AMD Ryzen 3 7330U vs AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS Comparison

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS in multi-core rendering?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen 9 5980HS scores 12,629, while the Ryzen 3 7330U scores 6,230. That is a 102.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9, meaning it delivers over double the multi-threaded performance.

Q: Do both processors use the same manufacturing process?

A: Yes. Both the Ryzen 9 5980HS and the Ryzen 3 7330U are built on TSMC's 7 nm process node. Both chips also share the same die size of 180 mm² and transistor count of 10,700 million.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Ryzen 9 5980HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Ryzen 3 7330U has half as many, with 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: The Ryzen 3 7330U supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen 9 5980HS does not. This is a notable distinction for users who require error-correcting memory in their systems.

Q: How does the average benchmark score compare between the two?

A: The Ryzen 9 5980HS has an average benchmark score of 4,121, while the Ryzen 3 7330U sits close behind at 3,958. Despite the large multi-core gap, their overall average scores are separated by only about 4%.

Q: Do they share the same socket?

A: Yes, both processors use AMD Socket FP6. This means they are physically compatible with the same motherboard socket type, though other platform considerations may apply.

Architecture Differences

The Ryzen 9 5980HS and the Ryzen 3 7330U are both built on the Zen 3 architecture, specifically the Cezanne silicon. The Ryzen 9 is part of the 5000 series and carries the codename Cezanne, while the Ryzen 3 belongs to the 7000 series and uses the Barcelo-R codename. Despite the generational naming difference, the underlying architecture remains Zen 3 for both.

The most significant architectural split is in core configuration. The Ryzen 9 5980HS features 8 cores and 16 threads, whereas the Ryzen 3 7330U is cut down to 4 cores and 8 threads. This directly explains the massive multi-threaded performance gap.

Cache allocation also differs. Both chips have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. The shared L3 cache, however, is halved on the Ryzen 3: the 5980HS has 16 MB shared, while the 7330U has only 8 MB shared. This reduction in L3 capacity can impact workloads that rely on large working sets.

Clock speeds favor the Ryzen 9 as well. The base clock on the 5980HS is 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The 7330U starts lower at 2.30 GHz and boosts to 4.30 GHz. The thermal design power (TDP) reflects the performance positioning: the Ryzen 9 is rated at 35 W, while the Ryzen 3 is a more power-efficient 15 W part.

Both chips use the same 7 nm TSMC process, have identical transistor counts of 10,700 million, and share a die size of 180 mm². Both also support DDR4 memory through a dual-channel interface, and both provide PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Ryzen 9 has a memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s, while the Ryzen 3 is lower at 51.2 GB/s.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The 5980HS includes Radeon Vega 8, while the 7330U features Radeon Graphics with Vega 4. The Ryzen 3 compensates with ECC memory support, a feature absent on the Ryzen 9.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head data contains one direct comparison: Cinebench R23 multi-core. This is a decisive win for the Ryzen 9 5980HS.

The Ryzen 9 scores 12,629 points, while the Ryzen 3 7330U manages 6,230 points. The delta is 102.7%, meaning the 5980HS is more than twice as fast in this multi-threaded rendering test. This result aligns with the core count advantage: 8 cores and 16 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads. The higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz versus 4.30 GHz also contributes to the margin.

When looking at the broader benchmark picture, the two CPUs land at the same overall percentile. Both sit at the 57th percentile when compared against all CPUs in the database. The average benchmark scores are close as well: 4,121 for the 5980HS and 3,958 for the 7330U. This suggests that in mixed workloads, the Ryzen 9's lead narrows considerably, even though it dominates in heavily threaded tasks.

The Ryzen 9's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X with an average score of 4,114 (0.2% behind), the Intel Core i5-12500TE at 4,083 (0.9% behind), and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X at 4,073 (1.2% behind). It also trails the Intel Core i9-9900 by 1%, which scores 4,163. The Ryzen 3's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 at 3,959 (0% difference), the Intel Core i7-6900K at 3,970 (0.3% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U at 3,971 (0.3% ahead).

The data shows that despite the enormous multi-core gap, the overall average scores place both chips in a similar performance tier when considering diverse workloads.

The Verdict

The data tells a clear story: the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS is the superior processor for multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,629 versus 6,230 for the Ryzen 3 7330U represents a 102.7% lead, making it the obvious choice for rendering, compilation, and other parallel workloads.

However, the Ryzen 3 7330U is not without merit. It matches the Ryzen 9 in overall percentile ranking at 57%, and its average benchmark score of 3,958 is within 4% of the Ryzen 9's 4,121. For lighter tasks, the Ryzen 3's lower 15 W TDP makes it a more power-efficient option compared to the 35 W Ryzen 9.

The Ryzen 3 also offers ECC memory support, which the Ryzen 9 lacks. This makes the 7330U attractive for specific reliability-focused use cases where memory errors are unacceptable.

For users who prioritize raw compute throughput, the Ryzen 9 5980HS is the clear pick. For users who value efficiency, lower power draw, and ECC support, the Ryzen 3 7330U holds its own in a different segment.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | AMD Ryzen 3 7330U |

|---|---|---|

| Series | 5000 series | 7000 series |

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 2.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 15 W |

| Codename | Cezanne | Barcelo-R |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 | Radeon Graphics (Vega 4) |

| Release Date | 2021-01-11 | 2023-01-03 |

| Part Number | 100-000000474 | 100-000000944 |

Both CPUs share the same socket (AMD Socket FP6), architecture (Zen 3), process node (7 nm TSMC), foundry (TSMC), transistor count (10,700 million), die size (180 mm²), L1 cache (64 KB per core), L2 cache (512 KB per core), memory type (DDR4), memory bus (dual-channel), PCIe version (Gen 3, 16 lanes), market segment (mobile), and production status (active). Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS wins in:

• Multi-threaded rendering: 102.7% ahead in Cinebench R23 multi-core.
• Core and thread count: 8 cores / 16 threads versus 4 cores / 8 threads.
• Clock speeds: higher base (3.00 GHz) and boost (4.80 GHz) clocks.
• Cache capacity: 16 MB shared L3 versus 8 MB.
• Memory bandwidth: 68.3 GB/s versus 51.2 GB/s.
• Integrated graphics: Radeon Vega 8 versus Vega 4.

AMD Ryzen 3 7330U wins in:

• Power efficiency: 15 W TDP versus 35 W.
• ECC memory support: available on the 7330U, absent on the 5980HS.
• Overall average score proximity: despite the multi-core deficit, its average benchmark score of 3,958 is within 4% of the Ryzen 9's 4,121.

The Ryzen 9 5980HS is the choice for demanding parallel workloads, heavy productivity, and any task that scales with cores and threads. The Ryzen 3 7330U is better suited for power-constrained systems, reliability-focused builds requiring ECC, and users who need only moderate multi-core performance with lower heat output.