AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE vs Intel Core i5-11300H Comparison

The Intel Core i5-11300H and AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE are both 4-core, 8-thread processors, but they target different market segments: the former is a mobile part for laptops, while the latter is a desktop APU. Benchmark data reveals a consistent, though modest, performance advantage for the AMD chip across all measured Cinebench workloads, despite the Intel part boasting a higher boost clock and a newer PCIe generation. The data shows the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE winning all six head-to-head comparisons, with margins ranging from 4.3% to 4.4%, which positions it as the faster CPU in purely computational tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results paint a clear picture: the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE wins in every single benchmark category where both processors were tested. This includes both single-core and multi-core workloads across three different versions of Cinebench (R15, R20, and R23). The AMD chip’s lead is remarkably consistent, with a deltaPct of -4.4% in R15 and R20 single-core tests, and -4.3% in R20 and R23 multi-core tests. There is no benchmark category in which the Intel Core i5-11300H comes out ahead.

Given this sweep, the use-case split is straightforward. For users prioritizing raw CPU rendering performance in applications like Cinebench, the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE is the clear choice. Its wins are not isolated to one type of workload; they span both single-threaded and multi-threaded scenarios, indicating a holistic performance advantage. The Intel part, however, is designed for mobile platforms, suggesting its primary advantage lies in its form factor and platform integration rather than absolute benchmark scores. Its integrated Iris XE 80EU graphics and PCIe Gen 4 support offer feature-set advantages for laptop designs, but in the compute-centric benchmarks provided, the AMD processor is the unequivocal winner.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The Intel Core i5-11300H uses the Tiger Lake-H architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size of 146.1 mm². In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE is based on the Zen 2 architecture (Renoir codename), manufactured by TSMC on a 7 nm process, with a die size of 156 mm² and a transistor count of 9,800 million. This process node difference is significant, as the smaller 7 nm node typically offers better power efficiency per transistor.

Cache configurations also differ substantially. The Intel part has a larger L3 cache at 8 MB (shared), compared to the AMD’s 4 MB (shared). However, the Intel chip has smaller per-core L1 and L2 caches: 80 KB and 1.25 MB per core, respectively, versus AMD’s 64 KB and 512 KB per core. The memory bandwidth is identical at 51.2 GB/s, with both supporting dual-channel DDR4 memory. A notable feature difference is that the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i5-11300H does not. Furthermore, the Intel chip offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), whereas the AMD part is limited to PCIe Gen 3.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-11300H has a higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz, compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE’s 4.00 GHz. Despite this, the AMD chip still wins all single-core benchmark tests.

Q: How significant is the performance difference in multi-core workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE leads by 4.3% to 4.4% in multi-core tests. For instance, in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD scores 9540 versus Intel’s 9127, a difference of 413 points.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory bandwidth?

A: Yes, both support dual-channel DDR4 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Neither processor’s memory bus configuration offers a bandwidth advantage over the other.

Q: Are these processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel Core i5-11300H does not. This indicates that the AMD part allows for user-controlled overclocking, whereas the Intel part is locked.

Q: What are the platform sockets for these CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-11300H uses the Intel BGA 1449 socket, which is a mobile platform. The AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE uses the AMD Socket AM4, a desktop platform. This makes them incompatible with each other’s motherboards.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-11300H has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 2792, compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE’s 2759. However, this average includes Geekbench scores for the Intel part, which are not available for the AMD part, affecting the comparison.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ on several key specification points, as detailed below.

| Specification | Intel Core i5-11300H | AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE |

|---|---|---|

| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |

| Architecture | Tiger Lake | Zen 2 |

| Codename | Tiger Lake-H | Renoir |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not specified | 9,800 million |

| Die Size | 146.1 mm² | 156 mm² |

| Base Clock | 2.60 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1449 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3 |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris XE 80EU | Radeon Vega 6 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2021-01-10 | 2020-07-20 |

| Launch MSRP | $309 | Not specified |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Part Number | SRKH6 | 100-000000151 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark results are uniformly in favor of the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE, with the Intel Core i5-11300H not winning a single test. The most substantial margin, at 4.4%, appears in Cinebench R15 for both multi-core and single-core tests. In the R15 multi-core test, the AMD scores 961 against Intel’s 919, a 42-point gap. The single-core R15 test shows a smaller absolute difference, with AMD at 135 and Intel at 129.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the AMD leads by 4.3% in multi-core and 4.4% in single-core. The multi-core scores are 4006 for AMD and 3833 for Intel, a 173-point difference. In single-core, the scores are 565 and 540, respectively. This consistent percentage delta suggests that the performance advantage scales evenly across different workload types, indicating a fundamental architectural or clock efficiency benefit for the AMD design.

The final set of benchmarks, Cinebench R23, shows the same pattern. The AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE achieves a multi-core score of 9540, which is 413 points higher than the Intel’s 9127, a 4.3% lead. The single-core score for AMD is 1346, versus Intel’s 1288, also a 4.3% difference. These results are particularly telling because the Intel chip has a higher boost clock (4.40 GHz vs 4.00 GHz) and a larger L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB). Despite these apparent advantages, the AMD part consistently outperforms it, suggesting that the Zen 2 architecture’s efficiency per clock, enabled by the 7 nm process, is more impactful in these rendering workloads. The data shows a clear and consistent victory for the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE across all six head-to-head comparisons.