AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Intel Xeon D-1537 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clean sweep for the Intel Xeon D-1537 across every Cinebench test in the head-to-head comparison. The Xeon D-1537 wins all six benchmarks, with the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 trailing by margins that are consistent but narrow. The largest single-core advantage for Intel is 3.4% in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the Xeon scores 90 against the Ryzen's 87. In multi-core R15, the Xeon posts 637 versus 619, a 2.9% lead. The pattern repeats in Cinebench R20: Intel takes multi-core 2657 to 2582 and single-core 375 to 364, with deltas of 2.9% and 3.0% respectively. In the most recent Cinebench R23 generation, the Xeon D-1537 scores 6327 in multi-core and 893 in single-core, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 records 6148 and 868, again a 2.9% gap on both counts.

These margins are small in absolute terms. A 2.9% to 3.4% difference means the two chips are close enough that the winner could vary with cooling or silicon lottery, but the recorded data is unambiguous: the Xeon D-1537 leads in every run. The average benchmark score reinforces this, with the Intel at 1830 and AMD at 1778, a 2.9% overall gap that matches the individual deltas. The percentile ranking also favors Intel, sitting at 42 versus AMD's 41. For users who need the best possible Cinebench numbers, the Intel part is the pick, yet the AMD chip is never far behind.

Architecture Differences

The two processors take fundamentally different design routes, which explains their divergent strengths. The Intel Xeon D-1537 is built on Broadwell architecture, a 14 nm process node fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 246 mm² and 3,200 million transistors. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 2.30 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses the Zen architecture (Summit Ridge), also on a 14 nm node but made by GlobalFoundries, with a smaller die of 213 mm² and a higher transistor count of 4,800 million. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, base clock of 3.50 GHz, and boost of 3.70 GHz.

The core count difference is stark: 8 vs 4 cores and 16 vs 4 threads. The Ryzen compensates with much higher clocks, 3.50 GHz base versus 1.70 GHz, and 3.70 GHz boost versus 2.30 GHz. Yet the benchmark results show the Intel's thread advantage outweighs the AMD's clock speed in multi-core workloads, while the AMD's higher clocks are nullified by the Intel's superior single-thread performance per clock, which is an architecture trait of Broadwell over Zen at this time.

Cache layouts also diverge. The Intel has 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 1.5 MB L3 per core, which totals 12 MB of L3 across 8 cores. The AMD has 96 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The AMD's larger per-core L1 and L2 can help with latency-sensitive tasks, but the Intel's distributed L3 may serve its thread schedule better. The AMD has a higher transistor count (4,800 million versus 3,200 million), but the Intel has a larger die, suggesting a denser but more efficient layout.

Memory support: the Intel supports both DDR3 and DDR4, while the AMD is DDR4-only. Both use dual-channel buses. The AMD has a specified memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, while the Intel does not have a recorded bandwidth figure in the database. Both support ECC memory, which is notable for reliability. The Intel uses an Intel BGA 1667 socket, a soldered server/embedded package, while the AMD uses the widely used AM4 socket with an unlocked multiplier. The Intel's PCIe is Gen 3 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD has no PCIe information in the database. The Intel is a server/workstation part; the AMD is a desktop part.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon D-1537 wins every benchmark in the head-to-head list, so in pure throughput it is the stronger processor. Its winning margins are all between 2.9% and 3.4%, which indicate a uniform advantage across both single-core and multi-core workloads. This means the Xeon is better for any task that runs Cinebench, which includes 3D rendering, video encoding, and other multithreaded productivity workloads. Its 8 cores and 16 threads are the obvious reason for the multi-core wins, but the single-core advantage is more about architecture efficiency than thread count, since both chips use similar process nodes.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300, despite losing all six head-to-head tests, still has a real role. Its higher base clock (3.5 GHz vs 1.70 GHz) does not translate into a single-core win in the recorded data, but the architecture is designed for desktop responsiveness. The AMD has a faster boost clock (3.70 GHz vs 2.30 GHz) and a higher memory bandwidth (42.7 GB/s vs no recorded figure for Intel). For users who only run single-threaded applications, the Ryzen's clock advantage would suggest better performance, but the Cinebench numbers show otherwise. The AMD also has an unlocked multiplier, which allows overclocking, a feature the Intel lacks. For users who plan to overclock, the Ryzen can potentially close or reverse the gap, but that is speculation beyond the data.

