AMD Ryzen 3 5125C vs Intel Core i7-1180G7 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data for these two mobile processors comes from different test suites, which makes a direct apples-to-apples comparison challenging. The Intel Core i7-1180G7 has results from the Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 suites, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5125C has results from Geekbench. No head-to-head benchmark results exist in the database that directly pit these two against each other in the same test. However, the aggregate data tells a compelling story.

The Intel Core i7-1180G7 produces a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 6672 and a single-core score of 942. In Cinebench R20, it scores 2802 multi-core and 395 single-core. The R15 results show 672 multi-core and 94 single-core. These are solid numbers for a 4-core, 8-thread part. The Ryzen 3 5125C, by contrast, only has Geekbench results: 2566 multi-core and 1237 single-core. Without a shared benchmark, the database's average benchmark scores become the most useful point of comparison.

The average benchmark score for the Intel part is 1930, while the AMD part sits at 1902. That is a 28-point gap in favor of Intel, roughly a 1.5% difference. The Ryzen 3 5125C is positioned close to the Intel Core i3-9100F, with a delta of -0.1%, and the Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 at -0.3%. The Core i7-1180G7 sits near the AMD Opteron 6348 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core i3-10300 at -0.2%, and the Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 at 0.3%. Both chips land at the 43rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating they occupy a similar performance tier overall.

The single-core story is more nuanced. The Intel chip's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 942 is its strongest relative showing, while the AMD chip's Geekbench single-core score of 1237 cannot be directly converted. What the data does show is that both processors cluster around the same average score, which suggests that the Ryzen 3 5125C, despite having only 2 cores and 4 threads, manages to hold its own against the 4-core, 8-thread Intel part in aggregate performance. The Intel chip wins on raw multi-threaded throughput as evidenced by its Cinebench numbers, but the AMD chip's efficiency per core appears competitive given its much smaller core count.

The wins tally in the database shows 0 wins for each side, which reflects the absence of direct head-to-head benchmark entries rather than a true tie. The recorded data indicates that the Intel processor is the stronger multi-core performer, while the AMD processor's single-core Geekbench result is notably high for a 2-core part.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-1180G7 has an average benchmark score of 1930, which is 28 points higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 5125C's 1902.

Q: How do these processors compare in terms of CPU core count?

A: The Intel Core i7-1180G7 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5125C has 2 cores and 4 threads. The Intel chip has double the core and thread count.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i7-1180G7 has a TDP of 9 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5125C has a TDP of 15 watts. The Intel chip is rated for significantly lower power consumption.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. Both the Intel Core i7-1180G7 and the AMD Ryzen 3 5125C have ECC memory support listed as false.

Q: What is the production status of each processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-1180G7 is marked as end-of-life, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5125C is marked as active.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5125C has a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, which is higher than the Intel Core i7-1180G7's 34.1 GB/s.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is substantial. The Intel Core i7-1180G7 is built on the Tiger Lake architecture, specifically the Tiger Lake-U codename, using the Willow Cove-U microarchitecture. It is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node at Intel's own foundry. The die size is 144 mm². The AMD Ryzen 3 5125C belongs to the 5000 series and uses the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne-U codename. It is built on TSMC's 7 nm process node and has a die size of 180 mm². AMD's chip also lists a transistor count of 10,700 million, while Intel's transistor count is not recorded in the database.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. The Intel chip has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 1.25 MB per core, and a shared L3 cache of 12 MB. The AMD chip has a smaller per-core footprint: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip's larger L3 cache, combined with its extra cores, gives it a cache advantage that likely contributes to its higher multi-threaded scores.

Memory support also diverges. The Intel part supports LPDDR4X memory in a dual-channel configuration, while the AMD part supports DDR4 in dual-channel. The AMD chip's memory bandwidth is higher at 51.2 GB/s versus 34.1 GB/s for Intel. PCIe capabilities differ as well: Intel offers Gen 4 with 4 lanes (CPU only), while AMD offers Gen 3 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ too, with Intel using Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 with 96 execution units and AMD using Radeon Vega 3.

