AMD Ryzen 3 3250U vs Intel Core i3-10110Y Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U and Intel Core i3-10110Y are both 2-core, 4-thread mobile processors that land in the same performance tier, with identical average benchmark scores of 908 and the same 24th percentile ranking among all CPUs. Despite this overall parity, their benchmark results reveal starkly different performance profiles across specific workloads, with the AMD chip dominating in legacy multi-core and modern single-core tests while the Intel part surges ahead in a newer multi-threaded workload.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic gap between these two processors appears in the Cinebench R23 single-core test, where the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U scores 776 against the Intel Core i3-10110Y’s 372. That represents a 108.6% advantage for the AMD part — more than double the performance. This is a decisive win that suggests the Ryzen 3’s Zen architecture extracts significantly more instructions per clock in lightly-threaded scenarios, or that the Intel part’s power constraints heavily limit its single-core burst performance.

In the older Cinebench R15 multi-core test, the Ryzen 3 3250U again comes out ahead, posting 353 points versus 265 for the Core i3-10110Y. The 33.2% delta here is substantial, indicating that in this particular workload, the AMD chip’s 2.60 GHz base clock and 3.50 GHz boost clock translate into better sustained multi-threaded throughput than the Intel part’s 1.00 GHz base clock, even though the latter boosts to 4.00 GHz.

The picture flips entirely in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, where the Intel Core i3-10110Y scores 2640 compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U’s 2010. The Intel part leads by 23.9%, a significant reversal that likely reflects how the newer R23 workload scales with the higher boost clock and different cache hierarchy of the Comet Lake architecture. Notably, the Intel chip’s R23 multi-core score is 630 points higher than its R15 score would suggest, while the AMD chip’s R23 score is proportionally lower, hinting that the two architectures respond very differently to the newer benchmark’s instruction mix.

When looking at the broader benchmark suite, the Ryzen 3 3250U also holds advantages in other tests not directly compared head-to-head. Its Geekbench multi-core score is 1467 and single-core is 722, while the Intel i3-10110Y has no Geekbench results listed. The AMD part also has a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 121.6, which is not matched by an equivalent Intel result. The Intel chip counters with Cinebench R20 scores of 1108 multi-core and 156 single-core, tests that the AMD processor does not appear in. This incomplete overlap makes direct comparison difficult, but the head-to-head data clearly shows each processor winning in specific scenarios.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is the clear winner in single-threaded performance based on the R23 single-core result, where it more than doubles the Intel part’s score. This makes it the stronger choice for applications that rely on fast response to individual tasks, such as web browsing, document editing, or any software that isn’t heavily optimized for multi-threading. Its 33.2% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core also suggests it handles older multi-threaded workloads more effectively, which could matter for legacy productivity applications or older games that scale across cores using DirectX 11-era threading models.

The Intel Core i3-10110Y takes the crown in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, outperforming the AMD chip by 23.9%. This indicates it is better suited for modern multi-threaded rendering or encoding workloads that take advantage of the newer benchmark’s optimizations. The Intel part’s presence in R20 testing, where it scores 1108 multi-core and 156 single-core, further suggests it has a more balanced profile across newer Cinebench versions, even though its R23 single-core result is surprisingly weak. For users running contemporary creative tools that leverage R23-style workloads, the Intel chip would likely deliver faster completion times.

The wins break down as two for the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U and one for the Intel Core i3-10110Y in the direct head-to-head comparisons. However, the magnitude of the AMD single-core win (108.6%) far exceeds the Intel multi-core advantage (23.9%), which could make the AMD part more versatile overall. The Intel chip’s higher boost clock of 4.00 GHz versus 3.50 GHz does not translate into single-core superiority, suggesting that power delivery or thermal limits in the 9W TDP envelope cap its real-world performance below what clock speed alone would predict.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U and the Intel Core i3-10110Y have an identical average benchmark score of 908, placing them at the same 24th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How much faster is the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U in single-core performance?

A: In the Cinebench R23 single-core test, the Ryzen 3 3250U scores 776 versus 372 for the Core i3-10110Y, a 108.6% advantage for the AMD processor.

Q: In which benchmark does the Intel Core i3-10110Y outperform the AMD chip?

A: The Intel part wins the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, scoring 2640 against the AMD’s 2010, a 23.9% lead.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for these two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U has a 15W TDP, while the Intel Core i3-10110Y has a 9W TDP, making the Intel chip more power-efficient on paper.

Q: Do both processors have the same core and thread counts?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U and the Intel Core i3-10110Y feature 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i3-10110Y boosts to 4.00 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U’s 3.50 GHz boost clock.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ most notably in their clock speeds and power envelopes. The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U operates at a 2.60 GHz base clock and 3.50 GHz boost clock, while the Intel Core i3-10110Y has a 1.00 GHz base clock and 4.00 GHz boost clock. This gives the Intel part a 0.50 GHz higher boost ceiling but a 1.60 GHz lower base frequency, a trade-off that explains the divergent benchmark results.

The TDP ratings also diverge significantly: the AMD chip draws 15W, while the Intel chip is rated at just 9W. This 6W difference makes the Intel part more suitable for fanless or ultra-thin designs, though the AMD chip’s higher power budget may allow it to sustain performance longer under load.

Memory support differs as well, with the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U supporting DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The Intel Core i3-10110Y lists DDR3 memory support, with no memory bus or bandwidth details provided. The AMD part also specifies PCIe Gen 3 support, while the Intel chip has no PCIe information listed.

The socket types are different: the AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP5, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1440. Both processors are in the mobile market segment, are currently active in production, and have locked multipliers. The AMD chip has a listed part number (YM3250C4T2OFG), while the Intel part does not.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is built on the Zen architecture with the codename Dali, part of the 3000 series and the Ryzen 3 generation (Zen Raven Ridge). It is fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with 3,500 million transistors on a 148 mm² die. The Intel Core i3-10110Y uses the Comet Lake architecture with the codename Comet Lake-Y, part of the Core 10th Gen series and the Core i3 generation. It is also on a 14 nm process, but fabricated by Intel, with no transistor count or die size listed.

Cache hierarchies show notable differences. The AMD part has 96 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 cache per core. Both share 4 MB of L3 cache, but the AMD chip’s larger per-core L1 and L2 caches likely contribute to its strong single-core performance, as more data can be held closer to the execution units.

The integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U features Radeon Vega 3 graphics, while the Intel Core i3-10110Y uses UHD Graphics. Neither processor supports ECC memory. The release dates are also different, with the Intel chip launching on August 20, 2019, and the AMD chip launching on January 5, 2020. Neither processor has a launch MSRP listed in the data, and neither has a 3D V-Cache option.