AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Intel Core i3-1315UE Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark data presents an unusual picture: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 wins every single head-to-head comparison, across all Cinebench versions and both multi-core and single-core workloads. The Intel Core i3-1315UE does not claim a single victory in the six recorded tests. This is a clean sweep, but the margins are remarkably narrow.

In multi-core workloads, the AMD part leads by 2.1% in Cinebench R15, 2.3% in R20, and 2.2% in R23. The absolute scores tell the story: 619 versus 606 in R15, 2582 versus 2525 in R20, and 6148 versus 6013 in R23. The AMD processor consistently holds a slim but repeatable advantage across all three generations of the Cinebench renderer.

Single-core performance follows the same pattern. The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 posts 87 points in R15 single-core versus 85 for the Intel chip, a 2.4% margin. In R20, the scores are 364 versus 356 (2.2% lead), and in R23, 868 versus 849 (2.2% lead). The consistency of these deltas, all hovering between 2.1% and 2.4%, suggests a stable architectural advantage rather than workload-specific noise.

The average benchmark score reinforces this narrative. The AMD processor averages 1778 points, while the Intel chip averages 1739, a gap of roughly 2.2%. Both processors sit at the 41st percentile among all CPUs in the database, meaning they occupy the same tier of overall performance despite their architectural differences.

What is striking is that the Intel Core i3-1315UE has more cores (6 versus 4) and more threads (8 versus 4), yet it still trails in multi-core tests. This is a meaningful finding: thread count alone does not dictate render performance in these workloads. The AMD chip's higher base clock (3.50 GHz versus 1200.00 MHz for Intel) may partially explain this, though the Intel part boosts to 4.50 GHz versus 3.70 GHz for AMD.

The data suggests that for Cinebench-style rendering, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is the safer choice, but the margins are so thin that real-world differences would be barely perceptible. The Intel chip's advantages lie elsewhere, primarily in its mobile pedigree and integrated graphics, not in raw Cinebench scores.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies and market segments. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses the Zen architecture, specifically the Summit Ridge variant, built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It is a desktop part with a 65 watt TDP, designed for AMD Socket AM4. The Intel Core i3-1315UE uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-U, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. It is a mobile part with a 15 watt TDP, designed for Intel BGA 1744.

The core configurations diverge sharply. The AMD chip has 4 cores and 4 threads, a classic 4C/4T layout. The Intel chip has 6 cores and 8 threads, indicating a hybrid arrangement likely using performance and efficiency cores, though the database does not specify the exact split. This gives Intel a 50% advantage in core count and a 100% advantage in thread count, yet the benchmark results show AMD winning.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The AMD processor has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 10 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel's larger L3 (10 MB versus 8 MB) and much larger per-core L2 (1.25 MB versus 512 KB) do not translate into Cinebench victories in the recorded data.

Memory support shows another split. The AMD part supports DDR4 only, with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth rating of 42.7 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, while the Intel chip does not. For workstation or server-adjacent use, ECC support could be a deciding factor.

Integrated graphics is a major differentiator. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has no integrated graphics, meaning a discrete GPU is mandatory. The Intel Core i3-1315UE includes UHD Graphics 64EU, allowing for a complete system without a separate graphics card. This is a meaningful advantage for the mobile segment where the Intel chip operates.

PCIe support also differs. The Intel chip lists PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD chip's PCIe information is not recorded in the database. The Intel part also has a much higher boost clock at 4.50 GHz versus 3.70 GHz for AMD, though the AMD base clock of 3.50 GHz far exceeds Intel's 1200.00 MHz base.

The multiplier is unlocked on the AMD part, while it is locked on the Intel chip. This means the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 can be overclocked, provided the motherboard and cooling allow it. The Intel part cannot be overclocked through the multiplier.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear but nuanced conclusion. If the workload is Cinebench-style rendering, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 wins every recorded test, with margins ranging from 2.1% to 2.4%. The consistency of these margins across six tests makes the result reliable within the scope of the database.

However, the context matters enormously. The AMD chip is a desktop processor with a 65 watt TDP, no integrated graphics, and a 2017 release date. The Intel chip is a mobile processor with a 15 watt TDP, integrated UHD Graphics 64EU, and a 2023 release date. These are not direct competitors in the traditional sense; they serve different platforms and use cases.

For a desktop build where a discrete GPU is already planned, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 offers slightly better Cinebench performance and ECC memory support, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The 65 watt TDP is manageable with a capable air cooler, though the database does not specify cooler requirements.

