AMD Ryzen 3 7330U vs Intel Xeon D-2733NT Comparison

The Intel Xeon D-2733NT and AMD Ryzen 3 7330U occupy the same performance percentile (57th) yet are engineered for entirely different environments. The former is an 8-core Ice Lake-D server processor with 80W thermal headroom, while the latter is a 4-core Zen 3 mobile chip rated at just 15W. Benchmark averages are nearly identical—3984 versus 3958—but the underlying workloads, memory pathways, and feature sets could not diverge more sharply.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Xeon D-2733NT edges ahead with an average benchmark score of 3984, compared to 3958 for the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U. This 26-point gap is negligible, placing both parts at the 57th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How do the two chips compare in multi-core rendering?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Xeon D-2733NT scores 13775 against 6230 for the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U, a decisive 121.1% advantage for Intel. The Xeon’s 8 cores and 16 threads overwhelm the Ryzen’s 4 cores and 8 threads in this heavily parallel workload.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Xeon D-2733NT provides 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 7330U offers half that: 4 cores and 8 threads. Both support simultaneous multithreading.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 7330U boosts to 4.30 GHz, substantially higher than the Intel Xeon D-2733NT’s 3.20 GHz maximum. The Ryzen also starts at a higher base clock of 2.30 GHz versus 2.10 GHz for the Xeon.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon D-2733NT and AMD Ryzen 3 7330U support ECC memory. However, the Xeon uses quad-channel DDR4 with 85.3 GB/s bandwidth, while the Ryzen uses dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U includes integrated graphics—specifically Radeon Graphics (Vega 4). The Intel Xeon D-2733NT has no integrated graphics, consistent with its server/workstation market segment.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different foundries and process nodes. Intel fabricates the Xeon D-2733NT on its own 10 nm process, while AMD uses TSMC’s 7 nm node for the Ryzen 3 7330U. This node advantage helps AMD pack 10,700 million transistors into a 180 mm² die, though the Intel chip’s transistor count and die size are not documented in the data.

Architecturally, the Xeon D-2733NT is built on Ice Lake-D, the server variant of Intel’s Ice Lake architecture. Its codename is Ice Lake-D and it belongs to the Xeon D generation. The Ryzen 3 7330U uses Zen 3, with the codename Barcelo-R and generation listed as Ryzen 3 (Zen 3 (Cezanne)). This is a mobile-oriented design, whereas the Xeon targets server and workstation deployments.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The Intel part allocates 80 KB of L1 cache and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, with a shared 15 MB L3 cache. The AMD part provides 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, plus a smaller 8 MB shared L3 cache. Despite the Xeon’s larger caches, the Ryzen’s Zen 3 architecture is known for efficient core design, which helps close the gap in single-threaded scenarios.

Memory architecture is another major divergence. The Xeon D-2733NT supports quad-channel DDR4 with a theoretical bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s, while the Ryzen 3 7330U is limited to dual-channel DDR4 at 51.2 GB/s. PCIe capability follows suit: the Intel chip provides Gen 4 with 32 CPU-only lanes, whereas the AMD chip offers Gen 3 with 16 CPU-only lanes.

The process node, foundry, transistor count, die size, memory channel count, PCIe generation, and integrated graphics all differ between the two. The Xeon uses Intel BGA 2579 socket, while the Ryzen fits AMD Socket FP6. These are not interchangeable platforms.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison available is Cinebench R23 multi-core. Here, the Intel Xeon D-2733NT scores 13775, while the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U scores 6230. The delta is 121.1% in favor of Intel. This is a dominant victory for the Xeon, driven by its doubled core and thread count combined with a larger shared L3 cache and quad-channel memory bandwidth.

The Ryzen 3 7330U’s advantage in this matchup is entirely absent from the head-to-head data. The AMD chip does not win any of the recorded head-to-head benchmarks; the win count stands at 1 for Intel and 0 for AMD. However, the Ryzen’s higher boost clock—4.30 GHz versus 3.20 GHz—suggests it would perform better in single-threaded tasks, though no Cinebench R23 single-core result is provided for direct comparison.

