AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE vs Intel Core 3 304 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE and Intel Core 3 304 serve fundamentally different markets, which is immediately clear from their specifications and benchmark data. The Ryzen 3 5305GE is a desktop part built on the mature Zen 3 architecture, while the Core 3 304 is a mobile processor using Intel’s newer 3 nm process. The benchmark results recorded for the Core 3 304 show a clear performance advantage in most measured tasks, but the Ryzen 3 5305GE has structural advantages in core count and memory bandwidth that matter for specific workloads. The data indicates that the Core 3 304 is the stronger all-around performer, while the Ryzen 3 5305GE offers a different set of trade-offs.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 304 wins decisively in multi-threaded and single-threaded compute benchmarks. In Cinebench R23, the Core 3 304 scores 5263 in multi-core and 1765 in single-core, which are the highest recorded scores in its benchmark suite. The PassMark multithread score of 11625 and single-thread score of 3614 further confirm that this processor is designed for sustained computational throughput. Its boost clock of 4.30 GHz, combined with a 3 nm process, allows it to deliver high performance within a 15 W TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light mobile systems where performance per watt is critical.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which limits direct comparisons. However, its specifications point to areas where it would likely excel. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, compared to the Core 3 304’s 5 cores and 5 threads. This means the Ryzen 3 5305GE can handle twice as many threads simultaneously, which is beneficial for workloads that scale with thread count, such as video encoding or software compilation. Additionally, its dual-channel DDR4 memory support provides 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth, whereas the Core 3 304 is limited to single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s. While the Intel part has higher raw bandwidth, the AMD part’s dual-channel design can reduce latency in memory-sensitive tasks.

The Core 3 304 also wins in data compression and encryption tasks. Its PassMark data compression score is 114775 and data encryption score is 8501, indicating strong performance in these specific operations. The Ryzen 3 5305GE, with its Zen 3 architecture and 8 MB of L3 cache, may offer better performance in workloads that benefit from larger cache sizes, but without recorded benchmarks, this remains speculative.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on entirely different architectures and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE uses the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne, on a 7 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The processor uses the AMD Socket AM4 and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It has 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU and features Radeon Vega 6 integrated graphics. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking.

The Intel Core 3 304 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, built on a 3 nm process node by Intel. It has 5 cores and 5 threads, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The cache configuration consists of 192 KB of L1, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a single-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The processor uses the Intel BGA 1516 socket and has 6 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Its integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. The multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking.

The transistor count and die size are recorded for the AMD part: 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The Intel part does not have these figures in the database. The process node difference is significant: 7 nm versus 3 nm, which typically translates to higher transistor density and better power efficiency for the Intel part. The Core 3 304’s TDP of 15 W is less than half of the Ryzen 3 5305GE’s 35 W, despite the Intel part having more cores and a higher boost clock.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE and the Intel Core 3 304. The Intel part has a full suite of recorded scores, while the AMD part has none. This means the comparison must rely on the Intel part’s absolute scores and its position relative to other CPUs.

The Core 3 304’s average benchmark score is 13745, placing it at the 68th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX with an average score of 13786 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core i7-8750H with 13868 (0.9% higher), the Intel Core 5 120UL with 13594 (1.1% lower), and the AMD EPYC 7443 with 13936 (1.4% higher). These deltas show that the Core 3 304 is competitive with high-end desktop and server processors from several generations ago, despite being a low-power mobile chip.

In Cinebench R20, the Core 3 304 scores 4160 in multi-core and 587 in single-core. The R15 scores are 849 for multi-core and 264 for single-core. These results show consistent scaling across different Cinebench versions. The PassMark suite reveals strengths in floating-point math (29722), integer math (24640), and extended instructions (9686), while the find prime numbers score is notably low at 68. This suggests the Core 3 304 performs best in general-purpose computing tasks that do not rely on prime number generation.

Without recorded benchmarks for the Ryzen 3 5305GE, the data cannot confirm whether it would outperform the Core 3 304 in any specific test. The Ryzen 3 5305GE’s 8 threads give it a theoretical advantage in highly parallel workloads, but the Core 3 304’s higher boost clock and newer process node may offset this in tasks that are limited by single-thread performance.

The Verdict

The Intel Core 3 304 is the clear performance leader based on the recorded data. Its benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark are substantial, and its 68th percentile ranking places it above the majority of CPUs in the database. The processor delivers this performance within a 15 W TDP, making it an exceptional choice for mobile systems that require both power efficiency and computational capability. Its launch MSRP is $309.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE, with no recorded benchmarks, cannot be recommended on the basis of measured performance. Its specifications suggest it would be competitive in multi-threaded workloads thanks to its 8 threads, and its dual-channel memory support is a technical advantage. However, its 35 W TDP and older 7 nm process indicate it would consume more power for similar performance levels. The Ryzen 3 5305GE is better suited for desktop systems where power efficiency is less critical and where the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking.

For users prioritizing raw performance in a mobile form factor, the Core 3 304 is the superior choice. For users building a desktop system that values thread count and memory bandwidth, the Ryzen 3 5305GE has structural merits, but the lack of benchmark data prevents a definitive verdict.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 boosts to 4.30 GHz, which is 0.10 GHz higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE’s 4.20 GHz boost.

Q: How do their memory bandwidths compare?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 has a single-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has a lower TDP?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 has a TDP of 15 W, which is 20 W lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE’s 35 W.

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core 3 304?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 has an average benchmark score of 13745, placing it at the 68th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE have an unlocked multiplier?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel Core 3 304 is locked.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE | Intel Core 3 304 |

|----------------|---------------------|-------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 5 |

| Threads | 8 | 5 |

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.20 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2025-02-23 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $309 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Part Number | 100-000001805 | SAE3K |