For a mobile or compact system where integrated graphics are essential, the Intel Core i3-1315UE is the only viable choice between the two, since the AMD part has no iGPU. The Intel chip's 15 watt TDP also makes it far more suitable for battery-powered or thermally constrained devices.

The percentile data shows both processors at the 41st percentile among all CPUs, meaning they are statistically equivalent in overall standing. The average benchmark scores (1778 versus 1739) confirm this near-parity. The choice should be driven by platform requirements, not raw performance, since the performance gap is minimal.

Users prioritizing ECC memory, overclocking, or desktop expandability should choose the AMD part. Users needing integrated graphics, low power consumption, or a modern mobile platform should choose the Intel part. Neither choice is wrong based on the recorded data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 averages 1778 points, while the Intel Core i3-1315UE averages 1739 points, a difference of roughly 2.2%.

Q: Does the Intel Core i3-1315UE win any head-to-head benchmark?

A: No. The recorded data shows the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 winning all six head-to-head tests, including Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multi-core modes.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i3-1315UE does not support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i3-1315UE includes UHD Graphics 64EU. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the thread count difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i3-1315UE has 6 cores and 8 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has 4 cores and 4 threads. Intel has more threads, yet still loses all multi-core benchmarks.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i3-1315UE boosts to 4.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 boosts to 3.70 GHz.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The six recorded head-to-head comparisons all favor the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300, with remarkably consistent margins. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD part scores 619 versus 606 for Intel, a 2.1% lead. The single-core R15 test shows 87 versus 85, a 2.4% lead.

Cinebench R20 follows the same pattern. Multi-core results show 2582 for AMD versus 2525 for Intel, a 2.3% lead. Single-core results show 364 versus 356, a 2.2% lead. The R23 tests complete the sweep: multi-core 6148 versus 6013 (2.2% lead) and single-core 868 versus 849 (2.2% lead).

The largest margin is in Cinebench R15 single-core at 2.4%, while the smallest is in R15 multi-core at 2.1%. All other tests land at 2.2% or 2.3%. This consistency suggests the AMD architecture has a small but genuine performance advantage in these workloads, independent of the Cinebench version or core count.

Notably, the Intel chip's 6 cores and 8 threads do not help it in multi-core tests. The AMD chip's 4 cores and 4 threads outperform it by roughly 2% across all multi-core tests. This indicates that the AMD Zen cores are more efficient per thread in Cinebench rendering, despite the Intel chip's higher boost clock and larger cache.

The average benchmark scores reinforce the head-to-head results. AMD's 1778 average is 39 points higher than Intel's 1739, which is approximately a 2.2% gap. Both processors sit at the 41st percentile, but the AMD part sits slightly higher within that percentile band.

For users comparing these two, the benchmark data provides a simple answer: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is faster in every recorded Cinebench test. The margins are small, but they are uniform and reproducible across six independent measurements.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification category. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the Intel Core i3-1315UE has 6 cores and 8 threads. The AMD base clock is 3.50 GHz, while the Intel base clock is 1200.00 MHz. The AMD boost clock is 3.70 GHz, while the Intel boost clock is 4.50 GHz.

Thermal design power differs substantially: the AMD part is rated at 65 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 15 watts. The AMD socket is AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel socket is Intel BGA 1744. The AMD architecture is Zen (Summit Ridge), while the Intel architecture is Raptor Lake (Raptor Lake-U).

Process node and foundry also differ: AMD uses 14 nm at GlobalFoundries, while Intel uses 10 nm at Intel. The AMD die size is 213 mm² with 4,800 million transistors, while Intel's die size and transistor count are not recorded in the database.

Cache configurations differ in all three levels. AMD has 96 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 10 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR4 only, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory, but AMD's bandwidth is recorded at 42.7 GB/s while Intel's is not recorded.

ECC memory support is present on AMD but absent on Intel. PCIe support is recorded for Intel (Gen 4, 8 lanes) but not for AMD. Integrated graphics are present on Intel (UHD Graphics 64EU) but absent on AMD. The market segment differs: AMD is Desktop, Intel is Mobile. Release dates differ: AMD launched on 2017-06-28, Intel on 2023-01-03.

The multiplier is unlocked on AMD but locked on Intel. The AMD part number is YD130BBBM4KAE, while Intel's part number is not recorded. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP. Both processors have active production status and both sit at the 41st percentile among all CPUs.