The Ryzen 3 7330U does have additional benchmark results not shared with the Xeon: Geekbench multi-core scores 4131 and single-core scores 1514. These are not directly comparable to any Intel result in the fact pack, so they cannot be used to establish a head-to-head win. The Xeon, for its part, has Cinebench R15 and R20 scores (both multi- and single-core) that the Ryzen lacks.

What the data shows is that the Xeon D-2733NT is a multi-threaded powerhouse in this pairing, while the Ryzen 3 7330U compensates with higher clock speeds and a more modern process node. In the one shared benchmark, Intel wins by a wide margin, but the absence of single-threaded comparisons leaves the overall picture incomplete.

Specification Differences

The table below highlights every field where the two processors differ:

| Specification | Intel Xeon D-2733NT | AMD Ryzen 3 7330U |

|---|---|---|

| cores | 8 | 4 |

| threads | 16 | 8 |

| baseClock | 2.10 GHz | 2.30 GHz |

| boostClock | 3.20 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| tdp | 80 W | 15 W |

| socket | Intel BGA 2579 | AMD Socket FP6 |

| architecture | Ice Lake | Zen 3 |

| codename | Ice Lake-D | Barcelo-R |

| generation | Xeon D (Ice Lake-D) | Ryzen 3 (Zen 3 (Cezanne)) |

| processNode | 10 nm | 7 nm |

| foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| transistors | Not specified | 10,700 million |

| dieSize | Not specified | 180 mm² |

| l1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| l2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| l3 cache | 15 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| memoryBus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| memoryBandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| pcie | Gen 4, 32 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| integratedGraphics | None | Radeon Graphics (Vega 4) |

| marketSegment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| releaseDate | 2022-02-23 | 2023-01-03 |

| partNumber | SRLCJ | 100-000000944 |

Both processors share DDR4 memory support, ECC capability, active production status, and a locked multiplier. Neither has a launch MSRP listed in the data.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon D-2733NT wins decisively in multi-threaded server-style workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13775 is more than double the Ryzen’s 6230, a 121.1% lead. The 8-core/16-thread configuration, 15 MB L3 cache, and 85.3 GB/s quad-channel memory bandwidth make it suited for virtualization, database serving, and content rendering where parallel throughput is paramount. The 80W TDP and server/workstation market segment reinforce this positioning, as does the Gen 4 PCIe with 32 lanes for high-bandwidth peripherals.

The AMD Ryzen 3 7330U wins on efficiency and single-thread capability, though the latter is inferred rather than directly benchmarked. Its 15W TDP is one-fifth of the Xeon’s, making it ideal for battery-powered mobile systems. The 4.30 GHz boost clock is 1.1 GHz higher than the Intel part, which typically translates to faster response in lightly threaded applications. The 7 nm TSMC process and smaller die (180 mm² versus unspecified) indicate a more power-efficient design. Integrated Radeon Graphics (Vega 4) provide display output without a discrete GPU, which the Xeon cannot offer. The dual-channel memory and Gen 3 PCIe are adequate for mainstream mobile workloads.

In terms of nearest rivals, the two chips sit in similar company. The Xeon D-2733NT’s closest competitor is the Intel Xeon E-2336 with an average score of 3985 (0% delta), followed by the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G at 3977 (0.2% delta). The Ryzen 3 7330U’s nearest rival is the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 at 3959 (0% delta), with the Intel Core i7-6900K at 3970 (-0.3% delta). Both processors effectively trade blows with mid-range desktop and older workstation parts.

The use-case split is clear: choose the Xeon D-2733NT for rack-mounted servers, multi-threaded enterprise applications, or any workload that demands maximum core count and memory bandwidth. Choose the Ryzen 3 7330U for thin-and-light laptops, embedded systems, or any scenario prioritizing power consumption and portability over raw multi-core performance. The data shows two competent processors that serve different masters, with the Intel part dominating in throughput and the AMD part offering a more balanced, energy-conscious package.