AMD Ryzen 3 7335U vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data reveals a clear split: the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U wins on modern single-threaded and newer multi-threaded workloads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 4600H dominates in legacy multi-core tests and memory-heavy operations. The Ryzen 3 7335U takes 6 wins, the Ryzen 5 4600H takes 9 wins, but the margins tell a more nuanced story.

The most striking result is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Ryzen 3 7335U scores 10703 against the Ryzen 5 4600H's 8072, a 32.6% advantage. This flips the expected outcome given the 4600H has 6 cores and 12 threads versus the 7335U's 4 cores and 8 threads. The single-core R23 result reinforces the trend: 1511 versus 1142.5, a 32.3% lead for the 7335U. These are the largest wins in either direction, and they show that the newer Zen 3+ architecture delivers substantial per-thread performance gains over Zen 2.

However, the older Cinebench R15 tests tell the opposite story. The Ryzen 5 4600H wins R15 multi-core with 1425 versus 1078, a 24.4% lead, and R15 single-core with 176 versus 152, a 13.6% lead. This discrepancy between R15 and R23 results is significant: it suggests the 7335U's advantage scales with workload complexity and newer instruction usage, while the 4600H's raw core count helps in simpler, more parallel-friendly tasks from that era.

In PassMark workloads, the Ryzen 5 4600H dominates most categories. Data compression shows the biggest gap: 202030 versus 146309, a 27.6% lead for the 4600H. Random string sorting follows closely at 21689 versus 15361, a 29.2% lead. Data encryption shows a 23.6% advantage (12217 versus 9335), and extended instructions give the 4600H a 20.3% edge (12942 versus 10314). The 4600H also wins in floating point math (26909 versus 24298, a 9.7% lead), integer math (45698 versus 42493, a 7% lead), and PassMark multithread (14228 versus 12592, an 11.5% lead).

The Ryzen 3 7335U fights back in PassMark single-thread tests with 3053 versus 2418, a 26.3% advantage. It also wins in prime number finding (36 versus 28, a 28.6% lead) and physics (647 versus 629, a 2.9% lead). These wins align with the Cinebench R23 results: the 7335U's single-core speed is its primary weapon, and it translates into better performance on latency-sensitive or branch-heavy workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 4600H is the choice for heavily parallel, memory-bandwidth-intensive tasks. Its 6 cores and 12 threads provide more execution resources, which shows in data compression, encryption, sorting, and general multithreaded PassMark scores. The 4600H also holds an edge in legacy Cinebench R15 tests, making it better suited for older software that was optimized around core counts rather than IPC improvements.

The Ryzen 3 7335U wins in modern rendering workloads. Cinebench R23 is the best proxy for current content creation, and the 7335U's 32.6% multi-core and 32.3% single-core leads are decisive. It also wins in single-threaded PassMark, prime number calculation, and physics simulation, which suggests better responsiveness in everyday applications, spreadsheets, and lightweight scientific tasks.

For gaming, the data is indirect but suggestive. The 7335U's 26.3% single-thread lead matters for titles that rely on one or two strong cores. The 4600H's higher multithread scores help in modern games that use many threads, but the 7335U's architecture advantage may compensate. The 7335U also has a newer integrated GPU (Radeon 660M versus Radeon RX Vega 6), though the database does not include direct GPU benchmarks.

Power efficiency is another differentiator. The 7335U has a 28 W TDP versus the 4600H's 45 W TDP. This means the 7335U achieves its wins while drawing less power, which is critical for thin-and-light laptops. The 4600H needs more power and cooling, making it better suited for larger chassis with active cooling designs.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and nodes. The Ryzen 3 7335U uses Zen 3+ architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process, with the codename Rembrandt-R. The Ryzen 5 4600H uses Zen 2 on a 7 nm TSMC process, codenamed Renoir. The node shrink gives the 7335U a transistor density advantage, even though the 4600H has 9,800 million transistors versus no listed count for the 7335U. Die size also differs: 208 mm² for the 7335U versus 156 mm² for the 4600H.

Core and thread counts differ: 4 cores and 8 threads for the 7335U, 6 cores and 12 threads for the 4600H. Both have the same L1 (64 KB per core) and L2 (512 KB per core) cache, plus 8 MB shared L3 cache. Base clocks are identical at 3.00 GHz, but boost clocks differ: 4.30 GHz for the 7335U versus 4.00 GHz for the 4600H. That 300 MHz boost advantage, combined with the newer architecture, explains the 7335U's single-thread dominance.

