AMD Ryzen 3 7330U vs Intel Xeon E-2286M Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear hierarchy between these two processors, with the Intel Xeon E-2286M taking all three recorded head-to-head wins. The most decisive margin appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Xeon scores 12,848 against the Ryzen 3 7330U's 6,230. That is a 51.5% deficit for the AMD part, meaning the Intel chip delivers roughly double the multi-threaded rendering throughput in this specific workload. For any task that scales across cores, this is not a close contest.

Geekbench multi-core shows a similar but slightly narrower gap. The Xeon E-2286M records 6,746, while the Ryzen 3 7330U manages 4,131. The delta here is 38.8% in favor of Intel. This aligns with the core count disparity, but the margin is worth noting because Geekbench's workload mix includes memory and cache-sensitive tests, not just pure compute. Even accounting for those factors, the Xeon's 8-core, 16-thread configuration outpaces the Ryzen's 4-core, 8-thread design by a substantial amount.

Single-core performance is where the story changes dramatically. In Geekbench single-core, the Xeon scores 1,537 and the Ryzen 3 scores 1,514. The Intel part wins by only 1.5%. That is effectively a tie in real-world terms. The Ryzen 3's Zen 3 architecture, with its higher IPC per clock, nearly erases the Xeon's 700 MHz boost clock advantage (5.00 GHz versus 4.30 GHz). If the AMD part had a higher thermal ceiling, it might have taken the lead here, but the recorded data shows a narrow Intel victory.

It is worth contextualizing these scores against the broader database. The Ryzen 3 7330U sits at the 57th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 3,958. The Xeon E-2286M sits at the 56th percentile, with an average of 3,822. Despite losing every head-to-head comparison, the Ryzen 3 actually has a slightly higher overall percentile ranking. This is because the database's average score includes a wider range of tests, and the Ryzen 3's efficiency-oriented design holds up well in workloads that favor lower power draw. The Xeon's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 4900H (delta 0%) and the Intel Core i7-8086K (delta 0.6%), while the Ryzen 3's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 (delta 0%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U (delta -0.3%). Both processors are clustered tightly with their peers, but the Xeon's multi-core dominance is the defining feature of this matchup.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 3 7330U is built on TSMC's 7 nm process, using the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Barcelo-R. It belongs to the 7000 series and the Ryzen 3 generation, specifically Zen 3 (Cezanne). The Intel Xeon E-2286M, by contrast, uses Intel's 14 nm process with the older Coffee Lake architecture, codenamed Coffee Lake-H, and belongs to the Xeon E-2200 series. The process node difference alone, 7 nm versus 14 nm, explains a significant portion of the power and efficiency gap between these parts.

The transistor counts tell a similar story. The Ryzen 3 packs 10,700 million transistors into a 180 mm² die. The Xeon E-2286M's transistor count is not recorded in the database, but it shares the same 180 mm² die size. This means the Ryzen 3 is placing far more transistors into the same physical space, a direct consequence of the denser 7 nm process. The practical effect is that the AMD chip achieves its performance at a 15 W TDP, while the Intel chip requires 45 W. That is a 3x power difference, and it reflects in the thermal and battery-life characteristics of any system using these processors.

Cache configurations also diverge significantly. Both chips have 64 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache differs: the Ryzen 3 has 512 KB per core, while the Xeon has 256 KB per core. The L3 cache is where the Xeon takes a clear lead, with 16 MB shared versus the Ryzen 3's 8 MB shared. For workloads that repeatedly access large datasets, the Xeon's larger L3 pool reduces memory stalls. However, the Ryzen 3's per-core L2 advantage helps with latency-sensitive single-threaded tasks.

