AMD Ryzen 3 3300X vs Intel Xeon E-2224G Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads available for parallel workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has 8 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G has 4 threads. This thread advantage is the primary reason the AMD part wins the multicore benchmark tests in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon E-2224G support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Xeon E-2224G supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X does not support ECC memory. This is a significant differentiator for workstation or server use cases where data integrity is critical.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2224G has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, compared to 4.30 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X. Despite this higher boost clock, the AMD part still wins the single-core benchmark comparisons in the recorded data.

Q: What is the process node difference between these two CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G uses a 14 nm process at Intel. The smaller node contributes to the AMD chip's smaller die size of 74 mm² versus 126 mm² for the Intel part.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2224G includes HD Graphics P630. The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output on that platform.

Q: What is the production status of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is listed as Active production, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G is End-of-life. This matters for long-term availability and platform planning.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X uses the Zen 2 architecture with the Matisse codename, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Xeon E-2224G uses the Coffee Lake architecture with the Coffee Lake-S WS codename, built on a 14 nm process at Intel. These are fundamentally different designs from different generations and manufacturing technologies.

The AMD chip has 4 cores and 8 threads, leveraging simultaneous multithreading to process two threads per core. The Intel Xeon E-2224G has 4 cores and 4 threads, with no multithreading support. This means the AMD processor can handle double the thread count in threaded workloads, which directly explains its strong multicore benchmark results.

Cache layouts differ substantially. Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core, but the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has 512 KB of L2 cache per core while the Intel part has 256 KB per core. The L3 cache also differs: 16 MB shared on the AMD, 8 MB shared on the Intel. The AMD chip has double the L3 capacity and double the per-core L2, giving it a memory hierarchy advantage.

The transistor counts tell a story of design density. The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X packs 3,800 million transistors into a 74 mm² die, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G has a 126 mm² die with no transistor count listed in the database. The process node difference is stark: 7 nm versus 14 nm.

Memory bandwidth also favors AMD. Both support dual-channel DDR4, but the Ryzen 3 3300X has a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s for the Xeon. PCIe support differs as well: the AMD chip has Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel chip has Gen 3 with 16 lanes.

The Intel Xeon E-2224G has integrated HD Graphics P630, which the AMD part lacks entirely. ECC memory support is exclusive to the Intel Xeon, which aligns with its Server/Workstation market segment. The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is a Desktop part, while the Xeon is a Server/Workstation part.

The Intel chip has a higher boost clock at 4.70 GHz versus 4.30 GHz on the AMD, and a slightly higher TDP at 71 W versus 65 W. The AMD multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, while the Intel multiplier is locked.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records four head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors, and the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X wins all four. The scale of the victories varies widely, from a razor-thin margin to a massive blowout.

In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Ryzen 3 3300X scores 1071 against 644 for the Xeon E-2224G. That is a 66.3% advantage for the AMD chip. This is the largest multicore gap in the head-to-head data and reflects the thread count difference: 8 threads versus 4 threads.

The Cinebench R15 singlecore result is even more lopsided in percentage terms. The AMD part scores 195, while the Intel part scores 90. The delta is 116.7%, meaning the Ryzen 3 3300X more than doubles the Xeon's single-core score in this test. This is notable because the Intel chip has a higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz, yet the AMD architecture still dominates in this benchmark.

Geekbench multicore shows a 34.3% win for the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, with scores of 5772 versus 4299. The gap is smaller than in Cinebench R15 multicore, but still a decisive victory. This pattern suggests the AMD chip's thread advantage and cache configuration translate into consistent multicore gains across different benchmark suites.

Geekbench singlecore is the closest contest. The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X scores 1555, and the Intel Xeon E-2224G scores 1535. The delta is only 1.3%, which is within the margin of measurement noise. In practical terms, these two processors are effectively tied in Geekbench singlecore, with a slight edge to AMD.

