AMD Ryzen 3 3200G vs Intel Core i5-4570 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data for these two processors is decisive. The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G wins 15 of the 19 recorded benchmark comparisons, while the Intel Core i5-4570 takes 4. The margins, however, tell a more nuanced story than the raw win count.

Starting with the Cinebench suite, the AMD part is consistently and substantially ahead. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Ryzen 3 3200G scores 600 against the i5-4570's 447, a 25.5% advantage. That pattern repeats across every Cinebench version in the database. R20 multicore shows 2501 versus 1865, and R23 multicore shows 5955 versus 4442, both with a 25.4% delta. The single-core results are equally lopsided. The Ryzen leads by 25% in R15 single-core (84 versus 63) and by 25.4% in both R20 and R23 single-core (352 versus 263, and 840 versus 627). These are not marginal gains; they represent a generational leap in per-clock efficiency and raw throughput for the AMD part.

The Passmark suite tells a similar story in most categories. The Ryzen 3 3200G's data encryption score of 4475 dwarfs the i5-4570's 1321, a massive 70.5% difference. This is the single largest margin in the entire comparison. Integer math also favors AMD heavily: 20141 versus 15415, a 23.5% win. Multithread performance follows the same trend with a 25.2% advantage (7007 versus 5238). Data compression, floating point math, random string sorting, and single-thread throughput all go to AMD, with deltas of 12.1%, 10.4%, 4.2%, and 7% respectively. Even the physics test, which is nearly a tie at 397 versus 395, goes to AMD by a hair at 0.5%.

The Intel Core i5-4570 does hold some notable victories. The Geekbench results are particularly interesting because they buck the overall trend. In Geekbench multicore, Intel wins with 3118 versus 2833, a 10.1% margin. In Geekbench single-core, the lead expands to 17.8% (1041 versus 884). This suggests the older Haswell architecture retains strengths in certain workloads that the Zen+ design does not match. The Passmark extended instructions test also goes to Intel with a 27.4% win (5961 versus 4679). Finally, the prime number finding test shows Intel ahead by 34.8% (31 versus 23), the second-largest margin in either direction.

What stands out in this data is the consistency of the AMD wins. The 25% delta across the entire Cinebench family indicates a fundamental performance advantage in render-style workloads. Conversely, Intel's wins, while fewer, are concentrated in specific areas: Geekbench's particular mix and extended instruction handling. Neither processor is universally dominant; the choice depends heavily on which workloads matter most.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmarks overall?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G wins 15 of the 19 head-to-head comparisons. The Intel Core i5-4570 wins 4.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The biggest margin is in Passmark data encryption, where the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G scores 4475 versus Intel's 1321, a 70.5% difference in AMD's favor.

Q: Are there any tests where the Intel Core i5-4570 beats AMD by a wide margin?

A: Yes. In Passmark find prime numbers, Intel wins by 34.8% (31 versus 23). In Passmark extended instructions, Intel leads by 27.4% (5961 versus 4679). Intel also wins Geekbench single-core by 17.8% and multicore by 10.1%.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G scores 5955, while the Intel Core i5-4570 scores 4442. AMD holds a 25.4% advantage in this test.

Q: Is the single-thread performance difference as large as the multicore difference?

A: Yes, the pattern is very similar. Across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 single-core tests, AMD leads by 25% to 25.4% in each case.

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score overall?

A: The Intel Core i5-4570 has a higher average benchmark score at 7421, compared to AMD's 6931. This is despite AMD winning most of the direct comparisons, indicating Intel's wins may be in heavier-weight tests.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural eras and foundries. The Intel Core i5-4570 uses the Haswell architecture on a 22 nm process, fabricated by Intel. It integrates 1,400 million transistors on a 177 mm² die. The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G uses the Zen+ architecture, codenamed Picasso, built on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It packs 4,940 million transistors into a 210 mm² die. The AMD part has over three times the transistor count, which aligns with its more modern design and integrated graphics.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The Intel chip provides 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core, with 6 MB of shared L3. The AMD chip offers more per-core cache: 96 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core. However, its L3 is smaller at 4 MB shared. This trade-off, more private cache with less shared cache, reflects the different design philosophies. The larger per-core caches on AMD likely contribute to its strong single-thread results, while Intel's larger L3 pool may help in certain shared-data workloads.

Memory support is another split. Intel uses DDR3 with a dual-channel bus, while AMD uses DDR4, also dual-channel. This difference is significant for platform compatibility and potential memory bandwidth, although the database does not record specific bandwidth figures for either.

