CPU Comparison
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Xeon E-2124
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Intel Xeon E-2124
# FAQ
Q: How do the two CPUs compare in overall benchmark average?
A: The Intel Xeon E-2124 has an average benchmark score of 1658, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G scores 1640. The Xeon leads by 18 points, which is roughly 1.1%, a narrow margin that places both chips at the same 40th percentile among all CPUs.
Q: Which processor wins in single-core performance?
A: The Intel Xeon E-2124 wins every single-core test. In Cinebench R15, it scores 81 versus 80 for the AMD (1.3% lead); in R20, 339 versus 336 (0.9% lead); and in R23, 809 versus 800 (1.1% lead). The margin is consistent but small.
Q: Are there any multi-core workloads where the AMD pulls ahead?
A: No. The head-to-head data shows the Xeon E-2124 winning all six benchmarks, including all three multi-core tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Xeon scores 577 versus 571 (1.1% lead); in R20, 2408 versus 2382 (1.1%); and in R23, 5734 versus 5672 (1.1%).
Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?
A: The Intel Xeon E-2124 has a TDP of 71 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a TDP of 35 watts. The AMD chip consumes less than half the thermal envelope of the Intel, which is a substantial difference for system cooling and power delivery design.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes. Both the Intel Xeon E-2124 and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G support ECC memory, making either suitable for workstation or entry-server environments where data integrity is a priority.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Xeon E-2124 boosts up to 4.30 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G boosts to 3.70 GHz. The Xeon also has a lower base clock at 3.30 GHz versus 3.50 GHz for the AMD, meaning the Intel relies more heavily on boost behavior.
---
The Verdict
The data paints a clear picture: the Intel Xeon E-2124 is the outright performance winner in every benchmark recorded. Across all six Cinebench tests, R15, R20, and R23, each in single-core and multi-core, the Xeon takes the lead, with margins ranging from 0.9% to 1.3%. The average benchmark score confirms this: 1658 for the Xeon versus 1640 for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G.
However, the verdict is not simply "pick the faster chip." The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G offers a 35-watt TDP versus the Intel's 71 watts, which is a decisive factor for compact builds, silent systems, or environments with tight thermal budgets. The AMD also brings Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics, whereas the Intel has UHD Graphics P630, a difference that matters for systems without a discrete GPU.
Who should pick the Intel Xeon E-2124? Anyone prioritizing maximum compute throughput per core, particularly in single-threaded workloads where the Xeon's 4.30 GHz boost clock and 1.3% R15 single-core advantage translate into measurable gains. The Xeon's 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes (CPU only) also double the AMD's 8 lanes, which benefits multi-GPU or NVMe-heavy configurations.
Who should choose the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G? Builders focused on power efficiency, since the 35-watt TDP enables passive or low-noise cooling solutions. The AMD also has a larger die (210 mm² versus 126 mm²) and more transistors (4,950 million versus unspecified for Intel), which hints at a richer integrated feature set. For a desktop system where the GPU is integrated and power draw matters more than a 1% benchmark delta, the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is the rational pick.
---
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The head-to-head results are remarkably consistent: the Intel Xeon E-2124 wins all six tests, but never by a commanding margin. The largest delta is in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the Xeon scores 81 against 80 for the AMD, a 1.3% lead. The smallest margin is also in single-core, with R20 showing 339 versus 336, a 0.9% difference.
Multi-core results are uniformly 1.1% in favor of the Xeon across all three Cinebench versions. In R15, the Xeon posts 577 versus 571; in R20, 2408 versus 2382; and in R23, 5734 versus 5672. The consistency of this 1.1% delta across different generations of the Cinebench test suggests a stable architectural advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.
Single-core performance shows slightly more variation. R15 gives the Xeon a 1.3% edge, R23 shows 1.1%, and R20 drops to 0.9%. This pattern implies the Intel's higher boost clock (4.30 GHz versus 3.70 GHz) provides a benefit that is partially offset by the AMD's higher base clock (3.50 GHz versus 3.30 GHz) in certain test conditions.
