AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE vs Intel Core i3-9320 Comparison

The Intel Core i3-9320 and AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE are both 4-core, 4-thread desktop processors, yet they represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The data shows a consistent, albeit narrow, victory for the Intel part across every single benchmark, while the AMD chip counters with dramatically lower power consumption and a more modern feature set. Both CPUs occupy the same 42nd percentile in the global performance distribution, with average benchmark scores of 1808 for the Intel and 1787 for the AMD, placing them in a virtual dead heat for overall capability.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results are remarkably one-sided in favor of the Intel Core i3-9320, though the margins are consistently thin. In the Cinebench R15 multi-core test, the Intel chip scores 630 against the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE's 622, a 1.3% lead. This pattern repeats in the single-core iteration of the same test, where Intel's 88 points edge out AMD's 87 points by 1.1%.

Moving to the more demanding Cinebench R20 workload, the story remains unchanged. The i3-9320 posts a multi-core score of 2626, which is 1.2% ahead of the 3200GE's 2595. In single-core performance, Intel again takes the win with 370 points versus 366 points, a 1.1% margin. The most recent Cinebench R23 benchmark confirms the trend: the Intel processor scores 6254 in multi-core and 882 in single-core, while the AMD chip manages 6179 and 872 respectively, with deltas of 1.2% and 1.1% in Intel's favor.

The data indicates that the i3-9320 wins all six head-to-head matchups. However, the largest advantage is just 1.3%, meaning the Intel chip is never more than a fraction ahead. This suggests that the performance gap is not a chasm but rather a consistent, narrow edge that appears across all tested workloads. For users looking at raw benchmark numbers, the Intel part is technically superior in every category, but the differences are so small that they would be imperceptible in real-world use.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i3-9320 has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE's boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

Q: How much more power does the Intel processor consume?

A: The Intel Core i3-9320 has a TDP of 62 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has a TDP of 35 watts, making the AMD chip significantly more power-efficient on paper.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i3-9320 and the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE list ECC memory support as a feature.

Q: Which CPU has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i3-9320 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, which is double the 4 MB shared L3 cache found on the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE overclockable?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Intel Core i3-9320 does not, meaning only the AMD chip can be freely overclocked.

Q: What is the release date difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i3-9320 was released on 2019-04-22, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE followed later on 2019-07-06.

Architecture Differences

The two CPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures and manufacturing processes. The Intel Core i3-9320 uses the Coffee Lake architecture, specifically the Coffee Lake Refresh generation, fabricated on Intel's 14 nm process node with a die size of 126 mm². In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE employs the Zen+ architecture, codenamed Picasso, built on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries with a substantially larger die size of 210 mm².

The cache hierarchies diverge significantly. Intel allocates 64 KB of L1 cache and 256 KB of L2 cache per core, while AMD provides 96 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core. However, the shared L3 cache tells a different story: Intel offers 8 MB, while AMD halves that to 4 MB. The AMD chip also packs 4,940 million transistors, a figure not listed for the Intel part.

Integrated graphics differentiate the platforms further. The Intel i3-9320 carries UHD Graphics 630, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE is equipped with Radeon Vega 8. Both support DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but the memory bandwidth differs: Intel lists 38.4 GB/s, while AMD provides a higher 46.9 GB/s. Both CPUs offer PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Specification Differences

The most striking contrast lies in power consumption. The Intel Core i3-9320 has a TDP of 62 watts, nearly double the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE's 35 watts. Clock speeds also favor Intel: the i3-9320 runs at a 3.70 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost, while the 3200GE operates at 3.30 GHz base and 4.00 GHz boost.

Socket compatibility is entirely different. Intel uses Socket 1151, while AMD uses Socket AM4. The manufacturing process differs, with Intel on 14 nm and AMD on 12 nm. The die sizes are distinct at 126 mm² for Intel and 210 mm² for AMD. Cache configurations differ as detailed above, with Intel providing more L3 but less L1 and L2 per core.

The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $154, while no launch MSRP is listed for the AMD part. The Intel processor is marked as end-of-life, whereas the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE remains active in production. The AMD chip features an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, a capability the Intel part lacks. Their part numbers are SRF7X for Intel and YD3200C6M4MFH for AMD.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-9320 wins on raw benchmark performance, taking all six head-to-head Cinebench tests. Its higher base and boost clocks, combined with double the L3 cache, give it a measurable edge in both single-core and multi-core workloads. This makes it the stronger choice for users who prioritize maximum benchmark scores in lightly-threaded applications, where the 4.40 GHz boost clock can be fully utilized. The larger 8 MB L3 cache may also aid in scenarios with frequently reused data.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE wins on efficiency and platform features. Its 35-watt TDP makes it suitable for compact or low-power builds where thermal output and energy consumption are critical concerns. The unlocked multiplier offers overclocking headroom that the Intel chip cannot match. The Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics may provide different capabilities compared to Intel's UHD Graphics 630, though benchmark data does not cover this area. The higher memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s could benefit memory-sensitive tasks.

The production status is a key differentiator: the Intel chip is end-of-life, while the AMD chip remains active, suggesting better long-term availability for the Ryzen 3 3200GE. For users building a new system today, the AMD part offers an active production status, a lower power draw, and overclocking flexibility. For those chasing the absolute highest Cinebench numbers in this specific comparison, the Intel Core i3-9320 edges ahead, but the narrow margins mean the AMD chip's efficiency advantages may hold more practical weight in many real-world scenarios.