The integrated graphics solutions are also distinct. Intel includes the HD 4600 iGPU, while AMD includes the Radeon Vega 8. The Vega 8 is a more capable integrated solution for graphical tasks, though the database does not provide direct iGPU benchmark comparisons. Both processors use PCIe Gen 3. Neither supports ECC memory. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel chip does not. The Ryzen 3 3200G is listed as Active in production status, while the i5-4570's production status is not recorded.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are identical: both have 4 cores and 4 threads. The differences begin with clock speeds. The Intel i5-4570 has a 3.20 GHz base clock and a 3.60 GHz boost clock. The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G runs at 3.60 GHz base and 4.00 GHz boost, giving it a higher operating range across the board. This clock advantage directly supports the benchmark results.

Thermal design power differs notably. Intel is rated at 84 W, while AMD is rated at 65 W. The AMD part delivers higher performance at a lower rated TDP, which is a meaningful efficiency indicator. Sockets are incompatible: Intel uses Socket 1150, while AMD uses Socket AM4. This means any platform choice is exclusive to one processor or the other.

The process nodes are different: Intel at 22 nm versus AMD at 12 nm. This explains part of the transistor density difference. Intel's die is smaller at 177 mm² versus AMD's 210 mm². The AMD chip is also newer, with a release date in July 2019 versus Intel's June 2013 release. This six-year gap is visible in the architectural features.

Cache sizes differ as described above. The L1 and L2 per-core values are higher on AMD, while Intel has more L3. Memory support differs by generation: DDR3 for Intel, DDR4 for AMD. Both use dual-channel memory buses. Integrated graphics differ: Intel HD 4600 versus Radeon Vega 8. The multiplier is locked on Intel and unlocked on AMD. The part numbers also differ, with AMD's being YD3200C5M4MFH or YD3200C5FHBOX, and Intel's being SR14E.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear overall winner for most use cases. The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G wins 15 of 19 benchmarks, with consistent 25% leads across the entire Cinebench suite and a 70.5% blowout in data encryption. Its higher clock speeds, newer architecture, smaller process node, and lower TDP make it the more capable processor in the majority of recorded tests. The only serious caveats are the four Intel wins, which include substantial margins in extended instructions and prime number calculations.

However, the Intel Core i5-4570 is not without merit. Its Geekbench wins, particularly the 17.8% single-core margin, suggest it handles certain workload types better than the AMD part. Its higher average benchmark score of 7421 versus 6931 is also notable, even though AMD wins more direct comparisons. This indicates that Intel's winning tests may carry more weight in the aggregate scoring.

For a buyer choosing between platforms today, the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G is the stronger choice across most recorded workloads. Its advantages in rendering, encryption, integer math, and multithreaded tasks are decisive. The Intel part retains relevance only for specific applications that favor its extended instruction handling and particular Geekbench performance profile. The AMD part also offers a better efficiency profile with lower TDP and newer memory support.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G should be the pick for anyone prioritizing modern multi-threaded workloads. It wins all three Cinebench versions in both single and multicore tests by roughly 25%. This makes it the better choice for video rendering, 3D modeling, or any CPU-bound creative task that scales with Cinebench-style performance. Its 70.5% lead in data encryption makes it particularly suited for security-related workloads or any task involving cryptographic operations. The 23.5% integer math advantage and 25.2% multithread win reinforce its strength in general productivity and compiled code execution. The 12.1% data compression win and 10.4% floating point win also make it solid for file compression and scientific calculations.

The Intel Core i5-4570 retains a defined niche. Its 34.8% win in find prime numbers indicates a strong showing in certain mathematical or simulation workloads that rely on prime detection. The 27.4% extended instructions win suggests it handles specialized instruction sets more efficiently, which could matter for specific legacy applications or optimized libraries. Its Geekbench wins, 10.1% multicore and 17.8% single-core, point to strengths in the specific mix of real-world tasks that Geekbench models. For users running software that mirrors those patterns, the Intel part may still be competitive despite its age.

The physics test is a statistical tie at 397 versus 395, meaning neither processor has a meaningful edge there. The random string sorting test is close as well, with AMD ahead by only 4.2%. For those workloads, the choice between the two comes down to other factors like platform compatibility or integrated graphics needs. The AMD Radeon Vega 8 is the more capable iGPU, which matters for systems without a discrete graphics card. The Intel HD 4600 is older and less powerful. Ultimately, the recorded data favors AMD for most modern tasks, with Intel holding specific, narrower strengths.