AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE vs Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE and the Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 represent two opposite ends of the computing spectrum: a modern, low-power desktop APU against an older, high-core-count server processor. The benchmark data reveals a remarkably close contest, with the Ryzen chip winning all six head-to-head Cinebench comparisons, albeit by extremely narrow margins that never exceed 0.6%. This analysis examines the data to determine which processor holds the edge in specific workloads and for which user the differences matter.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has an average benchmark score of 1787, while the Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 scores 1777. The Ryzen chip also sits in the 42nd percentile of all CPUs, compared to the Xeon’s 41st percentile.

Q: How does the AMD chip compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3?

A: According to the nearestRivals data, the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE is 0.6% ahead of the Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 in average benchmark score. From the Xeon’s perspective, the Ryzen chip is listed as a rival with a deltaPct of -0.6%, confirming the AMD processor’s slight edge.

Q: What is the most significant difference in their specifications?

A: The core and thread counts are the starkest contrast. The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Xeon also has a much larger 25 MB shared L3 cache compared to the AMD’s 4 MB shared L3.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE includes integrated graphics, featuring Radeon Vega 8. The Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 has no integrated graphics, which is typical for server-focused chips.

Q: What is the difference in their power envelopes?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has a TDP of 35 watts, whereas the Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 has a TDP of 105 watts. This makes the AMD chip significantly more power-efficient on paper.

Q: Which processor is still in production?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has an active production status, while the Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 is listed as end-of-life. The Xeon was released earlier, in 2015, compared to the Ryzen’s 2019 release.

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents a straightforward verdict for synthetic Cinebench workloads: the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE wins every single test. The margin of victory is consistent, ranging from 0.5% to 0.6% in multi-core tests and 0% to 0.6% in single-core tests. For users focused purely on these rendering benchmarks, the Ryzen 3 3200GE is the nominal performance leader. Its active production status and unlocked multiplier also suggest a more future-proof platform.

However, the Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 is the choice for workloads that leverage massive parallelism beyond what Cinebench captures. Its 10 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 25 MB L3 cache, provide a substantial resource pool that the 4-core, 4-thread AMD chip cannot match for heavily threaded server tasks. The Xeon’s quad-channel memory bus and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, alongside 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, target a fundamentally different workload class. This is not a chip for desktop gaming; it is a server chip for virtualized environments and multi-threaded databases. The data shows the Ryzen wins in these specific tests, but the Xeon’s architectural purpose is broader.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a clean sweep for the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD chip scores 622 against the Xeon’s 619, a 0.5% lead. The single-core test in R15 is a dead heat, with both processors scoring exactly 87.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the pattern holds. The Ryzen 3 3200GE scores 2595 in multi-core, while the Xeon E5-4610 v3 scores 2580, yielding a 0.6% advantage for AMD. In the R20 single-core test, the AMD chip scores 366 compared to 364, another 0.5% win.

The most recent Cinebench R23 results reinforce the trend. The AMD processor scores 6179 in multi-core, beating the Xeon’s 6144 by 0.6%. In the R23 single-core test, the Ryzen scores 872 against 867, a 0.6% margin. Across all six benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE secures 6 wins, while the Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 secures 0. The largest delta is 0.6%, indicating that while AMD is consistently ahead, the real-world performance difference in these specific tests is minimal.

Specification Differences

The specifications of these two processors diverge significantly, which explains their different market segments. The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, while the Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 has a base clock of 1700.00 MHz with no listed boost clock. The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel uses Intel Socket 2011-3.

Memory support differs, with the AMD chip using dual-channel DDR4 and a memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, while the Intel chip uses quad-channel DDR4 and offers 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities also differ: the AMD chip provides 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip provides 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes (CPU only).

The physical attributes are also distinct. The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE is built on a 12 nm process with 4,940 million transistors and a 210 mm² die size. The Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 uses a 22 nm process with 2,600 million transistors and a larger 356 mm² die size. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel chip is locked.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is fundamental. The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE is based on the Zen+ architecture, codenamed Picasso, and belongs to the 3000 series. It has 4 cores and 4 threads. Its cache hierarchy includes 96 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is fabricated by GlobalFoundries and includes the Radeon Vega 8 integrated GPU.

In contrast, the Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 uses the Haswell architecture, specifically codenamed Haswell-EP. It has 10 cores and 20 threads, a substantial difference. Its cache is organized with 64 KB of L1 per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, but its L3 cache is much larger at 25 MB shared. This larger cache is critical for server workloads. The Xeon is manufactured by Intel on a 22 nm process. The Intel chip lacks integrated graphics entirely, and its market segment is listed as Server/Workstation, whereas the AMD chip targets the Desktop market.