Memory support is a major split. The 7335U supports DDR5 with dual-channel memory and a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The 4600H supports DDR4 with dual-channel memory and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The 7335U also supports ECC memory, while the 4600H does not. PCIe generation differs: Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only) for the 7335U versus Gen 3 for the 4600H. This affects storage and GPU expansion capabilities.

Sockets differ: AMD Socket FP7 for the 7335U, AMD Socket FP6 for the 4600H. Both are mobile segments and both are production active. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 660M for the 7335U versus Radeon RX Vega 6 for the 4600H. Release dates are far apart: January 2023 for the 7335U, January 2020 for the 4600H. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in single-threaded tasks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U wins all single-thread benchmarks. It scores 1511 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus 1142.5 for the 4600H, a 32.3% lead. In PassMark single-thread, it scores 3053 versus 2418, a 26.3% lead.

Q: Why does the Ryzen 5 4600H win some multi-core tests despite having fewer wins overall?

A: The 4600H has 6 cores and 12 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads for the 7335U. Its PassMark multithread score is 14228 versus 12592, an 11.5% lead. In data compression, it scores 202030 versus 146309, a 27.6% lead. However, in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 7335U wins by 32.6%, showing that its newer architecture can overcome the core deficit in certain workloads.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Ryzen 3 7335U has a TDP of 28 W. The Ryzen 5 4600H has a TDP of 45 W. The 7335U delivers its benchmark wins while consuming 17 W less, making it more suitable for thinner laptops.

Q: Which CPU supports faster memory?

A: The Ryzen 3 7335U supports DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Ryzen 5 4600H supports DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The 7335U also supports ECC memory, which the 4600H does not.

Q: How do these CPUs compare in the overall database ranking?

A: Both CPUs are at the 70th percentile versus all CPUs. The 7335U has an average benchmark score of 16827, and the 4600H has an average score of 16341. The 7335U's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-1235U (0.3% ahead) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS (0.4% behind). The 4600H's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-10600KF (0.7% ahead) and the Intel Core i7-10850H (0.8% ahead).

Q: Which CPU is better for modern gaming?

A: The 7335U has a 26.3% single-thread advantage, which helps in games that depend on one or two cores. It also has a newer integrated GPU (Radeon 660M versus Radeon RX Vega 6). However, the 4600H's 11.5% multithread lead can help in games that scale across cores. The database does not include direct gaming benchmarks, so this is an inference from the compute data.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 7335U | AMD Ryzen 5 4600H |

|---------------|-------------------|-------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | AMD Socket FP6 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Zen 2 |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Renoir |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |

| Transistors | Not listed | 9,800 million |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | 156 mm² |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3 |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | Radeon RX Vega 6 |

| Release Date | January 2023 | January 2020 |

| Part Number | 100-000000537(FP7) and 100-000000549(FP7r2) | 100-000000100 |

The Verdict

The data points to a clear recommendation for different use cases. The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U is the superior processor for users who prioritize single-thread performance, modern rendering workloads, power efficiency, and future-proofing. Its 32.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 32.3% lead in R23 single-core are decisive for content creation and everyday responsiveness. The 28 W TDP makes it the better option for ultraportable laptops where battery life and thermals matter.

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600H remains the stronger choice for users who run legacy multi-threaded applications, compression, encryption, or sorting workloads. Its 27.6% lead in data compression, 29.2% lead in random string sorting, and 23.6% lead in data encryption show that its 6 cores and 12 threads provide real benefits in parallel data processing. The 45 W TDP requires a larger chassis, but the performance in those specific tasks is measurable.

The 7335U's higher boost clock (4.30 GHz versus 4.00 GHz), newer 6 nm process, DDR5 support, and PCIe Gen 4 make it the more modern platform. The 4600H's older Zen 2 architecture and DDR4 support limit its longevity, but its core count and transistor budget (9,800 million) still deliver competitive multithread scores.

For most modern users, the Ryzen 3 7335U is the better overall processor. The wins it secures are in workloads that matter today: Cinebench R23, single-threaded performance, and physics simulation. The Ryzen 5 4600H's wins are concentrated in PassMark categories that reflect older application patterns. Users with specific legacy multi-threaded workloads should consider the 4600H, but the 7335U offers a better balance of performance, efficiency, and platform features.