AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE vs Intel Core 5 223PTE Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and the Intel Core 5 223PTE?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How do the clock speeds compare between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE has a TDP of 35 watts, and the Intel Core 5 223PTE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: Which memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE supports DDR5 memory, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC, and the Intel Core 5 223PTE is built on a 10 nm process by Intel.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE has an average benchmark score of 17614, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, resulting in an average score of 0.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split between the two processors. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE is a fully measured part with a percentile rank of 71 among all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 17614. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i3-14100T and Intel Core i3-13100F, both average 17648 and 17653 respectively, putting the Ryzen 3 8300GE within 0.2% of those parts. This indicates a well understood performance profile that sits in the upper mid-range of the database.

The Intel Core 5 223PTE, in contrast, has no recorded benchmark results and an average score of zero. Its percentile rank of 50 is based on its specifications alone, but without measured data, no performance conclusions can be drawn. The Intel part does offer double the core count, 8 cores versus 4, and a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus 4.90 GHz. It also carries a larger shared L3 cache of 24 MB compared to 8 MB. These specifications suggest potential strength in heavily threaded workloads, but the database contains no measurements to confirm this.

For users selecting based on recorded performance, the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE is the only option with verified scores. The Intel Core 5 223PTE, with its higher TDP of 45 watts and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, presents a theoretically stronger multi-core configuration, but its lack of benchmark data means it cannot be ranked against the AMD part in any measured workload. The verdict from the database is straightforward: the Ryzen 3 8300GE delivers proven results, while the Core 5 223PTE remains an unmeasured quantity.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and the Intel Core 5 223PTE. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has an empty benchmarks array, so there are no recorded scores for Cinebench, Passmark, or any other workload. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE, however, has a full set of measurements across multiple test suites.

In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 3 8300GE scores 11705 in multi-core and 1652 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 4916 multi-core and 693 single-core. Cinebench R15 results show 1179 multi-core and 166 single-core. These numbers place the AMD part in a competitive position against its nearest rivals, all of which sit within 0.4% of its average score. The Intel Core i3-14100T averages 17648, a delta of -0.2% relative to the Ryzen 3 8300GE, meaning the AMD processor essentially matches that Intel part in overall average performance.

Passmark results for the Ryzen 3 8300GE include a multi-thread score of 13507 and a single-thread score of 3644. Its integer math score reaches 39163, floating point math reaches 24681, and extended instructions score 11923. Data compression scores 155164, data encryption scores 8603, and random string sorting scores 18010. Physics processing scores 750 and prime number finding scores 44. These figures provide a comprehensive performance picture for the AMD processor.

Because the Intel Core 5 223PTE has no scores in any of these tests, no wins can be assigned to either side. The head-to-head comparison is limited to specification analysis rather than measured performance. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE establishes a baseline with its recorded scores, but the absence of Intel data means the database cannot determine which processor would win in any specific workload.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE uses 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE uses 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD part has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Intel part has a lower base clock of 2.30 GHz but a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Thermal design power differs as well, with the AMD processor rated at 35 watts and the Intel processor rated at 45 watts. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE fits into AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE fits into Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, and the Intel processor uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with a higher bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCI Express capabilities differ, with the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE offering Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes and the Intel Core 5 223PTE offering Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics differ as well, with the AMD part using Radeon 740M and the Intel part using UHD Graphics 770.

Production status is Active for both, but release dates differ. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE was released on 2024-04-15, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE was released on 2026-03-08. The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $232. The AMD processor has no launch MSRP recorded in the database. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE belongs to the 8000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename. The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. No formal architecture name is recorded for the Intel part.

The manufacturing process separates the two clearly. The AMD processor is built on a 4 nm node by TSMC, with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The Intel processor is built on a 10 nm node by Intel, with no transistor count or die size recorded in the database. This process difference is significant, as the smaller node typically allows for higher density and efficiency, though the Intel part compensates with more cores and a higher boost clock.

Cache architecture reflects different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE uses 64 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 8 MB L3. The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 24 MB L3. The Intel part has three times the shared L3 cache, which can benefit workloads that repeatedly access a large working set.

The AMD processor integrates the Radeon 740M graphics solution, while the Intel processor integrates UHD Graphics 770. The memory controllers differ in scope, with AMD supporting only DDR5 and Intel supporting both DDR4 and DDR5. The PCIe implementation also differs, with AMD providing Gen 4 across 14 lanes and Intel providing Gen 5 across 16 lanes.

The generation labels in the database describe the AMD part as Ryzen 3 (Zen 4 Phoenix) and the Intel part as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake). Both are desktop market segments with active production status. The Intel part carries the part number SA4QL, while the AMD part carries the part number 100-000001496. These architectural differences, combined with the core and clock differences, define the two parts as distinct approaches to desktop processing, though only the AMD processor has measured data to support performance analysis.