeon’s 8 threads do not save it from losing the multicore tests, and its lower clock speeds likely explain its single-core deficit. The AMD part is also on a modern platform, is currently in production, and consumes significantly less power at a 35 W TDP versus the Xeon’s 105 W TDP.

However, the Xeon is not without its merits. The data shows it offers a substantially larger L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB) and significantly higher memory bandwidth (59.7 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s) thanks to its quad-channel memory controller. It also provides 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes compared to the AMD’s 8, making it a more capable platform for connecting multiple expansion cards, storage controllers, or high-end GPUs. The Xeon also supports ECC memory, as does the AMD, but its server-oriented platform is its primary strength.

For a general-purpose desktop build, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is the better choice based on raw performance and efficiency. For a system that requires massive memory bandwidth, extensive PCIe expansion, or a large shared cache, the Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 has the platform features to justify its existence, despite being slower in the tested benchmarks. The launch MSRP of the Xeon was $444, but that value is historical data, not a current price.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in almost every major specification category.

• Cores: Both have 4 cores, but the Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 has 8 threads while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has 4 threads.
• Clock Speeds: The AMD has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 3.70 GHz. The Intel has a base of 3.00 GHz and a boost of 3.50 GHz.
• Process Node: The AMD is built on a 14 nm process, while the Intel uses a 22 nm process.
• Die Size: The Intel Xeon has a larger die at 356 mm², compared to the AMD’s 210 mm².
• Transistors: The AMD chip contains 4,950 million transistors, while the Intel has 2,600 million.
• Cache: The AMD has 96 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 4 MB of shared L3. The Intel has 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core, with 10 MB of shared L3.
• Memory: The AMD is dual-channel with 46.9 GB/s bandwidth; the Intel is quad-channel with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.
• PCIe: The AMD provides Gen 3, 8 Lanes (CPU only); the Intel provides Gen 3, 40 Lanes (CPU only).
• Integrated Graphics: The AMD includes Radeon Vega 8; the Intel has none.
• Socket: The AMD uses AMD Socket AM4; the Intel uses Intel Socket 2011-3.
• TDP: The AMD is rated at 35 W; the Intel is rated at 105 W.
• Production Status: The AMD is Active; the Intel is End-of-life.
• Release Date: The AMD was released on 2018-05-09; the Intel was released on 2014-09-07.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G wins in every benchmark category that measures computational speed. It is the faster part for single-threaded tasks, as shown by its higher scores in all Cinebench single-core tests. It also wins in multi-threaded tasks, despite having half the thread count of the Intel competitor. Furthermore, it is the only one of the two with integrated graphics, enabling a build without a discrete GPU. Its lower TDP of 35 W also makes it far easier to cool and more appropriate for compact or power-efficient systems.

The Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 wins in the platform features that matter for server and workstation environments. Its quad-channel memory bus provides higher bandwidth, which can be beneficial for memory-intensive workloads that the Cinebench tests do not measure. Its 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes allow for a much higher degree of expansion, supporting multiple high-speed devices. The larger 10 MB L3 cache may also provide a benefit in certain database or caching workloads. It is the better choice for a system that needs maximum I/O capability and memory throughput, even if its raw CPU performance is slightly lower.