AMD Ryzen 3 5425U vs Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains only two directly comparable benchmark results between these processors, and both favor the Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Xeon scores 10,601 against the Ryzen 3 5425U's 5,954.5, a delta of 43.8% in Intel's favor. That is a decisive margin for heavily threaded workloads, and it aligns with the Xeon's larger core and thread count.

Single-core performance tells a closer story. The Xeon E5-2618L v3 posts 1,496 in Cinebench R23 single-core, while the Ryzen 3 5425U manages 1,332. The Intel part leads by 11%, which is notable given the Ryzen's much higher boost clock. The Ryzen's 4.10 GHz boost versus the Xeon's 3.40 GHz should theoretically favor AMD in lightly threaded tasks, but the benchmark data shows otherwise. The Xeon's older Haswell architecture still delivers a single-core advantage in this specific test.

Looking at the broader benchmark averages, the two CPUs sit almost identically. The Ryzen 3 5425U has an average benchmark score of 3,124, while the Xeon E5-2618L v3 averages 3,066. That is a difference of roughly 1.9%, well within run-to-run variance. Both processors occupy the 52nd percentile against all CPUs in the database, meaning they land in the same performance tier overall despite their very different designs.

The nearest rivals for each chip reinforce this parity. The Ryzen 3 5425U sits within 0.9% of the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U, and within 0.4% of the Intel Core i3-13100TE. The Xeon E5-2618L v3 is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 4980U at a 0% delta, and within 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-6850K. Neither chip dramatically outperforms its closest competitors, which suggests the head-to-head result is more about workload suitability than raw capability.

Architecture Differences

The fundamental gap between these two processors is generational and architectural. The AMD Ryzen 3 5425U is built on Zen 3, codenamed Barcelo, using a 7 nm process from TSMC. It packs 10,700 million transistors into a 180 mm² die. The Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 uses the Haswell-EP architecture on Intel's 22 nm process, with 2,600 million transistors on a 356 mm² die. The process node difference is stark: 7 nm versus 22 nm, which explains the Ryzen's far higher transistor density despite its smaller physical size.

Core and thread counts diverge significantly. The Ryzen 3 5425U offers 4 cores and 8 threads. The Xeon E5-2618L v3 doubles that to 8 cores and 16 threads. This directly explains the multi-core benchmark gap. Cache configurations also differ. Both share 64 KB of L1 per core, but the Ryzen has 512 KB of L2 per core versus the Xeon's 256 KB per core. The Xeon counters with a much larger L3 pool: 20 MB shared versus the Ryzen's 8 MB shared.

Memory subsystems take different paths as well. Both support DDR4, and both allow ECC memory. The Ryzen 3 5425U runs dual-channel with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Xeon E5-2618L v3 uses a quad-channel bus, rated at 59.7 GB/s. That higher bandwidth serves the Xeon's server-oriented role. PCIe connectivity also favors the Xeon: 40 Gen 3 lanes from the CPU versus 16 Gen 3 lanes on the Ryzen.

The integrated graphics situation is one-sided. The Ryzen 3 5425U includes Radeon Vega 6 graphics, while the Xeon E5-2618L v3 has no integrated graphics at all. That makes the Ryzen a self-contained mobile solution, while the Xeon requires a discrete GPU for any display output. Power envelopes reflect their intended markets: the Ryzen is a 15 W mobile part, the Xeon is a 75 W server/workstation chip.

The release dates are separated by more than seven years. The Xeon launched in September 2014, while the Ryzen arrived in January 2022. Both are still listed as active production parts, which is unusual for a processor as old as the Xeon.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core benchmark score?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 scores 10,601 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 43.8% higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 5425U's 5,954.5.

Q: Does the Ryzen 3 5425U win any benchmark in the head-to-head data?

A: No. The only two directly comparable tests, Cinebench R23 multi-core and single-core, both list the Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 as the winner.

Q: How do their overall average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Ryzen 3 5425U averages 3,124 across all benchmarks, while the Xeon E5-2618L v3 averages 3,066. The difference is approximately 1.9%.

Q: Can the Ryzen 3 5425U output video without a discrete GPU?

A: Yes. It includes Radeon Vega 6 integrated graphics. The Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 has no integrated graphics and requires a separate GPU for display.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Both support ECC memory. They also both use DDR4, though the Xeon uses a quad-channel configuration and the Ryzen uses dual-channel.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3?

