AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE vs Intel Core 5 320 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a clear split personality between these two processors. The Intel Core 5 320 wins 13 of the 17 recorded comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE takes only 4. However, the magnitude of those wins tells a more nuanced story than the raw count suggests.

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE's most decisive victory comes in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 11705 against the Intel's 6197, a massive 88.9% advantage. This is the single largest delta in the entire comparison. The AMD chip also leads in Cinebench R15 multi-core (1179 vs 1054, an 11.9% edge) and in PassMark integer math (39163 vs 32323, a 21.2% advantage). Its fourth win is in PassMark data compression (155164 vs 148779, a 4.3% margin).

The Intel Core 5 320 counters with a broad sweep of victories, many of them substantial. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Intel scores 276 against the AMD's 166, a 39.9% lead. PassMark floating point math shows a 42440 to 24681 result, a 41.8% gap favoring Intel. The Intel also dominates in PassMark find prime numbers (110 vs 44, a 60% delta) and PassMark physics (1221 vs 750, a 38.6% edge).

Interestingly, the two processors split the Cinebench R20 results. Intel wins both multi-core (5462 vs 4916, a 10% margin) and single-core (771 vs 693, a 10.1% edge), yet AMD wins R23 multi-core by a landslide. This inconsistency suggests the workloads scale differently across benchmark versions, with the AMD chip's advantage emerging specifically in the R23 multi-threaded test.

The closest contest is PassMark random string sorting, where Intel edges AMD by only 0.2% (18038 vs 18010). PassMark data encryption favors Intel by 21.7% (10984 vs 8603), and extended instructions go to Intel by 10.1% (13262 vs 11923). PassMark single-thread shows Intel ahead by 9.9% (4045 vs 3644), a result mirrored in the duplicate singlethread entry.

Overall average benchmark scores place the Intel Core 5 320 at 18023 versus the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE at 17614, a 2.3% gap. The Intel sits in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD lands at the 71st percentile. The nearest rivals for each processor reinforce this picture: the AMD's closest competitor is the Intel Core i3-14100T (delta of -0.2%), while the Intel Core 5 320's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (delta of +0.2%).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE uses a 4-core, 8-thread configuration based on Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix2. It is built on TSMC's 4 nm process and contains 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The Intel Core 5 320 uses a 6-core, 6-thread setup with Wildcat Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 3 nm process. Notably, the Intel chip has no hyperthreading, which explains why its thread count equals its core count.

Clock speeds differ sharply. The AMD starts at a 3.50 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.90 GHz. The Intel has a much lower 1.50 GHz base clock but boosts to 4.60 GHz. This lower base clock suggests the Intel relies heavily on boost behavior for performance, while the AMD maintains higher sustained frequencies.

Cache layouts are also distinct. The AMD provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel offers 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2 total, and 6 MB of shared L3. The AMD's per-core L2 allocation gives it 4 MB total, versus Intel's 2.5 MB, which partially explains its multi-core strength.

Memory architecture diverges significantly. The AMD supports DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X but uses a single-channel bus with only 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD also supports ECC memory, while the Intel does not.

Thermal design points contrast sharply: the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE has a 35 W TDP, while the Intel Core 5 320 draws just 15 W. This makes the Intel substantially more power-efficient on paper, though the AMD's higher TDP enables its sustained multi-core performance.

I/O capabilities favor the AMD. It offers PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel provides only 6 lanes. The AMD uses the AM5 socket, whereas the Intel uses BGA 1516, a soldered mobile package. The AMD integrates Radeon 740M graphics, while the Intel includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores.

Release timing also differs: the AMD launched in April 2024, while the Intel is dated April 2026. Both are currently marked as active production. The Intel carries a launch MSRP of $340, while no MSRP is recorded for the AMD.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE leads in Cinebench R23 multi-core with 11705 against the Intel's 6197, an 88.9% advantage. It also wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by 11.9% and PassMark integer math by 21.2%.

Q: Where does the Intel Core 5 320 demonstrate its biggest advantage?

A: The Intel wins PassMark find prime numbers by 60% (110 vs 44) and PassMark floating point math by 41.8% (42440 vs 24681). It also leads Cinebench R15 single-core by 39.9% (276 vs 166).

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Core 5 320 has an average benchmark score of 18023, which is 2.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE's 17614. The Intel sits in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD sits in the 71st.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core 5 320 has 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning it lacks simultaneous multithreading.

Q: Which processor supports more memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE offers 83.2 GB/s with a dual-channel DDR5 bus, while the Intel Core 5 320 provides 59.7 GB/s over a single-channel bus supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: How do their power requirements differ?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE has a 35 W TDP, while the Intel Core 5 320 has a 15 W TDP. The Intel's lower power draw aligns with its mobile BGA 1516 socket design, while the AMD uses the desktop AM5 socket.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE | Intel Core 5 320 |

|---------------|-------------------|------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 3.50 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Wildcat Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 3 nm (Intel) |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 137 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 192 KB total |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 2.5 MB total |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Support | Yes | No |

| PCIe Lanes | Gen 4, 14 lanes | Gen 4, 6 lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2024-04-15 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $340 |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE is the choice for sustained multi-threaded workloads. Its 88.9% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core is the standout result, and its 21.2% advantage in integer math suggests strength in calculation-heavy tasks. The 11.9% win in Cinebench R15 multi-core reinforces this pattern. Data compression also favors the AMD by 4.3%, making it suitable for file archiving and compression pipelines.

The Intel Core 5 320 excels at single-threaded and floating-point workloads. Its 39.9% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core and 14.2% advantage in R23 single-core indicate strong per-core performance. The 41.8% margin in floating point math makes it well-suited to scientific computing and graphics processing. The 60% edge in prime number finding points to strong integer throughput in specific algorithms, and the 21.7% lead in data encryption suggests robust cryptographic performance.

For power-sensitive applications, the Intel's 15 W TDP versus the AMD's 35 W gives it a clear efficiency advantage. The Intel also wins the overall average benchmark score comparison (18023 vs 17614), placing it in the 72nd percentile versus the AMD's 71st. However, the AMD's dual-channel memory and higher PCIe lane count make it more suitable for desktop builds requiring expandability.

The Intel Core 5 320 also wins several mid-range tests: PassMark multithread by 12.6% (15450 vs 13507), PassMark extended instructions by 10.1% (13262 vs 11923), and PassMark physics by 38.6% (1221 vs 750). The random string sorting test is nearly tied at 0.2% in Intel's favor.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core 5 320 as the more balanced processor overall. It wins 13 of 17 head-to-head comparisons, holds a 2.3% average benchmark lead, and achieves a higher percentile ranking (72nd vs 71st). Its single-thread dominance, floating-point strength, and low 15 W TDP make it the better all-around performer, especially for mobile platforms given its BGA 1516 socket.

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE is the specialist in multi-threaded rendering. Its 88.9% Cinebench R23 multi-core victory is decisive, and its dual-channel memory with ECC support positions it for workstation-style desktop tasks. The 35 W TDP and AM5 socket indicate a desktop-first design, and the integrated Radeon 740M offers competitive onboard graphics.

Choose the Intel Core 5 320 if you need single-thread speed, floating-point performance, or encryption throughput, or if power efficiency is a priority. Choose the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE if your workload is dominated by multi-threaded rendering, integer math, or data compression, and you want the flexibility of a desktop socket with ECC memory support. The data shows neither processor is universally superior; the right pick depends entirely on whether your applications favor the AMD's multi-core muscle or the Intel's per-core efficiency.