The Intel part is a strong server/embedded processor, with a 35 W TDP and ECC support, making it suited for rack-mounted servers or network appliances where power is a constraint. The AMD has a 65 W TDP, a desktop part with ECC support too, making it a choice for entry-level workstations or office desktops. The data shows the Intel wins all high-thread workloads, but the AMD is a viable option for single-thread if 2.9% to 3.4% is not critical.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon D-1537 | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 4 |

| Base clock | 1.70 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 2.30 GHz | 3.70 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1667 | AMD AM4 |

| Architecture | Broadwell | Zen (Summit Ridge) |

| Process node | 14 nm (Intel) | 14 nm (GlobalFoundries) |

| Transistors | 3,200 million | 4,800 million |

| Die size | 246 mm² | 213 mm² |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 96 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 256 KB per core | 512 KB per core |

| L3 cache | 1.5 MB per core | 8 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4 only |

| Memory bandwidth | Not recorded | 42.7 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 24 lanes (CPU only) | Not recorded |

| Integrated graphics | None | None |

| Market segment | Server/Workstation | Desktop |

| Multiplier | Locked | Unlocked |

| Release date | 2015-10-31 | 2017-06-28 |

| Launch MSRP | $470 | Not recorded |

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core rendering?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1537 wins all multi-core Cinebench tests. In R23 multi-core, it scores 6327 versus the AMD's 6148, a 2.9% lead. The Intel's 8 cores and 16 threads outpace the AMD's 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 have any advantage in single-core performance?

A: No. The Intel wins single-core Cinebench R23 with 893 versus 868, a 2.9% gap. In R20 single-core, Intel scores 375 versus 364, and in R15 single-core, Intel scores 90 versus 87. The AMD's higher clock (3.70 GHz boost) does not overcome the Intel's lower clock (2.30 GHz) on these tests.

Q: Can I use ECC memory with both processors?

A: Yes. Both the Intel Xeon D-1537 and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 support ECC memory. The Intel supports DDR3 and DDR4, while the AMD only supports DDR4. The AMD has a recorded memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, while the Intel does not have a recorded figure.

Q: Which processor is more suitable for a low-power server?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1537 has a 35 W TDP, a server/embedded socket (BGA 1667), and is a Server/Workstation segment part. The AMD has a 65 W TDP and a desktop AM4 socket. The Intel's lower power consumption and server DNA make it the data-backed choice, though the AMD also supports ECC.

Q: Are there any benchmark where the AMD wins?

A: No. The head-to-head data shows the Intel Xeon D-1537 wins all six Cinebench tests, with no wins for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300. The AMD's closest margin is 2.9% in Cinebench R15 multi-core (637 vs 619).

Q: Which processor has the higher overall benchmark score?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1537 has an average benchmark score of 1830, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has 1778, a 2.9% difference. The Intel also ranks in the 42nd percentile of all CPUs, versus 41st for the AMD.

The Verdict

The Intel Xeon D-1537 is the clear benchmark winner, taking all six head-to-head tests with margins between 2.9% and 3.4%. If Cinebench scores are the primary decision factor, the Intel is the only choice. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration and lower TDP (35 W) make it a compelling for server and workstation roles, especially in low-power embedded systems. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300, despite its higher clock speeds (3.5 GHz base, 3.7 GHz boost) and a more modern release date (2017 vs 2015), cannot catch up in the recorded data. Its average score is 1830 versus 1778, and its percentile rank (41st) is below the Intel's (42nd).

For a user building a desktop, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 still has merit due to its AM4 socket, unlocked multiplier, and lower price (no launch MSRP is recorded, but the Intel has a $470 launch MSRP). However, the benchmark data does not show any performance advantage for the AMD. The Intel's lead is consistent, but small, so the AMD may be acceptable if the user prefers a desktop platform, wants to overclock, or needs the AMD's higher memory bandwidth (42.7 GB/s). Otherwise, the Intel Xeon D-1537 should be the default pick for maximum Cinebench performance. The verdict is data-driven: the Intel wins on every recorded benchmark, but the AMD is a viable alternative for those who prioritize an unlocked desktop processor.