AMD Ryzen 3 7335U vs AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS and AMD Ryzen 3 7335U are both 7000-series mobile processors built on the same Zen 3+ architecture, but they are tuned for different priorities. The benchmark data shows a clear split: the Ryzen 3 7335U wins 15 out of 17 head-to-head comparisons, while the Ryzen 5 7235HS takes only 2 wins. However, the magnitude and nature of those wins tell a more nuanced story than a simple tally would suggest.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 3 7335U is the overall performance leader in most workloads. It wins every Cinebench test, from R15 multicore (1078 vs 1050) to R23 singlecore (1511 vs 1470). It also dominates PassMark’s integer math (42493 vs 40174, a 5.5% lead) and floating-point math (24298 vs 23091, a 5% lead). The biggest margin comes in the physics test, where the 7335U scores 647 against the 7235HS’s 574 — an 11.3% advantage. This suggests the 7335U has a meaningful edge in simulation-style or physics-heavy tasks.

The Ryzen 5 7235HS, despite its higher 45W TDP, only wins in two specific areas: data compression (152168 vs 146309, a 4% lead) and extended instructions (10887 vs 10314, a 5.6% lead). These are niche but relevant workloads. Data compression benefits from the 7235HS’s higher base clock of 3.20 GHz versus the 7335U’s 3.00 GHz, and the extended instructions result indicates better handling of AVX or similar instruction sets. For users who routinely compress large files or run code that leverages wide SIMD instructions, the 7235HS is the better pick.

The overall average benchmark scores confirm the near-parity: the 7235HS averages 16902, while the 7335U sits at 16827. The 7235HS is 0.4% ahead in its own rival list, and the 7335U is 0.4% behind the 7235HS in its list. This is a statistical tie, but the distribution of wins matters — the 7335U is consistently faster in general-purpose tasks, while the 7235HS has two specific spikes.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in single-threaded performance?

A: The Ryzen 3 7335U wins every single-core test. In Cinebench R23 singlecore, it scores 1511 versus the 7235HS’s 1470, a 2.7% lead. PassMark single-thread shows 3053 vs 2873, a 5.9% advantage.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7235HS better at anything?

A: Yes, it wins two benchmarks: data compression (152168 vs 146309, 4% ahead) and extended instructions (10887 vs 10314, 5.6% ahead). These are its only head-to-head victories.

Q: How do their multi-core scores compare?

A: The 7335U leads in all multi-core tests. In Cinebench R23 multicore, it scores 10703 versus the 7235HS’s 10418, a 2.7% gap. PassMark multithread shows 12592 vs 12243, a 2.8% lead for the 7335U.

Q: What is the TDP difference, and does it matter for performance?

A: The 7235HS has a 45W TDP, while the 7335U is rated at 28W. Despite the higher power budget, the 7235HS does not win any general-purpose benchmark, indicating the 7335U is more efficient per watt in typical workloads.

Q: Do they share the same integrated graphics?

A: Yes, both use the Radeon 660M. There is no benchmark data in this comparison to differentiate their iGPU performance.

Q: Which CPU is better for gaming?

A: The data does not include gaming benchmarks. However, the 7335U’s lead in physics (647 vs 574, 11.3%) and floating-point math (24298 vs 23091, 5%) suggests it would handle game logic and physics calculations better, but this is an inference, not a direct measurement.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single win for the Ryzen 3 7335U is in PassMark’s find prime numbers test, where it scores 36 versus the 7235HS’s 31 — a 13.9% margin. This is a pure integer workload that stresses core efficiency and clock speed, and the 7335U’s higher boost clock of 4.30 GHz versus 4.20 GHz on the 7235HS likely explains the gap. Similarly, the physics test shows an 11.3% lead (647 vs 574), which is another clock-sensitive workload.