Memory bandwidth is another differentiator. The Ryzen 3 supports dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth, while the Xeon E-2286M also supports dual-channel DDR4 but tops out at 42.7 GB/s. That is a 16.6% bandwidth advantage for the AMD part, which partially compensates for its smaller L3 cache. Both processors support ECC memory, which is unusual for a Ryzen 3 mobile part and typical for a Xeon workstation chip. Both also use PCIe Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes, so expansion capabilities are identical on paper.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Ryzen 3 7330U carries Radeon Graphics (Vega 4), while the Xeon E-2286M uses UHD Graphics P630. The database does not include graphics benchmarks, so no direct comparison is possible from this data. However, the Vega 4 in the Ryzen 3 is a newer design and generally more capable for media tasks, while the UHD P630 is a basic workstation-oriented GPU.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon E-2286M wins every benchmark in the head-to-head comparison, but the magnitude of those wins tells you where it is truly dominant. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 51.5% lead makes it the clear choice for CPU-bound rendering, video encoding, compilation, and any other workload that scales with core count. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration is simply in a different class than the 4-core, 8-thread Ryzen 3. For a workstation that sits on a desk and has access to continuous power, the Xeon's 45 W TDP is a non-issue, and the multi-core performance speaks for itself.

Geekbench multi-core, with its 38.8% Intel lead, reinforces this pattern. While the margin is smaller than in Cinebench, it still represents a substantial advantage for productivity applications that use multiple threads. The Xeon's larger 16 MB L3 cache helps in these mixed workloads, keeping more data close to the cores.

The Ryzen 3 7330U's best showing is in Geekbench single-core, where it trails by only 1.5%. This means the AMD chip is effectively competitive for day-to-day tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light coding, where single-thread performance matters most. The Zen 3 architecture's high IPC nearly offsets the Xeon's clock speed advantage. If the comparison included more single-threaded benchmarks, the Ryzen 3 might have secured a win in that category.

The power envelope is where the Ryzen 3 wins by default, even though it is not a benchmark score. At 15 W versus 45 W, the AMD part is designed for thin-and-light laptops, passive-cooled systems, or any environment where heat and battery life are primary constraints. The Xeon E-2286M, with its 45 W TDP and end-of-life production status, belongs in a powered workstation or a laptop with a robust cooling solution.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion: the Intel Xeon E-2286M is the faster processor in every measured benchmark, and the margin in multi-core workloads is overwhelming. If the task is rendering, compiling, or any heavily threaded workload, the Xeon's 51.5% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core is decisive. The 38.8% lead in Geekbench multi-core confirms that this advantage extends beyond a single benchmark. Anyone choosing between these two for a workstation should pick the Xeon without hesitation, provided power consumption is not a limiting factor.

The Ryzen 3 7330U is the right choice for a different use case. Its 15 W TDP makes it suitable for portable devices where battery life and thermal management take priority over raw performance. The 1.5% single-core gap to the Xeon means everyday responsiveness is nearly identical. The Ryzen 3 also offers higher memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s) and a more modern 7 nm process, which points to better efficiency per watt. For a laptop that spends most of its time on light to moderate tasks, the Ryzen 3 is the practical pick.

The production status is also worth noting. The Xeon E-2286M is end-of-life, while the Ryzen 3 7330U remains active. This affects long-term availability and platform support. The Ryzen 3 also has a launch MSRP of $623, though the Xeon's price is not recorded in the database. Both processors are locked (multiplier not unlocked), so overclocking is not an option for either.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2286M is significantly faster. It scores 12,848 in Cinebench R23 multi-core versus 6,230 for the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U, a 51.5% lead. In Geekbench multi-core, the Xeon scores 6,746 versus 4,131, a 38.8% lead.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U competitive in single-core performance?

A: It is very close. The Xeon E-2286M scores 1,537 in Geekbench single-core, while the Ryzen 3 scores 1,514, a margin of only 1.5%. For most single-threaded tasks, the difference is imperceptible.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Ryzen 3 7330U has a TDP of 15 W, while the Xeon E-2286M has a TDP of 45 W. The AMD part uses one-third the power, making it far better suited for portable devices.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U and the Intel Xeon E-2286M support ECC memory. Both also use dual-channel DDR4 and PCIe Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes.

Q: Which processor has more cache?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2286M has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, double the 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 7330U. However, the Ryzen 3 has 512 KB of L2 per core, double the Xeon's 256 KB per core.

Q: What is the production status of each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 7330U is active and currently in production. The Intel Xeon E-2286M is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer being manufactured.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 7330U | Intel Xeon E-2286M |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 8 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 45 W |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 42.7 GB/s |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics (Vega 4) | UHD Graphics P630 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2019-05-28 |

| Part Number | 100-000000944 | SRFCZ |