AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no recorded test scores for the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE. Every measurement in this comparison comes from the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, which has a complete set of 17 benchmark entries. As a result, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided: the Intel part posts scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Passmark suites, while the AMD processor has no data available for any of those tests.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and a single-core score of 6,909. In Cinebench R20, it records 20,556 multi-core and 2,901 single-core. The R15 runs show 4,933 multi-core and 696 single-core. These figures place the Intel processor at the 95th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 75,488.

The Passmark results for the Intel part are extensive. Data compression scores 602,121, data encryption scores 46,949, and extended instructions score 45,357. Floating point math reaches 194,988, integer math hits 164,869, and multithread performance records 56,602. Physics tests produce 3,598, random string sorting yields 73,651, and find prime numbers completes at 459. Single-thread Passmark results are recorded twice, at 4,881 in both entries.

Since the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has zero benchmark entries and an average score of 0, the win count stands at 0 for AMD and 17 for Intel across the recorded tests. The percentile ranking tells the same story: the AMD chip sits at the 50th percentile versus the Intel chip at the 95th percentile. The database shows no head-to-head benchmark pairs, no nearest rivals for the AMD part, and no delta percentages for either side of this comparison.

The absence of AMD data means no direct percentage deltas can be computed. What the database does show is that the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 sits within a narrow band of comparable processors. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 8224P with an average score of 75,582 (delta -0.1%), the AMD EPYC 4545P at 75,373 (delta +0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D at 75,716 (delta -0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 at 75,738 (delta -0.3%). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating the Intel part performs essentially on par with those server and workstation-class chips in aggregate benchmark scores.

The Verdict

The data presents an unambiguous picture. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a fully measured processor with 17 benchmark scores, a 95th percentile ranking, and an average score of 75,488. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has no recorded benchmarks, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking. From the database alone, there is no evidence of competitive performance from the AMD part.

For users selecting on measured performance, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 delivers. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 reflects substantial parallel workload capability, and its single-core score of 6,909 indicates strong light-thread performance. The Passmark multithread score of 56,602 and the 602,121 data compression result reinforce this pattern across different workload types.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE, by contrast, offers no measurable data to compare. Its 50th percentile ranking is based on the absence of test results rather than demonstrated performance. The database cannot confirm any workload advantage for this part, nor can it place it relative to the Intel chip or any other rival.

The Intel processor also shows proximity to high-end rivals. Its average score of 75,488 is within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, and within 0.2% of the AMD EPYC 4545P. This places it in server-class territory for aggregate performance, despite being a desktop part.

The AMD processor has no nearest rivals listed, which further limits any contextual analysis. There is no data to suggest which category of CPUs it competes with, nor any delta percentages to quantify gaps. The 50th percentile ranking implies median placement, but without benchmark scores, that ranking carries no evidentiary weight.

From the recorded data, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is the only part in this comparison with demonstrated capability. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE remains an unmeasured entry in the database. Any purchasing decision based strictly on these measurements would favor the Intel processor.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75,488. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmark entries.

Q: How do the Cinebench scores compare between the two CPUs?

A: Only the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has Cinebench scores. It records 48,945 in R23 multi-core, 6,909 in R23 single-core, 20,556 in R20 multi-core, 2,901 in R20 single-core, 4,933 in R15 multi-core, and 696 in R15 single-core. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has no Cinebench data.

Q: What percentile ranking does each CPU hold in the database?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 ranks at the 95th percentile among all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE ranks at the 50th percentile.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is $579. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has no launch MSRP recorded.

Q: Which processors are closest in performance to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285?

A: The nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 8224P (average score 75,582, delta -0.1%), the AMD EPYC 4545P (75,373, delta +0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (75,716, delta -0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (75,738, delta -0.3%).

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has an empty benchmarks list with zero recorded test scores.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE uses 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses 24 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks are 3.60 GHz for AMD and 2.50 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 4.20 GHz for AMD and 5.60 GHz for Intel. Thermal design power is 35 W for AMD and 65 W for Intel.

The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1851. Memory support differs: DDR4 for AMD, DDR5 for Intel. Memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s for AMD and 102.4 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory support is false for AMD and true for Intel. PCIe capability is Gen 3 with 16 lanes for AMD, versus Gen 5 with 20 lanes for Intel.

Integrated graphics differ: Radeon Vega 6 for AMD, Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU for Intel. The multiplier is unlocked on the AMD part and locked on the Intel part. Part numbers are 100-000001805 for AMD and SRQD4 for Intel. Release dates are 2025-02-23 for AMD and 2024-12-31 for Intel. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $579; the AMD part has none.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE uses the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename, part of the 5000 series. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-S codename, part of the Core Ultra Series 2. Process nodes are 7 nm for AMD and 3 nm for Intel, both fabricated by TSMC. Transistor counts are 10,700 million for AMD and 17,800 million for Intel. Die sizes are 180 mm² for AMD and 243 mm² for Intel.

Cache hierarchies diverge substantially. The AMD part has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB L3. The Intel part has 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The AMD cache configuration is per-core for L1 and L2 with a single L3 pool, while the Intel L3 is explicitly shared across all cores.

Generation labels reflect the architectural split: the AMD part is listed as Ryzen 3 (Zen 3, Cezanne), while the Intel part is listed as Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake). Both processors are desktop market segments with active production status. The Intel part enables ECC memory support, which the AMD part does not. The AMD memory bus is dual-channel DDR4, and the Intel memory bus is dual-channel DDR5, each with respective bandwidth figures already noted.

The foundry is the same for both parts (TSMC), but the process node difference indicates a generational leap in manufacturing technology for the Intel chip. The Intel processor also carries a notably larger L3 cache and higher per-core L2 allocation, which aligns with its higher core count and thread count. The AMD part offers a lower TDP of 35 W versus 65 W for Intel, and the AMD multiplier is unlocked for overclocking while the Intel multiplier is locked.