AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X. The head-to-head comparison field is empty, and the Ryzen Embedded 9900X has no recorded benchmark scores in any of the standard test suites. This means a direct numerical comparison of Cinebench R15, R20, R23, or PassMark scores cannot be performed based on the available data.

What the data does provide is a full set of benchmark results for the Ryzen 3 8300GE. In Cinebench R23, the 8300GE records a multicore score of 11705 and a singlecore score of 1652. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 4916 and the singlecore score is 693. The Cinebench R15 results show a multicore score of 1179 and a singlecore score of 166. These figures establish a baseline for what the 4-core, 8-thread processor can deliver.

For the Ryzen Embedded 9900X, the database lists its average benchmark score as 0, which reflects the absence of recorded benchmark data rather than an actual performance measurement. The percentile ranking for the 9900X is listed at 50, while the 8300GE sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database. These percentile figures indicate that the 8300GE ranks higher relative to the full database population, but this comparison is complicated by the fact that the 9900X has no benchmark entries to support its percentile calculation.

The nearest rivals for the 8300GE provide some context. The Intel Core i3-14100T has an average score of 17648, which is 0.2% higher than the 8300GE's average of 17614. The Intel Core i3-13100F and Intel Core i7-1255U both average 17653 and 17656 respectively, each sitting 0.2% above the 8300GE. The AMD EPYC 9374F averages 17693, which is 0.4% higher. These deltas are all within a narrow band, suggesting the 8300GE performs competitively against these specific rivals despite having fewer cores than the EPYC part.

Where Each One Wins

Without direct benchmark scores for the Ryzen Embedded 9900X, the analysis must rely on the recorded specifications and the benchmark data available for the 8300GE.

The Ryzen 3 8300GE shows its strengths in the PassMark suite. It records a data compression score of 155164, a floating point math score of 24681, and an integer math score of 39163. The multithread score of 13507 and single thread score of 3644 indicate balanced performance across both threaded and single-threaded workloads. The data encryption score of 8603 and extended instructions score of 11923 suggest solid capability in security and SIMD-heavy tasks. The find prime numbers score of 44 is notably low, which may indicate a weakness in certain integer-heavy algorithms.

The Ryzen Embedded 9900X, by specification, uses 12 cores and 24 threads, which is triple the core count and thread count of the 8300GE. Its base clock of 4.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz are both higher than the 8300GE's 3.50 GHz base and 4.90 GHz boost. The 9900X also carries a larger L3 cache at 64 MB compared to 8 MB for the 8300GE. These specifications suggest that in workloads that scale with core count, cache capacity, or clock speed, the 9900X would have an advantage. However, without recorded benchmark scores, the exact magnitude of that advantage cannot be quantified from the database.

The 8300GE does have one clear advantage in the recorded data: its TDP of 35 watts is substantially lower than the 9900X's 120 watts. The 8300GE also uses a smaller die at 137 mm² compared to the 9900X's 2x 70.6 mm² configuration. For power-constrained environments, the 8300GE is the proven performer with a full benchmark suite behind it.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and microarchitectures. The Ryzen 3 8300GE is part of the 8000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix2. The Ryzen Embedded 9900X is part of the 9000 series and uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Granite Ridge. Both are built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC, but the transistor counts differ: the 8300GE has 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, while the 9900X has 16,630 million transistors across a 2x 70.6 mm² configuration.

The cache hierarchies are distinct. The 8300GE provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The 9900X provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of L3. The larger L3 cache on the 9900X is a significant architectural difference, particularly for workloads that benefit from larger working sets.

Memory support is similar on paper: both support DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. The memory bandwidth figures differ slightly, with the 8300GE rated at 83.2 GB/s and the 9900X at 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory, which is a notable feature for embedded and workstation use cases.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. The 8300GE uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the 9900X uses Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only). The newer PCIe generation on the 9900X provides higher potential bandwidth for peripherals and accelerators.

