AMD Ryzen 3 7335U vs AMD Ryzen 5 4500 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 3 7335U

CORE STATE Rembrandt-R
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3 Base / 4.3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3+
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
AMD
AMD

Ryzen 5 4500

CORE STATE Renoir
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 2
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,078
1,378
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
152
194
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
4,495
5,744
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
634
810
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
10,703
13,677
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,511
1,930
passmark_data_compression
146,309
228,741
passmark_data_encryption
9,335
13,597
passmark_extended_instructions
10,314
15,166
passmark_find_prime_numbers
36
34
passmark_floating_point_math
24,298
29,405
passmark_integer_math
42,493
49,707
passmark_multithread
12,592
16,091
passmark_physics
647
726
passmark_random_string_sorting
15,361
23,989
passmark_single_thread
3,053
2,593
passmark_singlethread
3,053
2,593
3dmark_16_threads
N/A
4,795
3dmark_2_threads
N/A
1,400
3dmark_4_threads
N/A
2,682
3dmark_8_threads
N/A
4,077
3dmark_max_threads
N/A
4,795
3dmark_single_thread
N/A
711
geekbench_multicore
N/A
7,005
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
1,489

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 3 7335U vs AMD Ryzen 5 4500

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data presents a striking picture: the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 dominates the benchmark suite, winning 14 of the 17 recorded comparisons. The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U manages only three wins, and those are concentrated in very specific workloads. The most decisive victories for the Ryzen 5 4500 come in data compression and random string sorting, where it leads by 36% in both cases. The Ryzen 5 4500 scores 228,741 in Passmark data compression versus 146,309 for the Ryzen 3 7335U, and 23,989 versus 15,361 in random string sorting. These are substantial gaps that indicate a meaningful advantage in memory-intensive, multi-threaded operations.

The Cinebench results tell a consistent story across all three versions. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Ryzen 5 4500 scores 1,378 versus 1,078, a 21.8% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a similar pattern: 194 versus 152, a 21.6% gap. Moving to R20, the multicore scores are 5,744 versus 4,495 (21.7% difference), and single-core is 810 versus 634 (21.7% difference). The R23 results continue the trend: multicore 13,677 versus 10,703, and single-core 1,930 versus 1,511, both showing a 21.7% delta. This consistency across Cinebench versions suggests a fundamental throughput difference rather than a workload-specific quirk.

The Ryzen 3 7335U's wins are narrower but notable. In Passmark find prime numbers, it scores 36 versus 34, a 5.9% advantage. The more significant win comes in Passmark single-thread performance, where it scores 3,053 versus 2,593, a 17.7% lead. This single-thread score appears twice in the database (as passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread), confirming the result. The Ryzen 3 7335U also wins in Passmark physics with 647 versus 726? No, that is incorrect: the physics test shows the Ryzen 5 4500 winning with 726 versus 647, a 10.9% advantage. The Ryzen 3 7335U's three wins are exactly: find prime numbers (36 vs 34), single-thread (3,053 vs 2,593), and the duplicate single-thread entry.

The remaining benchmark categories all favor the Ryzen 5 4500 with varying margins. Data encryption shows 13,597 versus 9,335, a 31.3% gap. Extended instructions score 15,166 versus 10,314, a 32% difference. Floating point math is closer: 29,405 versus 24,298, a 17.4% gap. Integer math shows 49,707 versus 42,493, a 14.5% difference. The multithread test results in 16,091 versus 12,592, a 21.7% gap, matching the Cinebench multicore pattern.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 4500 is clearly the multi-threaded workhorse. Its wins span Cinebench multicore tests, data compression, encryption, extended instructions, floating point, integer math, multithread, physics, and random string sorting. This is a processor that excels when the workload can utilize multiple cores simultaneously. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,677 versus 10,703 represents a 2,974-point difference, which is substantial for productivity applications that scale with core count.

The Ryzen 3 7335U's wins are more specialized. Its single-thread score of 3,053 versus 2,593 indicates stronger per-core performance in lightly threaded tasks. This is particularly relevant for applications that rely on a single primary thread, such as certain legacy software or user interface responsiveness. The find prime numbers result, while only a 5.9% advantage, suggests that the Zen 3+ architecture handles this particular integer workload slightly better than Zen 2.

For gaming, the database does not include specific gaming benchmarks, but the Passmark physics test (726 vs 647) and floating point results (29,405 vs 24,298) suggest the Ryzen 5 4500 has an edge in physics simulation and floating point arithmetic, which are relevant to game logic and rendering calculations. However, the Ryzen 3 7335U's stronger single-thread performance could provide better frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios where a single thread is the bottleneck.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is significant. The Ryzen 3 7335U is built on Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, while the Ryzen 5 4500 uses Zen 2 with the Renoir codename. This generational gap is reflected in their process nodes: the Ryzen 3 7335U uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, while the Ryzen 5 4500 uses a 7 nm process, also from TSMC. The smaller process node typically allows for better power efficiency and potentially higher clock speeds at equivalent power draw.

The transistor counts differ dramatically: the Ryzen 5 4500 has 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die, while the Ryzen 3 7335U's transistor count is not recorded in the database, but its die size is 208 mm². The larger die size for the Ryzen 3 7335U, despite having fewer cores, suggests the inclusion of additional features, most likely the integrated graphics and the newer memory controller.

Cache configurations are identical in structure: both have 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. However, the core counts differ, so the total L1 and L2 cache is larger on the Ryzen 5 4500 due to its six cores versus four. The Ryzen 3 7335U includes Radeon 660M integrated graphics, while the Ryzen 5 4500 has no integrated graphics listed, which is consistent with its desktop market segment.

