AMD Ryzen 3 7335U vs Intel Core i7-10850H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear split between these two mobile processors. Out of 17 head-to-head comparisons, the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U takes 11 wins, while the Intel Core i7-10850H secures 6. The margin of victory, however, tells a more nuanced story than the raw win count.

Starting with the Cinebench suite, the AMD chip dominates across the board. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Ryzen scores 1078 against Intel's 986, an 8.5% deficit for the Core i7. The single-core R15 test shows a similar gap: 152 for AMD versus 139 for Intel, again an 8.6% difference. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore result is 4495 for AMD versus 4110 for Intel, and the single-core test shows 634 versus 580. The pattern holds in Cinebench R23, where AMD posts 10703 multicore and 1511 single-core, against Intel's 9786 and 1381 respectively. Every Cinebench delta sits between 8.5% and 8.6% in AMD's favor, a remarkably consistent margin.

The Passmark suite reveals where Intel fights back. The largest Intel victory comes in random string sorting, where the Core i7 scores 21537 against AMD's 15361, a commanding 40.2% lead. Data compression also favors Intel heavily: 165882 versus 146309, a 13.4% advantage. Prime number finding goes to Intel by 13.9% (41 versus 36), and floating point math shows Intel ahead by 3.8% (25216 versus 24298). Extended instructions are essentially tied, with Intel's 10381 barely edging AMD's 10314, a 0.6% margin.

AMD's most dramatic win is in data encryption, where it scores 9335 against Intel's 3890. That is a 58.3% deficit for the Core i7, the single largest gap in either direction across all tests. AMD also wins integer math by 6.1% (42493 versus 39919), multithread by 7.5% (12592 versus 11643), and single-thread performance by 12.6% (3053 versus 2668). The physics test goes Intel's way at 718 versus 647, an 11% edge.

The average benchmark scores reflect AMD's overall edge: the Ryzen 3 7335U sits at 16827, while the Core i7-10850H averages 16204. Both processors place in the 70th percentile among all CPUs in the database, meaning they occupy the same performance tier despite the head-to-head differences.

Architecture Differences

These chips come from fundamentally different design eras. The Intel Core i7-10850H uses the Comet Lake architecture, specifically Comet Lake-H, built on Intel's 14 nm process. It is a 6-core, 12-thread part with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U uses the Zen 3+ architecture (codenamed Rembrandt-R), fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm node. It packs 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost of 4.30 GHz.

The process node gap is significant: 14 nm versus 6 nm. That difference helps explain how AMD achieves competitive or superior performance with fewer cores. The Ryzen's die size is listed at 208 mm², while Intel's is not recorded in the database.

Cache configurations differ notably. Both share the same 64 KB L1 cache per core. Intel has 256 KB L2 per core, while AMD doubles that to 512 KB per core. For L3, Intel offers 12 MB shared, AMD provides 8 MB shared. With four cores, AMD's per-core L3 allocation works out to 2 MB per core, while Intel's six cores share 12 MB, also 2 MB per core. The L2 advantage for AMD is the more meaningful difference.

Memory support diverges completely. Intel supports DDR4 with dual-channel access and a recorded bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s. AMD supports DDR5, also dual-channel, with a much higher 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. AMD also supports ECC memory, while Intel does not. PCIe capabilities differ as well: Intel offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Integrated graphics separate the two further. Intel pairs the Core i7 with UHD Graphics, while AMD includes the Radeon 660M. The socket types differ (Intel BGA 1440 versus AMD Socket FP7), and the TDP ratings reflect different power targets: 45 W for Intel, 28 W for AMD.

Release dates are roughly three years apart. Intel launched in April 2020, AMD in January 2023. Both remain in active production.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U is the clear choice for general productivity and single-threaded workloads. Its 12.6% lead in Passmark single-thread performance translates to snappier everyday response. The Cinebench results, both single and multicore, show AMD ahead by roughly 8.5% across every version of that benchmark. For rendering tasks measured by Cinebench, the Ryzen delivers consistent advantages despite having two fewer cores and four fewer threads.

The data encryption result is the standout: AMD's 9335 score versus Intel's 3890 represents a 58.3% gap. Any workload involving encryption, secure connections, or cryptographic operations will strongly favor the Ryzen. Integer math also goes AMD's way (42493 versus 39919), covering general calculation-heavy tasks. The multithread score of 12592 versus 11643 reinforces that AMD handles concurrent workloads well even with fewer threads.