The release timelines are separated by over a year. The Intel Core i7-1180G7 was released on 2021-03-30, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5125C came later on 2022-05-04. The Intel chip is now end-of-life, whereas the AMD chip remains active in production.

Specification Differences

The core specification differences between the Intel Core i7-1180G7 and the AMD Ryzen 3 5125C are pronounced. The Intel chip has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the AMD chip has 2 cores and 4 threads. Base clock speeds differ significantly: the Intel part runs at 1300.00 MHz, while the AMD part runs at 3000.00 MHz. The Intel chip has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the AMD chip has no recorded boost clock in the database.

TDP ratings show a 6-watt gap, with Intel at 9 watts and AMD at 15 watts. The sockets are incompatible: Intel uses BGA 1598, while AMD uses Socket FP6. Process nodes differ, with Intel on 10 nm and AMD on 7 nm. The foundries are different as well, with Intel using its own fabs and AMD using TSMC. Die sizes are 144 mm² for Intel and 180 mm² for AMD. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $426, while the AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP.

Memory support differs in type: LPDDR4X for Intel and DDR4 for AMD. Memory bandwidth favors AMD at 51.2 GB/s versus Intel's 34.1 GB/s. PCIe generation and lane counts differ, with Intel offering Gen 4 with 4 lanes and AMD offering Gen 3 with 8 lanes. The integrated graphics are different models, with Intel's Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 96EU versus AMD's Radeon Vega 3. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The part numbers differ, with Intel's SRK0D and AMD's 100-000000xxx.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split based on workload and priorities. The Intel Core i7-1180G7 should be the choice for users who need multi-threaded throughput. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 6672, paired with its 4 cores and 8 threads, gives it a significant advantage in any task that can utilize multiple cores simultaneously. Its lower TDP of 9 watts also suggests it can sustain these workloads more efficiently than the AMD part's 15-watt rating. The Intel chip's average benchmark score of 1930 also edges out the AMD's 1902, confirming its overall aggregate lead despite the absence of direct benchmark overlap.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5125C is the pick for users who prioritize per-core performance and memory bandwidth. Its base clock of 3000.00 MHz is more than double the Intel chip's 1300.00 MHz base, and its 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth exceeds Intel's 34.1 GB/s. Its Geekbench single-core score of 1237 is high for a 2-core part, suggesting strong single-threaded performance. The AMD chip is also still in active production status, ensuring ongoing availability, while the Intel chip is end-of-life.

For users who need a processor for light, responsive single-threaded work and value a current production status, the AMD Ryzen 3 5125C makes sense. For users who need maximum multi-core muscle for rendering or content creation, the Intel Core i7-1180G7 is the data-backed recommendation. Neither chip is a market leader, as both sit at the 43rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, placing them in the mid-range of the overall performance spectrum.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-1180G7 wins in multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by its Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core scores of 672, 2802, and 6672 respectively. These numbers indicate strong scaling across its 4 cores and 8 threads. It also wins on cache capacity, with 12 MB of shared L3 cache versus AMD's 8 MB, and on PCIe generation, offering Gen 4 compared to AMD's Gen 3. The Intel chip's lower TDP of 9 watts makes it the better choice for fanless or ultra-portable designs where power consumption is critical.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5125C wins on memory bandwidth, with 51.2 GB/s versus Intel's 34.1 GB/s, which benefits memory-intensive workloads. Its higher base clock of 3000.00 MHz versus Intel's 1300.00 MHz gives it an edge in lightly threaded tasks that rely on raw clock speed rather than core count. The AMD chip's smaller L1 cache of 64 KB per core versus Intel's 80 KB per core is a spec loss, but its 7 nm process node from TSMC offers a manufacturing advantage in transistor density. The AMD part also wins on production status, remaining active while Intel's chip is end-of-life.

The database's wins tally shows 0 for both, but the recorded benchmark data tells a different story depending on the workload. The Intel chip is the multi-core champion, while the AMD chip holds its own in single-core scenarios and memory-bound tasks. The choice between them hinges on whether the user values the Intel chip's higher thread count and larger L3 cache or the AMD chip's higher clock speed, memory bandwidth, and active production status.