A: The launch MSRP is $779. The AMD Ryzen 3 5425U has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Ryzen 3 5425U and the Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3:

• Cores: 4 (AMD) versus 8 (Intel)
• Threads: 8 (AMD) versus 16 (Intel)
• Base clock: 2.70 GHz (AMD) versus 2.30 GHz (Intel)
• Boost clock: 4.10 GHz (AMD) versus 3.40 GHz (Intel)
• TDP: 15 W (AMD) versus 75 W (Intel)
• Socket: AMD Socket FP6 (AMD) versus Intel Socket 2011-3 (Intel)
• Architecture: Zen 3 (AMD) versus Haswell (Intel)
• Codename: Barcelo (AMD) versus Haswell-EP (Intel)
• Process node: 7 nm (AMD) versus 22 nm (Intel)
• Foundry: TSMC (AMD) versus Intel (Intel)
• Transistors: 10,700 million (AMD) versus 2,600 million (Intel)
• Die size: 180 mm² (AMD) versus 356 mm² (Intel)
• L2 cache per core: 512 KB (AMD) versus 256 KB (Intel)
• L3 cache: 8 MB shared (AMD) versus 20 MB shared (Intel)
• Memory bus: Dual-channel (AMD) versus Quad-channel (Intel)
• Memory bandwidth: 51.2 GB/s (AMD) versus 59.7 GB/s (Intel)
• PCIe lanes: 16 Gen 3 (AMD) versus 40 Gen 3 (Intel)
• Integrated graphics: Radeon Vega 6 (AMD) versus none (Intel)
• Market segment: Mobile (AMD) versus Server/Workstation (Intel)
• Release date: 2022-01-05 (AMD) versus 2014-09-07 (Intel)
• Launch MSRP: none recorded (AMD) versus $779 (Intel)
• Part number: 100-000000586 (AMD) versus SR200 (Intel)

Fields that are identical include L1 cache at 64 KB per core, DDR4 memory support, ECC support, locked multipliers, and active production status. Both parts also share the 52nd percentile ranking against all CPUs.

The Verdict

The data points to two very different tools for two very different jobs. The Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 wins both recorded head-to-head benchmarks, and its multi-core lead is substantial. If the workload is heavily threaded and can use 16 threads, the Xeon is the clear choice. Its 43.8% advantage in Cinebench R23 multi-core is not a marginal win; it is a category difference.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5425U should not be dismissed, however. Its average benchmark score is slightly higher overall, and it does so at a fraction of the power draw. The 15 W TDP versus 75 W TDP is a massive efficiency gap. For mobile use, battery-powered systems, or any scenario where heat and power are constrained, the Ryzen is the sensible pick. It also includes integrated graphics, which the Xeon lacks entirely.

The Xeon's single-core win of 11% in Cinebench R23 is worth noting. Even in lightly threaded tasks, the older Intel architecture holds an edge over the newer AMD part. That is surprising on paper, given the Ryzen's higher boost clock, but the recorded scores do not lie. For users who need maximum per-thread performance, the Xeon still delivers.

Both CPUs sit at the 52nd percentile, and their average scores are within 2%. That means for mixed or general-purpose workloads, the choice comes down to platform fit rather than raw capability. The Xeon requires a Socket 2011-3 motherboard, a discrete GPU, and a much larger power delivery system. The Ryzen fits into a mobile platform with everything built in.

Where Each One Wins

Choose the Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 for: multi-threaded rendering, server workloads, virtualized environments, or any task that scales across 16 threads. Its 10,601 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 59.7 GB/s quad-channel memory bandwidth make it the stronger compute engine. The 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes also support more expansion cards and storage devices. The single-core win of 11% means it also handles lightly threaded tasks well, despite its age.

Choose the AMD Ryzen 3 5425U for: mobile systems, low-power builds, or any situation where the 15 W TDP matters. It delivers comparable average performance to the Xeon while using a fraction of the power. The integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics remove the need for a separate GPU. Its newer 7 nm process and higher boost clock of 4.10 GHz make it a more modern and efficient package. The 51.2 GB/s dual-channel bandwidth is sufficient for most consumer workloads, and the smaller 180 mm² die reflects a much more compact design.

Neither chip is a universal winner. The Xeon dominates in raw throughput and memory bandwidth, but it demands a server-class platform. The Ryzen offers efficiency and integration, but it lacks the core count for heavy parallel workloads. If the database shows one clear takeaway, it is this: benchmark scores alone do not tell the whole story, and the right choice depends entirely on the platform and power budget available.