Integrated graphics are present on both, but they are not identical. The 8300GE features the Radeon 740M, while the 9900X features a generic Radeon Graphics solution. The 8300GE has a locked multiplier, while the 9900X has an unlocked multiplier, which allows overclocking on the latter. The 9900X is also listed as having a different part number (100-000000662E) compared to the 8300GE (100-000001496).

The release dates show a generational gap: the 8300GE was released in April 2024, while the 9900X was released in October 2025. Both are listed as Active in production status and target the Desktop market segment. Both use the AMD Socket AM5.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two?

A: The 8300GE has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The 9900X has a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How does the cache size compare?

A: The 8300GE has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The 9900X has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of L3.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Ryzen 3 8300GE and the Ryzen Embedded 9900X support ECC memory.

Q: Is there a difference in PCIe support?

A: Yes, the 8300GE uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes, while the 9900X uses PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The 8300GE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the 9900X has a TDP of 120 watts.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X based on the recorded data:

• Series: 8000 series vs 9000 series
• Cores: 4 vs 12
• Threads: 8 vs 24
• Base Clock: 3.50 GHz vs 4.40 GHz
• Boost Clock: 4.90 GHz vs 5.60 GHz
• TDP: 35 W vs 120 W
• Architecture: Zen 4 vs (not listed)
• Codename: Phoenix2 vs Granite Ridge
• Generation: Ryzen 3 (Zen 4 (Phoenix)) vs Ryzen Embedded (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge))
• Transistors: 20,900 million vs 16,630 million
• Die Size: 137 mm² vs 2x 70.6 mm²
• L1 Cache: 64 KB per core vs 80 KB per core
• L3 Cache: 8 MB shared vs 64 MB
• Memory Bandwidth: 83.2 GB/s vs 89.6 GB/s
• PCIe: Gen 4, 14 Lanes vs Gen 5, 24 Lanes
• Integrated Graphics: Radeon 740M vs Radeon Graphics
• Release Date: 2024-04-15 vs 2025-10-06
• Multiplier Unlocked: false vs true
• Part Number: 100-000001496 vs 100-000000662E
• Benchmark Scores: Full suite recorded vs none recorded
• Percentile vs All CPUs: 71 vs 50
• Average Benchmark Score: 17614 vs 0
• Nearest Rivals: Listed (Intel Core i3-14100T, i3-13100F, i7-1255U, EPYC 9374F) vs none listed

The Verdict

The data presents an unusual comparison scenario. The Ryzen 3 8300GE has a complete benchmark profile, while the Ryzen Embedded 9900X has no recorded benchmark scores. This means any decision between the two must weigh the verified performance of the 8300GE against the specification-based potential of the 9900X.

For workloads where the 8300GE's benchmark results are relevant, it delivers a proven level of performance. Its average score of 17614 places it at the 71st percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals all fall within 0.4% of its average score. The 35 watt TDP makes it a low-power option for constrained environments. The 8300GE is the only one of the two with actual measured performance data in the database.

For the Ryzen Embedded 9900X, the absence of benchmark data means its performance cannot be verified from the database. Its specifications suggest substantial capability: 12 cores, 24 threads, a 5.60 GHz boost clock, 64 MB of L3 cache, PCIe Gen 5 support, and an unlocked multiplier. These are all indicators of a high-end processor, but the database does not confirm how they translate into real-world scores.

The percentile figures are telling. The 8300GE sits at the 71st percentile, while the 9900X sits at the 50th percentile. Given that the 9900X has no benchmark scores, the 50th percentile likely reflects a default or placeholder value rather than a measured ranking. The 8300GE's percentile is backed by actual data.

Users who need a verified, low-power processor with a complete benchmark history should consider the 8300GE. Users who require the core count, cache size, clock speeds, and PCIe generation of the 9900X will need to look to other sources for performance confirmation, as the database currently provides no measured scores for that processor. The choice hinges on whether verified data or specification-driven expectations take priority.