AMD Ryzen 3 30 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 Comparison
AMD Ryzen 3 30
Snapdragon X1E-84-100
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 3 30 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data shows a direct comparison between these two mobile processors is unavailable in the database, as the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has no benchmark entries, while the AMD Ryzen 3 30 has a full set of PassMark results. The AMD part delivers an average benchmark score of 20,137, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs tracked. The Qualcomm part, by contrast, has an average score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile, indicating that no measured performance data has been recorded for it.
Because the head-to-head benchmark table is empty, the analysis must rely on the AMD processor's individual scores and its nearest rivals to contextualize its standing. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 achieves a multi-thread score of 9,027, a single-thread score of 2,465, and a floating-point math score of 14,448. Its integer math score reaches 29,846, while data compression scores 135,834 and data encryption scores 6,461. Extended instructions yield 6,075, find prime numbers returns 20, random string sorting produces 14,431, and physics scores 436.
The nearest rivals in the database provide a useful frame. The Intel Core Ultra 7 165U averages 20,249, which is 0.6% behind the AMD part. The Intel Core i7-9700K averages 20,271, 0.7% behind. Conversely, the AMD EPYC 7713P averages 20,024, which is 0.6% ahead of the Ryzen 3 30, and the Intel Core i7-11800H averages 19,998, 0.7% ahead. These deltas are narrow, showing the AMD Ryzen 3 30 sits in a tight cluster of comparable performers despite its modest core count.
The absence of any Qualcomm benchmark scores means no direct wins can be assigned. The wins counter shows 0 for both parts. The data indicates that any claims about the Snapdragon X1E-84-100's performance cannot be substantiated from the database, as no measurements exist.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 3 30?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 30 records an average benchmark score of 20,137, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs in the database.
Q: Does the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 have any benchmark scores?
A: No. The database shows an empty benchmark array for the Qualcomm part, with an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking. No performance measurements are recorded.
Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 3 30 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 165U?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 165U averages 20,249, which is 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 30's average of 20,137. The AMD part is marginally ahead.
Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two processors?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 30 supports LPDDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 supports LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The Qualcomm part offers higher bandwidth in the recorded specifications.
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Qualcomm part has three times the core count.
Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 30 is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC.
Architecture Differences
The two processors diverge sharply in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 uses the Zen 2 architecture under the Mendocino codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 100 mm². It has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. Its cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The thermal design power is 15 watts, and it fits the AMD Socket FT6.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 uses the Oryon codename under the Snapdragon X Elite generation, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has 12 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. Its cache hierarchy is markedly different: 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The thermal design power is 35 watts, and it uses the Qualcomm BGA 2073 socket.
Memory support differs as well. The AMD part uses LPDDR5 with a dual-channel bus delivering 88.0 GB/s. The Qualcomm part uses LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus delivering 135.2 GB/s. PCIe connectivity also differs: the AMD Ryzen 3 30 offers Gen 3 with 4 CPU-only lanes, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 offers Gen 4 with 12 CPU-only lanes. Integrated graphics are the Radeon 610M on the AMD side and the Adreno X1-85 on the Qualcomm side. Neither chip has a multiplier unlocked, and both lack ECC memory support.
The release dates show the Qualcomm part arrived earlier, on April 23, 2024, while the AMD part has a release date of September 30, 2025. The AMD part is listed as Active in production status, as is the Qualcomm part. The AMD processor has a part number labeled "unknown," while the Qualcomm part number is X1E84100.
The Verdict
The data supports a clear conclusion: the AMD Ryzen 3 30 is the only one of the two with measurable performance in the database. Its average benchmark score of 20,137 and 74th percentile ranking give it a concrete position among all tracked CPUs. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has no benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects an absence of data rather than a performance level.
For users who need a processor with verified results, the AMD Ryzen 3 30 is the only choice supported by measurements. It competes closely with established parts like the Intel Core Ultra 7 165U and Intel Core i7-9700K, trailing or leading by less than 1%. The Qualcomm part's specifications indicate higher core count, higher clocks, and wider memory bandwidth, but without benchmark results, those specifications cannot be translated into performance claims.
The AMD Ryzen 3 30 also offers a lower thermal design power of 15 watts against 35 watts for the Qualcomm part, which may matter for system-level power considerations. However, the Qualcomm part's 12 cores and 12 threads versus the AMD part's 4 cores and 8 threads suggest a large theoretical advantage in multi-threaded workloads, if the architecture scales accordingly. The database does not confirm this, as no scores exist for the Qualcomm processor.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in nearly every major specification field. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 2.40 GHz for AMD and 3.80 GHz for Qualcomm. Boost clocks are 4.10 GHz for AMD and 4.20 GHz for Qualcomm. Thermal design power is 15 watts for AMD and 35 watts for Qualcomm. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FT6, while the Qualcomm part uses Qualcomm BGA 2073.
Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. The Qualcomm part has 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and 6 MB of shared L3. Process nodes are 6 nm for AMD and 4 nm for Qualcomm, both at TSMC. Memory support is LPDDR5 for AMD and LPDDR5X for Qualcomm, with bandwidths of 88.0 GB/s and 135.2 GB/s respectively. PCIe generations and lane counts differ: Gen 3 with 4 lanes for AMD, Gen 4 with 12 lanes for Qualcomm. Integrated graphics are the Radeon 610M for AMD and Adreno X1-85 for Qualcomm. The AMD part has a die size of 100 mm², while the Qualcomm die size is not recorded. Release dates are September 30, 2025 for AMD and April 23, 2024 for Qualcomm. The AMD part number is unknown, while the Qualcomm part number is X1E84100.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen 3 30 wins in the only category with recorded data: verified benchmark performance. Its average score of 20,137 places it in the 74th percentile, and it edges out the Intel Core Ultra 7 165U by 0.6% and the Intel Core i7-9700K by 0.7%. It also holds a narrow advantage over the AMD EPYC 7713P, which trails by 0.6%, and the Intel Core i7-11800H, which trails by 0.7%. This suggests the AMD part delivers competitive results for its mobile segment despite having only 4 cores.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 wins on raw specification advantages. It has three times the cores, higher base and boost clocks, double the TDP budget, a smaller process node, wider memory bandwidth, and newer PCIe generation. These specifications point to potential advantages in multi-threaded throughput, memory-intensive tasks, and I/O capability, but the database contains no measurements to confirm these advantages.
In use-case terms, the AMD Ryzen 3 30 is the processor for applications where validated performance is required, such as single-threaded tasks or light multi-threaded workloads, given its 8 threads and 15-watt envelope. The Qualcomm part is positioned for scenarios that demand high core counts and memory bandwidth, based on its specification sheet alone. The data indicates that the Qualcomm part's strengths remain theoretical until benchmark entries are added to the database.