AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE vs Intel Core i3-13100F Comparison

The Intel Core i3-13100F and AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE are both 4-core, 8-thread desktop processors, but they target distinctly different use cases. The Intel part, built on Raptor Lake, is a high-power desktop chip with a 58 W TDP and no integrated graphics, while the AMD part, built on Zen 4, is a 35 W efficiency-focused chip with Radeon 740M graphics. Benchmark data shows the Intel chip wins 12 of 17 head-to-head tests, but the AMD chip counters with wins in several single-threaded and specialized workloads, making the choice dependent on whether raw compute or power efficiency and platform features matter more.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-13100F is the clear winner in rendering and compute-heavy multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 12458 against the Ryzen 3 8300GE’s 11705, a 6.4% advantage. That pattern repeats across all Cinebench versions: R15 multi-core (1255 vs 1179, +6.4%), R20 multi-core (5232 vs 4916, +6.4%), and R23 single-core (1758 vs 1652, +6.4%). The Intel chip also dominates in PassMark’s physics simulation, scoring 1055 versus 750, a massive 40.7% lead, and in prime number finding (61 vs 44, +38.6%). Floating-point math is another Intel stronghold, with a 35.8% lead (33510 vs 24681). Data compression also favors Intel, at 168043 versus 155164, an 8.3% margin.

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE wins where its architecture’s efficiency and specific instruction handling shine. It takes PassMark single-thread with a score of 3644 versus 3609, a 1% edge, and repeats that in the duplicated singlethread test. Random string sorting goes to AMD by 8% (18010 vs 16569). Data encryption is a narrow AMD win (8603 vs 8496, +1.2%), and extended instructions favor AMD by 4.3% (11923 vs 11407). These are not large margins, but they show the Zen 4 core’s strength in latency-sensitive and cryptographic workloads. For users prioritizing raw multi-threaded throughput, the Intel part wins; for those who need low power draw and integrated graphics, the AMD part is the logical pick.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different platforms. The Intel Core i3-13100F uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process, with a die size of 163 mm². It has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE uses Zen 4 architecture on TSMC’s 4 nm process, packing 20,900 million transistors into a 137 mm² die. Its cache layout is smaller: 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. The Intel chip has a higher base clock at 3.40 GHz and a boost of 4.50 GHz, while the AMD chip boosts higher at 4.90 GHz but starts lower at 3.50 GHz.

Memory support diverges sharply. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, while the AMD chip is DDR5-only, also dual-channel, with a rated memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported on the AMD part but not on the Intel part. PCIe connectivity differs as well: Intel offers Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The most visible difference is integrated graphics: the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE includes Radeon 740M graphics, while the Intel Core i3-13100F has no integrated GPU at all, requiring a discrete graphics card. Sockets are incompatible: Intel uses Socket 1700, AMD uses AM5. The Intel chip has a 58 W TDP; the AMD chip is rated at just 35 W.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows a consistent Intel advantage across both multi-core and single-core tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, Intel scores 1255 versus 1179, a 6.4% win. The single-core test is even closer but still Intel: 177 versus 166, a 6.6% edge. Cinebench R20 multi-core repeats the 6.4% margin (5232 vs 4916), and R20 single-core shows 738 versus 693, a 6.5% lead. Cinebench R23 multi-core gives Intel 12458 against 11705, again 6.4%, and R23 single-core is 1758 versus 1652, also 6.4%. This uniformity across rendering workloads suggests the Intel core’s higher sustained clocks and larger L3 cache provide a steady advantage in CPU-bound rendering.

PassMark tests reveal a more varied picture. The largest Intel win is in physics simulation, where it scores 1055 versus 750, a 40.7% blowout. Prime number finding is nearly as lopsided: 61 versus 44, a 38.6% margin. Floating-point math shows Intel ahead by 35.8% (33510 vs 24681), and integer math by 9.9% (43038 vs 39163). Multi-threaded performance is an Intel win at 14687 versus 13507, an 8.7% margin. Data compression gives Intel an 8.3% edge (168043 vs 155164). However, the AMD chip takes random string sorting by 8% (18010 vs 16569), extended instructions by 4.3% (11923 vs 11407), and data encryption by 1.2% (8603 vs 8496). The single-thread PassMark test is a narrow AMD win at 3644 versus 3609, a 1% margin, with the same result in the duplicate singlethread test.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core i3-13100F scores 12458, which is 6.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE’s 11705.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Radeon 740M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i3-13100F has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Q: Which CPU wins in PassMark single-thread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE scores 3644, narrowly beating the Intel Core i3-13100F’s 3609 by 1%.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two in any benchmark?

A: In PassMark physics simulation, the Intel chip leads by 40.7%, scoring 1055 versus 750 for the AMD chip.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE supports ECC memory; the Intel Core i3-13100F does not.

Q: How does memory support differ between the two?

A: The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD chip supports only DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i3-13100F | AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 4 |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-S | Phoenix2 |

| Process Node | 10 nm (Intel) | 4 nm (TSMC) |

| Transistors | Not specified | 20,900 million |

| Die Size | 163 mm² | 137 mm² |

| Base Clock | 3.40 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 58 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket AM5 |

| L1 Cache (per core) | 80 KB | 64 KB |

| L2 Cache (per core) | 1.25 MB | 1 MB |

| L3 Cache (shared) | 12 MB | 8 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 only |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 83.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon 740M |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2024-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | $109 | Not specified |

The data shows two capable 4-core processors with distinct platform trade-offs. The Intel chip is faster in most compute-intensive benchmarks, particularly rendering and physics, but demands a discrete GPU and draws more power. The AMD chip offers integrated graphics, ECC support, lower TDP, and a smaller die, making it a better fit for compact or power-sensitive builds, even if it trails in raw multi-threaded output. Both sit at the 71st percentile in performance versus all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores are nearly identical at 17653 for Intel and 17614 for AMD. The choice comes down to workload and system priorities rather than overall performance class.