Specification Differences

The specification differences are numerous and impactful. The Ryzen 5 4500 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 7335U has 4 cores and 8 threads. This two-core, four-thread advantage is the primary driver of the multi-threaded benchmark wins. Base clocks differ: the Ryzen 5 4500 runs at 3.60 GHz base versus 3.00 GHz for the Ryzen 3 7335U. Boost clocks reverse the order: the Ryzen 3 7335U boosts to 4.30 GHz versus 4.10 GHz for the Ryzen 5 4500, which explains the single-thread win.

Thermal design power (TDP) shows a major divergence: the Ryzen 5 4500 is rated at 65 W, while the Ryzen 3 7335U is rated at 28 W. This suggests the Ryzen 3 7335U is designed for more power-constrained environments, likely thin-and-light laptops, while the Ryzen 5 4500 is a desktop part with more thermal headroom. The sockets are entirely different: the Ryzen 3 7335U uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Ryzen 5 4500 uses AMD Socket AM4. This means they are not interchangeable in any system.

Memory support differs fundamentally. The Ryzen 3 7335U supports DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Ryzen 5 4500 supports DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s. Both are dual-channel. The Ryzen 3 7335U also supports ECC memory, which the Ryzen 5 4500 does not. PCIe generations differ: the Ryzen 3 7335U has PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Ryzen 5 4500 has PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The Ryzen 5 4500 has an unlocked multiplier, while the Ryzen 3 7335U does not. Release dates are also distinct: the Ryzen 3 7335U was released on January 3, 2023, while the Ryzen 5 4500 was released on April 3, 2022. The Ryzen 5 4500 has a recorded launch MSRP of $129, while the Ryzen 3 7335U has no launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U wins the Passmark single-thread test with a score of 3,053 versus 2,593 for the AMD Ryzen 5 4500, a 17.7% advantage. This aligns with its higher boost clock of 4.30 GHz versus 4.10 GHz.

Q: How much faster is the Ryzen 5 4500 in multi-threaded Cinebench workloads?

A: In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Ryzen 5 4500 scores 13,677 versus 10,703 for the Ryzen 3 7335U, a 21.7% difference. The R15 and R20 multicore tests show nearly identical deltas of 21.8% and 21.7%, respectively.

Q: What memory types do these processors support?

A: The Ryzen 3 7335U supports DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Ryzen 5 4500 supports DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Both are dual-channel, but only the Ryzen 3 7335U supports ECC memory.

Q: Are these processors compatible with the same motherboard?

A: No. The Ryzen 3 7335U uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Ryzen 5 4500 uses AMD Socket AM4. These sockets are physically and electrically incompatible.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 4500 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Ryzen 5 4500's additional cores contribute to its multi-threaded benchmark dominance.

Q: What is the process node difference between these two chips?

A: The Ryzen 3 7335U is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, while the Ryzen 5 4500 uses a 7 nm process, also by TSMC. The newer node on the Ryzen 3 7335U allows for a lower TDP of 28 W versus 65 W for the Ryzen 5 4500.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 for users who prioritize multi-threaded performance. Its 21.7% average advantage across Cinebench multicore tests and 36% leads in data compression and random string sorting make it the stronger choice for content creation, data processing, and other heavily parallel workloads. The additional two cores and four threads, combined with a higher base clock of 3.60 GHz, provide a substantial throughput advantage that the Ryzen 3 7335U cannot overcome despite its architectural advantages.

The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U makes its case for single-threaded performance and power efficiency. Its 17.7% lead in Passmark single-thread and its 28 W TDP versus 65 W suggest it is better suited for thin-and-light laptops or systems where power consumption and heat generation are primary concerns. The DDR5 memory support and integrated Radeon 660M graphics also make it a more self-contained solution for compact systems that do not require a discrete GPU.

The database records show the Ryzen 3 7335U at the 70th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16,827, while the Ryzen 5 4500 sits at the 71st percentile with an average score of 17,333. The overall average scores are close, with the Ryzen 5 4500 leading by roughly 3%. The nearest rival data places the Ryzen 3 7335U alongside the Intel Core i3-12100E (0.2% faster) and Intel Core i5-1235U (0.3% slower), while the Ryzen 5 4500 is compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 210 (0.1% slower) and Intel Core 7 150U (0.4% faster).

The verdict is straightforward: choose the Ryzen 5 4500 for maximum multi-threaded throughput, especially in desktop systems where its 65 W TDP and AM4 socket are acceptable. Choose the Ryzen 3 7335U for portable or power-sensitive applications where its single-thread lead, DDR5 support, integrated graphics, and lower power envelope provide practical benefits. The data does not support a universal winner; the correct choice depends entirely on the workload and system constraints.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
3 7335U
5 4500
Core Specs
Cores
4
6 +50.0%
Threads
8
12 +50.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3
3.6 +20.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.3
4.1 -4.7%
Frequency (GHz)
3
3.6 +20.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.3
4.1 -4.7%
Multiplier
30
36 +20.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
512 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB (shared)
8 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PPT
—
88 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3+
Zen 2
Codename
Rembrandt-R
Renoir
Generation
Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))
Ryzen 5 (Zen 2 (Renoir))
Process Size
6 nm
7 nm
Transistors
—
9,800 million
Die Size
208 mm²
156 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
51.2 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP7
AMD Socket AM4
Chipsets
—
AMD 300 Series, AMD 400 Series, AMD 500 Series
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 660M
—
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$129
Part Number
100-000000537(FP7)100-000000549(FP7r2)
100-000000xxx
Package
FP7, FP7r2
µOPGA-1331
Tj Max
95°C
—
View Ryzen 3 7335U Details View Ryzen 5 4500 Details