AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE compare to the Intel Core 3 201TE in terms of overall benchmark positioning?

A: The Ryzen 3 8300GE sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the Core 3 201TE is at the 50th percentile. The Ryzen chip has an average benchmark score of 17,614, whereas the Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, making direct score comparisons impossible.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for both processors?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and the Intel Core 3 201TE have 4 cores and 8 threads. Despite similar core configurations, their architectural designs differ significantly.

Q: What process nodes do these chips use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the Intel Core 3 201TE uses Intel's 10 nm process. The Ryzen chip contains 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, whereas the Intel chip has a 163 mm² die with no transistor count listed.

Q: How do their cache hierarchies differ?

A: The Ryzen 3 8300GE has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. The Core 3 201TE has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. The Intel chip offers larger cache allocations at each level.

Q: What memory and PCIe support does each processor provide?

A: The Ryzen 3 8300GE supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel access and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, along with PCIe Gen 4 (14 lanes). The Core 3 201TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel access and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, plus PCIe Gen 5 (16 lanes).

Q: What integrated graphics are included?

A: The AMD chip features Radeon 740M graphics, while the Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 730. Both are desktop processors with active production status and locked multipliers.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE belongs to the 8000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process, packing 20,900 million transistors into a 137 mm² die. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, which indicates a different design lineage, and is built on Intel's own 10 nm process with a 163 mm² die.

The cache structures reveal distinct design priorities. AMD allocates 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Intel provides 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. The Intel chip offers roughly 50% more L3 cache and larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations, which could influence workloads that benefit from repeated data access.

Clock speeds differ notably. The Ryzen 3 8300GE has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Core 3 201TE operates at 2.90 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost. The AMD part runs at higher frequencies across the board, which typically translates to stronger single-thread performance, though the Intel chip's larger cache may offset some of that advantage.

The memory subsystem also diverges. AMD supports only DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe capabilities favor Intel with Gen 5 across 16 lanes, compared to AMD's Gen 4 across 14 lanes. Both platforms support ECC memory and use dual-channel memory buses.

The Ryzen 3 8300GE integrates Radeon 740M graphics, whereas the Core 3 201TE includes UHD Graphics 730. Both processors have locked multipliers and target the desktop market segment. The AMD chip uses Socket AM5, while the Intel chip uses Socket 1700, meaning they require different motherboards.

The Verdict

The recorded data positions the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE as the higher-performing part, with a 71st percentile ranking versus the Core 3 201TE's 50th percentile. The Ryzen chip also has concrete benchmark results across multiple tests, while the Intel chip has no recorded scores in the database. This absence of data for the Core 3 201TE means its real-world performance cannot be verified from the database.

Users seeking a processor with validated performance should consider the Ryzen 3 8300GE, which shows an average benchmark score of 17,614. The chip's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-14100T with an average score of 17,648 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i3-13100F at 17,653 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i7-1255U at 17,656 (0.2% higher), and the AMD EPYC 9374F at 17,693 (0.4% higher). This places the Ryzen 3 8300GE within a tight cluster of similarly performing processors.

For users prioritizing PCIe Gen 5 connectivity and flexible memory options, the Core 3 201TE offers those capabilities. Its larger L3 cache of 12 MB and higher TDP of 45 watts compared to 35 watts on the AMD part suggest it may sustain heavier workloads, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The Ryzen 3 8300GE's higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz versus 4.60 GHz on the Intel chip, combined with its smaller 4 nm process node, indicates better power efficiency potential. However, the Intel part's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides broader platform compatibility.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and Intel Core 3 201TE differ across nearly every specification field:

• Process Node: AMD uses 4 nm (TSMC), Intel uses 10 nm (Intel)
• Transistors: AMD has 20,900 million, Intel has none listed
• Die Size: AMD measures 137 mm², Intel measures 163 mm²
• Base Clock: AMD runs at 3.50 GHz, Intel at 2.90 GHz
• Boost Clock: AMD reaches 4.90 GHz, Intel reaches 4.60 GHz
• TDP: AMD draws 35 watts, Intel draws 45 watts
• L1 Cache: AMD provides 64 KB per core, Intel provides 80 KB per core
• L2 Cache: AMD provides 1 MB per core, Intel provides 1.25 MB per core
• L3 Cache: AMD provides 8 MB shared, Intel provides 12 MB shared
• Memory Support: AMD supports DDR5 only, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5
• Memory Bandwidth: AMD delivers 83.2 GB/s, Intel delivers 76.8 GB/s
• PCIe: AMD offers Gen 4 with 14 lanes, Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes
• Integrated Graphics: AMD has Radeon 740M, Intel has UHD Graphics 730
• Socket: AMD uses Socket AM5, Intel uses Socket 1700
• Release Date: AMD launched on 2024-04-15, Intel launched on 2025-01-12
• Part Number: AMD is 100-000001496, Intel is SRPKDQ5CK

Both processors share 4 cores, 8 threads, dual-channel memory buses, ECC support, and locked multipliers.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and the Intel Core 3 201TE. The Intel chip has an empty benchmarks array, meaning no Cinebench or PassMark scores are recorded for it.

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE has extensive benchmark data. In Cinebench R23, it scores 11,705 in multicore and 1,652 in singlecore. Cinebench R20 results show 4,916 multicore and 693 singlecore. Cinebench R15 records 1,179 multicore and 166 singlecore.

PassMark tests reveal specific strengths. The chip scores 155,164 in data compression, 8,603 in data encryption, 11,923 in extended instructions, 44 in find prime numbers, 24,681 in floating point math, 39,163 in integer math, 13,507 in multithread, 750 in physics, 18,010 in random string sorting, and 3,644 in both single thread and singlethread tests.

Since the Core 3 201TE has no benchmark scores, the data cannot support a direct comparison of wins in each test category. The Ryzen 3 8300GE's results stand alone as the only measurable performance evidence between these two processors.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE wins in every measurable performance category because it is the only processor with benchmark scores. Its 71st percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 17,614 place it above the Core 3 201TE's 50th percentile.

The Ryzen 3 8300GE demonstrates particular strength in data compression with a score of 155,164, which is substantially higher than its other PassMark results. Its integer math score of 39,163 and floating point math score of 24,681 indicate robust arithmetic processing capabilities. The single thread score of 3,644 suggests strong per-core performance, likely benefiting from the higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

The Intel Core 3 201TE wins in specification-based comparisons. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes exceeds AMD's Gen 4 with 14 lanes, offering more modern connectivity. The larger 12 MB L3 cache versus AMD's 8 MB could benefit workloads with high cache locality. Support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory gives platform flexibility that AMD's DDR5-only support lacks. The higher 45 watt TDP, compared to AMD's 35 watts, may permit more sustained power delivery under load.

The Intel chip's larger L1 and L2 caches per core could provide advantages in single-threaded workloads that repeatedly access small data sets. Its 10 nm process node, while larger than AMD's 4 nm, still represents Intel's mature manufacturing technology.

Without benchmark data for the Core 3 201TE, the database cannot confirm whether its architectural advantages translate into real performance wins. The Ryzen 3 8300GE's validated scores make it the only processor with proven performance in the database, while the Core 3 201TE remains an unmeasured quantity.