The Intel Core i7-10850H wins in specific, targeted areas. Random string sorting shows a massive 40.2% advantage (21537 versus 15361), indicating strength in sorting algorithms and data organization tasks. Data compression favors Intel at 13.4% (165882 versus 146309), which matters for file archiving and database workloads. Prime number finding goes to Intel by 13.9%, and floating point math by 3.8%. The physics test shows Intel ahead by 11%, suggesting an edge in simulation or physics-based calculations.

For users running mixed workloads, the choice depends on the specific blend. Intel wins compression and sorting; AMD wins encryption, integer math, and everything in the Cinebench suite. The extended instructions test is effectively a tie (10381 versus 10314), so neither chip has a meaningful advantage in that area.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U wins the single-thread Passmark test with 3053 against Intel's 2668, a 12.6% advantage. The Cinebench single-core tests show AMD ahead by 8.5% to 8.6% across R15, R20, and R23.

Q: How does the multicore performance compare?

A: AMD leads in all Cinebench multicore tests: R15 at 1078 versus 986, R20 at 4495 versus 4110, and R23 at 10703 versus 9786. The Passmark multithread test also favors AMD at 12592 versus 11643, a 7.5% gap.

Q: Where does the Intel chip have its biggest advantage?

A: Random string sorting shows Intel ahead by 40.2% (21537 versus 15361). Data compression favors Intel by 13.4% (165882 versus 146309), and prime number finding by 13.9% (41 versus 36).

Q: Why does AMD win so many tests with only 4 cores?

A: The Ryzen uses a 6 nm process node compared to Intel's 14 nm, has twice the L2 cache per core (512 KB versus 256 KB), and supports DDR5 memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth versus Intel's DDR4 at 46.9 GB/s. These architectural advantages offset the core count difference.

Q: Is the Intel chip more power-hungry?

A: The recorded TDP is 45 W for Intel and 28 W for AMD. The database does not provide efficiency metrics beyond these figures, but the power target difference is substantial.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i7-10850H does not.

Specification Differences

The two chips differ on nearly every technical specification. Core counts: 6 for Intel, 4 for AMD. Threads: 12 versus 8. Base clock: 2.70 GHz for Intel, 3.00 GHz for AMD. Boost clock: 5.10 GHz for Intel, 4.30 GHz for AMD. TDP: 45 W versus 28 W.

Process node: Intel uses 14 nm, AMD uses 6 nm. Foundry: Intel fabricates its own chip, AMD uses TSMC. Die size is recorded only for AMD at 208 mm². L2 cache: 256 KB per core for Intel, 512 KB per core for AMD. L3 cache: 12 MB shared for Intel, 8 MB shared for AMD.

Memory support: DDR4 for Intel, DDR5 for AMD. Memory bandwidth: 46.9 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. ECC support: no for Intel, yes for AMD. PCIe: Gen 3 with 16 lanes for Intel, Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD. Integrated graphics: UHD Graphics for Intel, Radeon 660M for AMD.

Socket: Intel BGA 1440, AMD Socket FP7. Release date: April 2020 for Intel, January 2023 for AMD. Both are mobile segments, active production, and locked multipliers.

The Verdict

The data points to the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U as the more capable processor overall. Its 11-6 win count in head-to-head tests, combined with an 8.5% to 8.6% advantage across every Cinebench workload, makes it the stronger all-rounder. The average benchmark score confirms this: 16827 for AMD versus 16204 for Intel.

Users who prioritize encryption, single-threaded responsiveness, or modern memory support should choose the Ryzen. The 58.3% lead in data encryption and 12.6% lead in single-thread performance are decisive. The DDR5 memory support and ECC capability add further appeal for professional or security-focused workloads.

The Intel Core i7-10850H remains relevant for specific tasks. Its 40.2% advantage in random string sorting and 13.4% lead in data compression make it preferable for database-style operations or archiving work. Prime number finding and floating point math also favor Intel by 13.9% and 3.8% respectively. Users running those particular workloads will find the Core i7 more capable.

Both chips sit in the 70th percentile of all CPUs in the database, so they occupy the same competitive tier. The choice comes down to workload mix. For general use, rendering, encryption, and modern platform features, the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U is the data-supported pick. For compression, sorting, and physics-based tasks, the Intel Core i7-10850H holds clear advantages. The newer 6 nm process, higher memory bandwidth, and consistent Cinebench wins make AMD the safer recommendation for most buyers.