AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE vs Intel Xeon D-1577 Comparison
AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE
Xeon D-1577
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE vs Intel Xeon D-1577
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Xeon D-1577 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE has 4 cores and 8 threads.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE boosts to 4.00 GHz, whereas the Intel Xeon D-1577 boosts to 2.10 GHz. The AMD part also has a higher base clock at 3.50 GHz versus 1.30 GHz for the Xeon.
Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE is built on a 7 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Xeon D-1577 uses a 14 nm process from Intel. The AMD chip also has a smaller die size at 156 mm² compared to 246 mm².
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE and the Intel Xeon D-1577 support ECC memory.
Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE includes Radeon Vega 6 integrated graphics. The Intel Xeon D-1577 has no integrated graphics listed in the database.
Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE has an average benchmark score of 2759, while the Intel Xeon D-1577 has an average score of 2715. The AMD chip sits in the 50th percentile of all CPUs, and the Xeon also sits in the 50th percentile.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE uses the Zen 2 architecture under the Renoir codename, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It packs 9,800 million transistors into a 156 mm² die. The Intel Xeon D-1577 uses the older Broadwell architecture under the Broadwell-DE codename, built on a 14 nm process at Intel, with 3,200 million transistors on a 246 mm² die. The node advantage is substantial: the AMD part fits more than three times as many transistors into a smaller physical area.
Cache organization differs as well. The Ryzen 3 4300GE has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 4 MB L3 cache. The Xeon D-1577 also has 64 KB of L1 per core but only 256 KB of L2 per core, with L3 arranged as 1.5 MB per core. With 16 cores, the Xeon's aggregate L3 is much larger, but the per-core L2 is halved compared to the AMD design.
Memory support shows a clear generational split. The Ryzen 3 4300GE supports DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration with a listed memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Xeon D-1577 supports both DDR3 and DDR4 in dual-channel mode, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory, which matters for reliability-focused workloads.
PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 3, while the Intel part lists PCIe Gen 3 with 24 lanes (CPU only). The Xeon is a server/workstation part on the Intel BGA 1667 socket, whereas the Ryzen 3 4300GE is a desktop part on AMD Socket AM4. The Ryzen has an unlocked multiplier; the Xeon is locked. The AMD chip includes Radeon Vega 6 integrated graphics, while the Xeon has none. The Xeon carries a launch MSRP of 1379.
The Verdict
The data presents a curious case. Despite having 12 fewer cores and 24 fewer threads, the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE wins every single benchmark in the head-to-head comparison. The margins are small, between 1.5% and 1.6% across all six Cinebench tests, but they are consistent. This means the 4-core Zen 2 design with its 4.00 GHz boost clock outruns the 16-core Broadwell part with its 2.10 GHz boost clock in both single-threaded and multi-threaded Cinebench workloads.
For buyers prioritizing single-threaded responsiveness, the Ryzen 3 4300GE is the clear choice. Its single-core scores of 135, 565, and 1346 in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 respectively all beat the Xeon's 133, 556, and 1325. The higher clock speed and newer architecture more than compensate for the core deficit in these tests.
For multi-threaded workloads, the result is more surprising. The Xeon's 16 cores and 32 threads would normally be expected to dominate a 4-core part, yet the Ryzen 3 4300GE still edges ahead: 961 versus 946 in R15, 4006 versus 3943 in R20, and 9540 versus 9389 in R23. The 7 nm Zen 2 cores are efficient enough to overcome the Xeon's raw core count in this specific benchmark suite.
The Xeon D-1577 remains relevant for server and workstation environments where ECC memory, DDR3 compatibility, and 24 PCIe Gen 3 lanes matter. The Ryzen 3 4300GE is the better pick for desktop use where integrated graphics, an unlocked multiplier, and higher clock speeds are beneficial. The data shows that the Ryzen 3 4300GE wins on raw Cinebench performance, but the Xeon D-1577 offers a different feature set that may suit specific deployment scenarios.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category.
| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE | Intel Xeon D-1577 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Base Clock | 3.50 GHz | 1.30 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 4.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |
| TDP | 35 W | 45 W |
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel BGA 1667 |
| Architecture | Zen 2 | Broadwell |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
| Transistors | 9,800 million | 3,200 million |
| Die Size | 156 mm² | 246 mm² |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (shared) | 1.5 MB (per core) |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3, DDR4 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | Not listed |
| PCIe | Gen 3 | Gen 3, 24 Lanes (CPU only) |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 | None |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Server/Workstation |
| Release Date | 2020-07-20 | 2016-02-23 |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |
| Launch MSRP | Not listed | 1379 |
Both processors support ECC memory, both use dual-channel memory buses, and both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part is newer by over four years, which explains many of the architectural advantages.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The head-to-head comparison consists of six Cinebench tests, and the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE wins all six. The margins are remarkably consistent, hovering around 1.6% for most tests.
In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Ryzen 3 4300GE scores 961 against the Xeon D-1577's 946, a 1.6% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows 135 versus 133, a 1.5% edge. These are narrow margins, but they hold across every workload.
Cinebench R20 repeats the pattern. The multicore result is 4006 for the AMD part versus 3943 for the Intel part, another 1.6% gap. The single-core test shows 565 versus 556, again 1.6%. The consistency of these deltas suggests a stable performance relationship between the two chips, not a workload-specific fluke.
Cinebench R23, the most demanding of the three versions, shows the same story. The multicore score is 9540 for the Ryzen 3 4300GE and 9389 for the Xeon D-1577, a 1.6% difference. The single-core score is 1346 versus 1325, also 1.6%.
The most notable aspect of these results is that the 4-core, 8-thread AMD part beats the 16-core, 32-thread Intel part even in multicore tests. The Xeon's core advantage is completely neutralized by its lower clock speeds and older architecture. The Ryzen 3 4300GE's 4.00 GHz boost clock versus the Xeon's 2.10 GHz boost clock appears to be the decisive factor.
Average benchmark scores reflect the same ordering. The Ryzen 3 4300GE averages 2759 across all recorded benchmarks, while the Xeon D-1577 averages 2715. The AMD part's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 3 5400U at 2765 (0.2% ahead), the Intel Xeon E-2176M at 2751 (0.3% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE at 2767 (0.3% ahead). The Xeon D-1577's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11390H at 2715 (0% difference), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U at 2713 (0.1% ahead), and the Intel Xeon E-2226G at 2709 (0.2% ahead).
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE wins every Cinebench benchmark in this comparison, so its advantages are straightforward. It wins in single-threaded performance, which matters for everyday desktop responsiveness, application loading, and lightly threaded workloads. It also wins in multi-threaded performance across all three Cinebench versions, which is remarkable given the Xeon's 4x core count advantage.
The Ryzen 3 4300GE also wins on efficiency-oriented specifications. Its 35 W TDP is lower than the Xeon's 45 W. It includes Radeon Vega 6 integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a discrete GPU in basic desktop systems. Its unlocked multiplier appeals to users who want to adjust clock speeds. Its 7 nm process and 156 mm² die size indicate a modern, power-efficient design.
The Intel Xeon D-1577 wins in areas that the Cinebench benchmarks do not capture. Its 16 cores and 32 threads provide headroom for heavily threaded server workloads that may scale differently than Cinebench. Its 1.5 MB per core L3 cache arrangement gives it a large aggregate cache pool across all cores. It supports DDR3 in addition to DDR4, which can matter for legacy server deployments. Its 24 PCIe Gen 3 lanes (CPU only) provide more direct PCIe connectivity for server peripherals. Its market segment is explicitly server/workstation, and its launch MSRP of 1379 positions it as a professional-grade part.
The database also shows the Xeon D-1577 has no integrated graphics, which is typical for server processors but means it requires a discrete GPU for any display output. The Ryzen 3 4300GE, by contrast, is a self-contained desktop solution.
The usage split is therefore clear. The Ryzen 3 4300GE is the choice for desktop systems where Cinebench performance, integrated graphics, clock speed, and efficiency matter. The Xeon D-1577 is the choice for server environments where core count, ECC memory support, DDR3 compatibility, and PCIe lane count take priority over raw benchmark scores. The data shows the Ryzen winning every measured test, but the Xeon's feature set serves a different purpose.