The average benchmark scores tell a similar story. The Xeon's 1658 average places it 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-4770HQ (1660) and 0.4% ahead of the Core i5-7600T (1664), wait, the data shows the i5-7600T at 1664, which is 0.4% above the Xeon. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G's 1640 average sits 0.2% above the AMD Opteron 6380 (1643), actually, the Opteron scores 1643, which is 0.2% above the Ryzen. The nearest rival to the Ryzen is the Intel Core i7-8560U at 1631, which the Ryzen leads by 0.5%.
---
Specification Differences
The two processors differ on several key specifications. The Intel Xeon E-2124 has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G runs at 3.50 GHz base and 3.70 GHz boost. This gives the Intel a 0.60 GHz boost advantage but a 0.20 GHz base clock deficit.
TDP is a major differentiator: Intel lists 71 watts, AMD lists 35 watts. This is a 2x difference in thermal design power, which has profound implications for cooling requirements and system power budgets.
Sockets differ entirely. The Intel uses Socket 1151, while the AMD uses Socket AM4. This means motherboard compatibility is mutually exclusive, no single platform can host both.
PCIe lane allocation also differs: the Intel provides 16 Gen 3 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD provides 8 Gen 3 lanes. For expansion-heavy workloads, the Intel's double lane count is a significant specification advantage.
Memory bandwidth shows a modest difference: the AMD lists 46.9 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s for the Intel, a 4.2 GB/s advantage for the AMD. Both support DDR4 dual-channel memory and ECC.
Integrated graphics differ: Intel includes UHD Graphics P630, while AMD includes Radeon Vega 8. The AMD's die size is 210 mm² versus 126 mm² for Intel, and AMD lists 4,950 million transistors, while Intel does not disclose a transistor count in the data.
---
Architecture Differences
The architectural divide is fundamental. The Intel Xeon E-2124 is built on Coffee Lake architecture (codename Coffee Lake-S WS) from the Xeon E-2100 series, fabricated on Intel's 14 nm process. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G uses the Zen architecture (codename Raven Ridge) from the 2000 series, also on 14 nm but from GlobalFoundries.
Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The Intel has 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core, with 8 MB shared L3. The AMD has 96 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, with only 4 MB shared L3. The AMD offers more per-core cache but half the shared L3, which affects how multi-core workloads access shared data.
The Intel's die size is 126 mm², while the AMD's is 210 mm², a 67% larger die for the AMD. The AMD also discloses 4,950 million transistors, a figure Intel does not provide in the data.
Market positioning diverges: the Intel is marked as Server/Workstation and is end-of-life, while the AMD is marked as Desktop and is still Active. The Intel's product generation is "Xeon E (Coffee Lake)", while the AMD's is "Ryzen 3 (Zen (Raven Ridge))".
The integrated graphics also reflect different design philosophies. Intel pairs its Xeon with UHD Graphics P630, while AMD integrates Radeon Vega 8. Given the AMD's larger die and higher transistor count, the Vega 8 likely occupies a significant portion of that silicon, a trade-off versus the Intel's smaller, more compute-focused die.
---
Where Each One Wins
Intel Xeon E-2124 wins on raw compute performance. All six benchmark tests favor the Xeon, with multi-core deltas locked at 1.1% and single-core deltas between 0.9% and 1.3%. For workloads where every percentage point matters, rendering, simulation, or heavy single-threaded applications, the Xeon's consistent edge is the deciding factor. The 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes also make it the choice for systems with multiple expansion cards.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G wins on power efficiency. The 35-watt TDP versus 71 watts is a decisive advantage that no benchmark score can offset. In compact cases, fanless builds, or always-on workstations, the AMD's lower thermal output enables quieter operation and lower electricity draw. The higher memory bandwidth (46.9 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s) provides a small but measurable benefit for memory-bound tasks.
The integrated graphics comparison favors AMD on paper. Radeon Vega 8 is a more substantial integrated GPU than Intel's UHD Graphics P630, though the data does not include graphics benchmarks. For a system without a discrete GPU, the AMD likely offers better display and light media capabilities.
The Intel wins for server/workstation duty. Its Xeon branding, ECC support, and 16 PCIe lanes align with server-class workloads. The fact that it is end-of-life may be a concern for long-term deployments, but its performance edge remains valid.
The AMD wins for active desktop use. Being an active production part with a 35-watt TDP, the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is easier to source and integrate into new desktop builds. The larger die and transistor count suggest a more feature-rich chip, even if the compute benchmarks show a slight deficit.