AMD Ryzen 3 5400U vs Intel Xeon D-1567 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear, if narrow, picture: the Intel Xeon D-1567 wins every single head-to-head comparison in the Cinebench suite, yet the margins are consistently small. Across six tests, the Intel part takes all six victories, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5400U records zero wins. The largest gap appears in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the Xeon D-1567 leads by 3.0%. Every other test shows a delta of 2.3% or 2.4%, which is a remarkably consistent margin given the architectural differences between the two processors.

Looking at multi-core results, the Xeon D-1567 scores 965 in Cinebench R15, 4022 in R20, and 9578 in R23. The Ryzen 3 5400U trails with 942, 3927, and 9350 respectively. Each of these multi-core deltas sits at 2.4%, suggesting the performance relationship between the two chips does not change as the workload scales from older to newer Cinebench versions. The single-core results follow a similar pattern: 136 vs 132 in R15 (3.0%), 567 vs 554 in R20 (2.3%), and 1352 vs 1320 in R23 (2.4%).

What is notable is how close these scores are despite the vastly different core counts. The Xeon D-1567 packs 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Ryzen 3 5400U has only 4 cores and 8 threads. Yet the multi-core advantage for Intel is just 2.4%. This indicates that the AMD chip's per-core efficiency, driven by its higher clock speeds and newer architecture, nearly compensates for having one-third the core count. The Ryzen 3 5400U boosts to 4.00 GHz compared to the Xeon's 2.70 GHz, and that frequency advantage shows up clearly in the closeness of the results.

Average benchmark scores reinforce this parity. The Xeon D-1567 has an average benchmark score of 2770, while the Ryzen 3 5400U sits at 2765. The nearest rival list for each confirms they are direct competitors: the Xeon's rivals include the Ryzen 3 5400U with a deltaPct of 0.2%, and the Ryzen's rivals include the Xeon with a deltaPct of -0.2%. For context, the Xeon's other nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE (2767, +0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G (2774, -0.2%), and the Intel Core i7-5930K (2775, -0.2%). The Ryzen 3 5400U's other rivals include the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE (2759, +0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G (2774, -0.3%).

The percentile rankings are nearly identical as well. The Xeon D-1567 lands at the 51st percentile among all CPUs, while the Ryzen 3 5400U sits at the 50th percentile. This one-percentage-point difference in percentile ranking directly mirrors the 0.2% average score delta, making it clear that these two processors occupy essentially the same performance tier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the most head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1567 wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests. The AMD Ryzen 3 5400U wins none. The Intel advantage ranges from 2.3% to 3.0% depending on the specific test.

Q: How close are their average benchmark scores?

A: The Xeon D-1567 has an average benchmark score of 2770, while the Ryzen 3 5400U scores 2765. This is a difference of just 5 points, or 0.2%. Each chip lists the other as a nearest rival with that exact deltaPct.

Q: Does the Ryzen 3 5400U have any benchmark not present on the Xeon D-1567?

A: Yes. The Ryzen 3 5400U includes Geekbench results: 4473 in multi-core and 1419 in single-core. The Xeon D-1567's benchmark list does not include any Geekbench scores.

Q: What is the core and thread difference between these two CPUs?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1567 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 5400U has 4 cores and 8 threads. Despite having three times the core count, the Xeon's multi-core lead is only 2.4% in Cinebench R23.

Q: How do their percentile rankings compare?

A: The Xeon D-1567 ranks at the 51st percentile among all CPUs, while the Ryzen 3 5400U ranks at the 50th percentile. This is a one-percentile difference that aligns with their near-identical average scores.

Q: Which chip has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5400U boosts to 4.00 GHz, compared to the Intel Xeon D-1567's 2.70 GHz. The base clocks are 2.60 GHz for AMD and 2.10 GHz for Intel.

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward conclusion: the Intel Xeon D-1567 is the faster processor in every benchmark where both were tested, but the margin is razor-thin. With a 2.4% lead in multi-core Cinebench R23 and a 3.0% lead in single-core Cinebench R15, the Xeon is technically superior across the board. However, the practical significance of a 2.4% performance difference is minimal for most workloads, and the Ryzen 3 5400U's much lower power envelope may offset that advantage in mobile scenarios.

The Ryzen 3 5400U, despite having only 4 cores and 8 threads, comes within striking distance of a 12-core, 24-thread Xeon part. This is a remarkable result for AMD's Zen 3 architecture and its 4.00 GHz boost clock. For tasks that depend heavily on single-threaded performance, the Ryzen's 2.3-3.0% deficit is unlikely to be perceptible. For multi-threaded workloads, the Xeon's 12 cores provide a real but modest edge.

