AMD Ryzen 3 5300U vs Intel Xeon E-2224G Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U and Intel Xeon E-2224G are both quad-core processors, but they target entirely different market segments: the former is a 15W mobile part built for thin-and-light laptops, while the latter is a 71W server/workstation chip designed for entry-level servers. Despite their shared core count, benchmark results show a split decision, with the AMD chip winning in Cinebench R15 and R23 single-core tests, while the Intel part takes Cinebench R23 multi-core and Geekbench victories. The data reveals that architectural choices and power envelopes matter more than raw core counts.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U has an average benchmark score of 2135, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G scores 2117. The difference is less than 1%, putting both processors at the 46th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How do the two chips compare in single-core Cinebench R23 performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U scores 1115 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is 23.5% ahead of the Intel Xeon E-2224G's score of 903.

Q: Which processor is better for multi-threaded workloads in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2224G leads with a score of 6398, which is 16.5% higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U's 5341. This is notable because the AMD chip has 8 threads versus the Intel's 4 threads.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U has a TDP of 15 watts, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G has a TDP of 71 watts. This represents a significant difference in thermal design power.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Xeon E-2224G supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U does not.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2224G has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U's 3.80 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures from different generations. The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U uses the Zen 2 microarchitecture, codenamed Lucienne, and is manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. In contrast, the Intel Xeon E-2224G uses the Coffee Lake architecture, specifically Coffee Lake-S WS, and is built on Intel's 14 nm process. This process node difference is substantial, with the AMD part using a significantly more advanced fabrication technology.

The transistor counts reflect this architectural gap. The AMD chip integrates 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die, while the Intel Xeon's transistor count is not specified in the data, though its die size is smaller at 126 mm². The AMD processor also features a larger L2 cache at 512 KB per core versus the Intel's 256 KB per core. However, the Intel part has a larger shared L3 cache at 8 MB, compared to the AMD's 4 MB shared L3.

Threading capabilities differ significantly. The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U supports simultaneous multithreading, offering 8 threads from its 4 cores. The Intel Xeon E-2224G does not support hyper-threading, providing only 4 threads from its 4 cores. This gives the AMD chip a theoretical advantage in highly threaded workloads, though the benchmark data shows a more complex picture.

The integrated graphics solutions also differ. The AMD chip includes Radeon Graphics with 384 shader processors, while the Intel Xeon features HD Graphics P630. Both processors support DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but the AMD part has a higher theoretical memory bandwidth at 51.2 GB/s versus the Intel's 42.7 GB/s. PCIe support is similar in generation (Gen 3), but the Intel chip offers 16 lanes from the CPU compared to the AMD's 12 lanes.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results paint a nuanced picture of performance across different workloads. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U scores 906, which is 40.7% higher than the Intel Xeon E-2224G's 644. This is the largest victory for the AMD chip among the head-to-head tests. The single-core Cinebench R15 result is even more lopsided in AMD's favor, with a score of 170 versus 90, representing an 88.9% advantage.

Moving to Cinebench R23, the results flip dramatically. The Intel Xeon E-2224G scores 6398 in multi-core, beating the AMD's 5341 by 16.5%. This reversal suggests that the newer Cinebench version scales differently with the Intel's higher clock speeds and larger L3 cache. However, in Cinebench R23 single-core, the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U reclaims the lead with a score of 1115, which is 23.5% higher than the Intel's 903.

Geekbench results favor the Intel processor in both tests. In multi-core, the Intel Xeon E-2224G scores 4299 versus the AMD's 4035, a 6.1% advantage. The single-core Geekbench test shows a larger gap, with the Intel scoring 1535 against the AMD's 1244, representing a 19% lead. This pattern suggests that the Intel chip's higher base and boost clocks (3.50/4.70 GHz versus 2.60/3.80 GHz) provide a significant advantage in Geekbench's workload characteristics.

Overall, the head-to-head results show three wins for each processor. The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U dominates in older Cinebench versions and single-core R23, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G excels in newer multi-threaded tests and Geekbench. The data indicates that the AMD chip's thread count advantage (8 vs 4) helps in some multi-core scenarios, but the Intel's higher clock speeds and larger L3 cache can overcome this in other workloads.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification category. The most striking difference is in TDP: the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U draws 15 watts, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G consumes 71 watts. This nearly 5x difference in power envelope explains the market positioning, with the AMD part designed for mobile devices and the Intel for server/workstation use.

Clock speeds also differ substantially. The Intel chip has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and boosts to 4.70 GHz, while the AMD runs at 2.60 GHz base and 3.80 GHz boost. The Intel's higher clocks are likely a key factor in its Geekbench single-core victory.

Memory bandwidth favors the AMD chip at 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s, despite both using dual-channel DDR4. ECC memory support is exclusive to the Intel Xeon, a critical feature for server reliability. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP6, while the Intel uses Intel Socket 1151. The AMD chip is built on 7 nm at TSMC, while the Intel uses 14 nm at Intel's own foundry.

The L2 cache configuration differs, with AMD providing 512 KB per core versus Intel's 256 KB per core. L3 cache is larger on the Intel at 8 MB shared versus 4 MB shared. The AMD chip has 8 threads from 4 cores, while the Intel has 4 threads from 4 cores. PCIe lanes differ at 12 for AMD and 16 for Intel, both Gen 3.

Production status also differs: the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U is listed as Active, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G is End-of-life. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $213, while the AMD chip has no listed launch MSRP. The AMD part was released on 2021-01-11, while the Intel was released on 2019-05-28. The Intel chip includes HD Graphics P630, while the AMD features Radeon Graphics 384SP.

The Verdict

The data shows that the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U and Intel Xeon E-2224G serve different purposes despite similar core counts. The AMD chip wins in Cinebench R15 both single and multi-core, with leads of 88.9% and 40.7% respectively, and also takes Cinebench R23 single-core with a 23.5% advantage. Its 15W TDP makes it suitable for mobile devices where power efficiency is paramount.

The Intel Xeon E-2224G counters with wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core (16.5% ahead), Geekbench multi-core (6.1% ahead), and Geekbench single-core (19% ahead). Its higher base and boost clocks, larger L3 cache, and ECC memory support make it a viable option for server/workstation deployments where reliability and single-threaded performance matter. The Intel's 71W TDP and end-of-life status are significant drawbacks, but its launch MSRP of $213 provides a reference point for its intended market.

Users seeking a mobile processor for general productivity and older benchmark workloads should consider the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, particularly given its superior performance in Cinebench R15 and lower power consumption. Those needing ECC memory support, higher clock speeds, and better Geekbench performance in a server context should look to the Intel Xeon E-2224G. The data does not indicate a clear overall winner, as each processor dominates in specific test categories that align with their respective market segments.