AMD Ryzen 3 7335U vs Intel Core i5-11400F Comparison

The Intel Core i5-11400F and AMD Ryzen 3 7335U occupy different corners of the processor market, one a desktop part and the other a mobile chip. The data shows a clear overall winner in raw performance, but the choice is not as simple as picking the higher benchmark score. The Intel part wins 15 of the 17 head-to-head tests, yet the AMD chip takes the single-thread crown in PassMark and operates in a completely different power envelope. This analysis breaks down where each processor excels, what separates them architecturally, and who should buy which.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-11400F is the decisive winner in almost every multi-threaded and compute-heavy workload. Its advantages range from a modest 9.8% lead in PassMark data encryption to a massive 57% lead in random string sorting. The largest deltas appear in integer-heavy and extended instruction tasks, where the Intel part leads by 35.6% in integer math, 40.5% in floating point math, and 45.2% in extended instructions. This pattern holds across all Cinebench versions, with the Intel part consistently scoring 34% higher than the AMD chip in both single-core and multi-core tests.

The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U wins only two tests, and both are the PassMark single-thread benchmarks. Its score of 3053 beats the Intel part's 2981 by 2.4%. This is a narrow but real victory, suggesting that the AMD architecture has a slight edge in lightly threaded, short-burst workloads that do not scale with additional cores. However, this single-thread advantage does not translate into wins elsewhere, as the Intel part counters with a 34% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core.

The use-case split is straightforward. For rendering, compiling, data compression, or any task that uses multiple threads, the Intel Core i5-11400F is the clear choice. For applications that are purely single-threaded and sensitive to clock speed, the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U holds a small edge, though the Intel part still wins Cinebench single-core tests by a wide margin.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The Intel Core i5-11400F is a desktop chip built on Rocket Lake architecture using Intel's 14 nm process, with a die size of 276 mm². It features 6 cores and 12 threads, a base clock of 2.60 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U is a mobile processor using Zen 3+ architecture on TSMC's 6 nm process, with a die size of 208 mm². It has 4 cores and 8 threads, a base clock of 3.00 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

The cache configurations differ significantly. The Intel part allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 12 MB of shared L3. The AMD part uses 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has more total cache, which contributes to its higher multi-threaded throughput.

Memory support is another differentiator. The Intel part uses DDR4 memory with dual-channel support and a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The AMD part uses DDR5 with dual-channel support and a higher bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not. Both processors use PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes available from the CPU.

The AMD chip includes integrated Radeon 660M graphics, while the Intel part has no integrated graphics at all. This matters for system builders who want a compact build without a discrete GPU. The Intel part requires a separate graphics card, while the AMD mobile chip can drive a display on its own.

The power and market positions are also distinct. The Intel part has a TDP of 65 W, is marked as end-of-life, and launched on March 15, 2021, with a launch MSRP of $157. The AMD part has a TDP of 28 W, is active in production, and launched on January 3, 2023. The AMD chip targets thin-and-light laptops, while the Intel chip targets desktop towers with more cooling headroom.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results are remarkably consistent. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Intel part scores 1445 against the AMD's 1078, a 34% advantage. Single-core tells the same story: 204 versus 152, a 34.2% lead for Intel. Cinebench R20 repeats this pattern with 6022 versus 4495 in multi-core and 850 versus 634 in single-core, both 34% and 34.1% leads respectively. Cinebench R23 shows 14340 versus 10703 in multi-core and 2024 versus 1511 in single-core, both 34% leads.

The PassMark suite shows where the Intel part really pulls ahead. Random string sorting is the biggest win at 57%, with scores of 24124 versus 15361. Extended instructions follow at 45.2% (14976 versus 10314). Floating point math comes next at 40.5% (34127 versus 24298). Integer math is 35.6% ahead (57624 versus 42493). The smallest Intel win is data encryption at 9.8% (10247 versus 9335). The only AMD wins are the two PassMark single-thread entries, both scoring 3053 versus 2981, a 2.4% edge.

The average benchmark scores reflect this overall dominance. The Intel part has an average benchmark score of 17177, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. The AMD part has an average of 16827, placing it in the 70th percentile. The nearest rivals corroborate this positioning: the Intel part sits within 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and Intel Core Ultra 7 164U, while the AMD chip trades places with the Intel Core i3-12100E and Intel Core i5-1235U within 0.4%.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core i5-11400F wins every multi-core test. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 14340 versus the AMD's 10703, a 34% advantage. PassMark multithread shows 16908 versus 12592, a 34.3% lead.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U win any benchmark?

A: Yes, it wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 3053 versus the Intel's 2981, a 2.4% margin. This is the only test where the AMD part comes out ahead.

Q: Can the Intel Core i5-11400F run without a discrete graphics card?

A: No, the Intel part has no integrated graphics. The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U includes Radeon 660M integrated graphics, so it can output video without a separate GPU.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel part has a TDP of 65 W, while the AMD part has a TDP of 28 W. The AMD chip is designed for mobile use with a much lower power draw.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-11400F does not list ECC support.

Q: How do the average scores compare?

A: The Intel part has an average benchmark score of 17177, and the AMD part scores 16827. Both sit near the 70th percentile of all CPUs, with Intel at 71 and AMD at 70.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-11400F is the superior processor for raw performance. It wins 15 of 17 head-to-head tests, including all Cinebench versions and the majority of PassMark workloads. Its 34% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 57% lead in random string sorting make it the obvious choice for rendering, encoding, and data manipulation tasks. The only downside is the lack of integrated graphics, which means it requires a dedicated GPU for any system build.

The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U is the better choice for mobile applications. Its 28 W TDP makes it suitable for thin laptops where power efficiency is critical. Its 2.4% single-thread win in PassMark is a minor point, but the integrated Radeon 660M graphics and ECC memory support add practical value for users who need a compact, low-power system. The higher memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s with DDR5 support is also a forward-looking feature.

For a desktop builder who wants maximum performance per dollar and already owns a graphics card, the Intel Core i5-11400F is the clear pick. For a laptop buyer who prioritizes portability and battery life over raw compute, the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U is the appropriate choice. The data does not support picking the AMD chip for any desktop workload, as it loses every multi-threaded test and most single-threaded tests to the Intel part.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-11400F | AMD Ryzen 3 7335U |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.60 GHz | 3.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 28 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | AMD Socket FP7 |

| Architecture | Rocket Lake | Zen 3+ |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 276 mm² | 208 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon 660M |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2021-03-15 | 2023-01-03 |

| Launch MSRP | $157 | Not available |

| Part Number | SRKP1 | 100-000000537(FP7) / 100-000000549(FP7r2) |