The percentile rankings reinforce the verdict of near-parity: 51st percentile for Intel versus 50th for AMD. The average benchmark scores differ by only 0.2%. The Xeon D-1567 is the winner on paper, but the Ryzen 3 5400U is a far more efficient design, consuming 15W TDP versus the Xeon's 65W. For a server or workstation where raw multi-core throughput is the priority, the Xeon's consistent wins make it the logical pick. For a mobile or power-constrained environment, the Ryzen's competitive scores at a fraction of the power draw are compelling.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge sharply on core configuration. The Intel Xeon D-1567 offers 12 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5400U provides 4 cores and 8 threads. Clock speeds favor AMD: the Ryzen runs at 2.60 GHz base and 4.00 GHz boost, whereas the Xeon runs at 2.10 GHz base and 2.70 GHz boost. Thermal design power tells a dramatic story, with the Xeon rated at 65W and the Ryzen at just 15W.

Socket compatibility is entirely different. The Xeon D-1567 uses Intel BGA 1667, while the Ryzen 3 5400U uses AMD Socket FP6. Memory support overlaps on DDR4, but the Xeon also supports DDR3, while the Ryzen supports only DDR4. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The Ryzen 3 5400U has a specified memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the Xeon's memory bandwidth is not listed. ECC memory is supported on the Xeon but not on the Ryzen.

PCIe capabilities differ: the Xeon provides Gen 3 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen offers Gen 3 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The Ryzen includes integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics, whereas the Xeon has no integrated graphics listed. The Xeon's launch MSRP is 1199, and it targets the server/workstation market segment; the Ryzen targets mobile and has no launch MSRP listed. Release dates are far apart, with the Xeon launching on 2016-02-23 and the Ryzen on 2021-01-11.

Architecture Differences

The manufacturing processes are generations apart. The Intel Xeon D-1567 is built on a 14 nm process at Intel's foundry, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5400U uses a 7 nm process at TSMC. The Xeon's die contains 3,200 million transistors on a 246 mm² die, while the Ryzen packs 10,700 million transistors on a smaller 180 mm² die. This transistor density advantage explains how the Ryzen achieves competitive performance with far fewer cores.

The microarchitectures reflect different design philosophies. The Xeon D-1567 uses Intel's Broadwell architecture, specifically the Broadwell-DE generation aimed at Xeon D processors. The Ryzen 3 5400U uses AMD's Zen 3 architecture under the Cezanne-U codename, part of the 5000 series. Zen 3 is roughly five years newer than Broadwell, which accounts for the per-core efficiency gains.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache configuration is where they diverge: the Xeon provides 1.5 MB per core, while the Ryzen offers 8 MB shared across all cores. The shared L3 on the Ryzen is a more flexible arrangement for its 4-core design, while the Xeon's per-core allocation scales with its 12 cores. Neither chip lists a total L3 cache figure, and neither features 3D V-Cache.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon D-1567 wins every benchmark where both processors were tested, making it the clear choice for workloads that prioritize raw Cinebench scores. Its 12-core, 24-thread configuration gives it a structural advantage in heavily multi-threaded tasks like video rendering, 3D modeling, or server-side batch processing. The Xeon's ECC memory support and 24 PCIe lanes also position it for server and workstation environments where data integrity and expansion capability matter. Its server/workstation market segment designation reinforces this use case.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5400U, despite losing all six head-to-head tests, wins in contexts that the benchmark numbers alone do not capture. Its 15W TDP makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops and other power-sensitive mobile devices, whereas the Xeon's 65W TDP is a server-class power draw. The Ryzen's 4.00 GHz boost clock brings single-threaded performance within 2.3-3.0% of the Xeon, which means everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications will feel nearly identical. The integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics also eliminates the need for a discrete GPU in basic display tasks, something the Xeon cannot offer with no integrated graphics listed.

For users choosing between these two, the decision hinges on environment rather than benchmark supremacy. The Xeon D-1567 is the winner for always-plugged-in server racks, workstations, or any deployment where the 65W TDP is acceptable and multi-core throughput is paramount. The Ryzen 3 5400U is the winner for mobile computing, fanless or low-noise designs, or any scenario where the 15W TDP and integrated graphics provide system-level advantages that outweigh a 2.4% multi-core deficit. The benchmark data shows near-parity in performance; the specification data shows a chasm in power efficiency and platform focus.