The Cinebench results are consistent but modest. Across R15, R20, and R23, the 7335U wins both single-core and multi-core by margins ranging from 2.6% to 2.7%. For example, Cinebench R15 multicore is 1078 vs 1050 (2.6%), and R23 singlecore is 1511 vs 1470 (2.7%). These are small but uniform advantages, suggesting the 7335U is simply better tuned for sustained rendering tasks despite its lower TDP.

The Ryzen 5 7235HS’s wins are more pronounced in percentage terms. Its data compression score of 152168 is 4% higher than the 7335U’s 146309. Its extended instructions score of 10887 is 5.6% higher than 10314. These are the only two tests where it leads, but the margins are larger than most of the 7335U’s Cinebench wins. Random string sorting is nearly identical (15361 vs 15294, 0.4% for the 7335U), indicating that memory or cache-bound operations perform almost equally.

The overall pattern is that the 7335U wins by small margins across a broad range of tasks, while the 7235HS wins by slightly larger margins in two specialized areas. The average benchmark score difference is negligible — 16902 vs 16827 — but the 7335U’s consistency makes it the more reliable performer for mixed workloads.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs share the same core and thread count: 4 cores and 8 threads. They also have identical cache configurations — 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Memory support is the same: DDR5, dual-channel, with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support. Both use AMD Socket FP7, PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the Radeon 660M integrated GPU. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The key differences are in clock speeds and power. The 7235HS has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, while the 7335U has a base of 3.00 GHz and a boost of 4.30 GHz. The 7235HS has a 45W TDP, the 7335U has a 28W TDP. The 7235HS has a slightly larger die size at 210 mm² versus 208 mm² for the 7335U. The 7235HS also has a different part number (100-000001507) compared to the 7335U’s two part numbers (100-000000537 for FP7 and 100-000000549 for FP7r2). The 7335U has a release date of January 3, 2023, while the 7235HS has no release date listed.

Architecture Differences

Both CPUs are built on the same Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. They share the same foundry, transistor count is not listed for either, and the die sizes are nearly identical (210 mm² vs 208 mm²). The L3 cache is the same at 8 MB shared, and there is no 3D V-Cache on either model. The instruction set support is presumably the same, given the identical architecture and generation designation.

The only architectural nuances come from the clock and power configuration. The 7335U’s higher boost clock (4.30 GHz vs 4.20 GHz) gives it a slight edge in single-threaded and lightly-threaded workloads, which is consistent with its wins in every single-core test. The 7235HS’s higher base clock (3.20 GHz vs 3.00 GHz) likely contributes to its data compression win, where sustained throughput benefits from a higher floor. The 45W TDP on the 7235HS does not translate into a performance advantage in the benchmark data, suggesting the 28W 7335U is better optimized for the measured workloads.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Ryzen 3 7335U is the better CPU for the vast majority of users. It wins 15 of 17 head-to-head tests, including every Cinebench benchmark, all single-thread tests, and all but two PassMark workloads. Its leads range from 0.4% in random string sorting to 13.9% in prime number finding. For general productivity, rendering, and everyday multitasking, the 7335U is the safer choice.

The Ryzen 5 7235HS is only worth considering for two specific use cases: data compression and extended instruction workloads. Its 4% lead in compression and 5.6% lead in extended instructions are real, but they come at the cost of a 45W TDP versus 28W, which means more heat and battery drain in a laptop. The 7235HS does not win a single Cinebench test, any PassMark math test, or the multithread test. Its overall average score (16902) is only 0.4% higher than the 7335U’s (16827), which is within the margin of error.

For a laptop buyer, the choice comes down to priorities. If you need the best all-around performance, especially in physics, floating-point math, and single-threaded tasks, the Ryzen 3 7335U is the clear winner. If you work primarily with compressed data or need maximum extended instruction throughput, the Ryzen 5 7235HS has a narrow but measurable advantage. Given the 7335U’s lower TDP and broader benchmark dominance, it is the more practical recommendation for most systems. The 7235HS is a niche part for niche workloads.