The overall benchmark picture is clear: the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X wins every recorded head-to-head test, with margins ranging from 1.3% to 116.7%. The Intel Xeon E-2224G does not win a single benchmark in the head-to-head comparison. Average benchmark scores tell a similar story: the AMD part averages 2148, while the Intel part averages 2117. The AMD chip also holds a 47th percentile versus all CPUs, just ahead of the Xeon's 46th percentile.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification category. The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has 8 threads versus 4 threads on the Intel Xeon E-2224G. Base clocks are 3.80 GHz for AMD and 3.50 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 4.30 GHz for AMD and 4.70 GHz for Intel, the only clock speed where Intel leads.

TDP differs slightly: 65 W for the AMD chip, 71 W for the Intel chip. The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1151. These are incompatible platforms, so choosing one locks you into a specific motherboard ecosystem.

The process node is 7 nm for AMD and 14 nm for Intel. Die size is 74 mm² for AMD and 126 mm² for Intel. Transistor count is 3,800 million for AMD, with no figure listed for Intel. L2 cache is 512 KB per core on AMD versus 256 KB per core on Intel. L3 cache is 16 MB shared on AMD versus 8 MB shared on Intel.

Memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s for AMD versus 42.7 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory support is absent on AMD and present on Intel. PCIe generation is Gen 4 for AMD and Gen 3 for Intel, both with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are absent on AMD and present as HD Graphics P630 on Intel.

The market segments differ: Desktop for AMD, Server/Workstation for Intel. Production status is Active for AMD and End-of-life for Intel. The AMD multiplier is unlocked; the Intel multiplier is locked. Release dates differ: the AMD chip launched on 2020-04-23, the Intel chip on 2019-05-28. The launch MSRP for the AMD part is $120, and for the Intel part it is $213.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X wins in all benchmark categories recorded in the database. Its multicore strength is the most pronounced, with a 66.3% advantage in Cinebench R15 multicore and a 34.3% advantage in Geekbench multicore. This makes it the clear choice for threaded workloads such as video rendering, compilation, or any task that scales with core and thread count. The 8-thread configuration and larger cache hierarchy drive these results.

The AMD part also wins single-core tests, though by a smaller margin in Geekbench. The 1.3% Geekbench singlecore edge is negligible, but the 116.7% Cinebench R15 singlecore advantage is enormous. For lightly threaded tasks that rely on single-core performance, the AMD chip ranges from a tie to a dominant win depending on the benchmark.

The Intel Xeon E-2224G has no benchmark wins in the head-to-head data, but it has features that matter outside of raw performance. ECC memory support is the standout feature, making it suitable for systems where memory error correction is non-negotiable. The integrated HD Graphics P630 provides a display output without a discrete GPU, which can simplify a basic workstation build.

The Xeon also has a higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz, though the benchmark data shows this does not translate into superior single-core results. Its Server/Workstation market segment and locked multiplier indicate it is designed for stability and reliability rather than overclocking or enthusiast use. The smaller 8 MB L3 cache and 4-thread limitation hold it back in the recorded benchmarks.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the Intel Xeon E-2224G in every recorded head-to-head test. The AMD chip wins 4 out of 4 comparisons, with margins from 1.3% to 116.7%. For anyone building a system where CPU performance matters, the Ryzen 3 3300X is the stronger choice based on the numbers.

The AMD part also offers a more modern platform: 7 nm process, PCIe Gen 4, higher memory bandwidth, double the L3 cache, and an unlocked multiplier. It is cheaper at launch with a $120 MSRP versus $213 for the Xeon, and it remains Active in production while the Xeon is End-of-life. The Ryzen 3 3300X is the better all-around processor for desktop workloads.

The Intel Xeon E-2224G has a narrower appeal. Its ECC memory support and integrated graphics are features the AMD chip cannot offer. These matter for specific workstation or server scenarios where data integrity and a simple display output are priorities. If those features are essential, the Xeon is the only option between the two, despite its lower benchmark scores.

The Geekbench singlecore result shows the two are nearly equal in that specific test, so the Intel chip is not universally slower. But the overall pattern is decisive. The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X delivers better performance across the board, on a more advanced platform, with a lower launch price. The Intel Xeon E-2224G should only be selected when ECC memory or integrated graphics are mandatory requirements. For general compute performance, the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is the clear winner in this comparison.