AMD Ryzen 3 30 vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents an unambiguous picture: the Intel Core i5-14490F wins every single recorded head-to-head comparison against the AMD Ryzen 3 30. Across 11 shared PassMark tests, the Intel part claims 11 victories, with the AMD processor recording zero wins. The margins are substantial in every category, ranging from a 36.4% gap in single-threaded work to an 83.6% deficit in prime number computation.

The largest disparity appears in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where the Intel Core i5-14490F scores 122 against the AMD Ryzen 3 30's 20, a delta of -83.6%. This indicates a massive difference in raw integer throughput per core, a result consistent with the Intel processor's higher boost clock and larger core count. Floating point math shows a similar pattern: Intel scores 66,558 versus AMD's 14,448, a -78.3% gap. The physics test, which often reflects sustained multi-core performance, shows Intel at 2,093 against AMD's 436, a -79.2% difference.

In data compression, the Intel Core i5-14490F delivers 340,026 versus the AMD Ryzen 3 30's 135,834, a -60.1% delta. Data encryption follows with Intel at 18,225 and AMD at 6,461, a -64.5% gap. Extended instructions, a measure of SIMD and specialized workload efficiency, shows Intel at 21,731 versus AMD's 6,075, a -72% difference. Integer math results in Intel scoring 87,844 against AMD's 29,846, a -66% gap.

The multi-threaded PassMark score places Intel at 28,662 versus AMD's 9,027, a -68.5% delta. Random string sorting, a memory-latency sensitive test, shows Intel at 35,608 against AMD's 14,431, a -59.5% gap. The single-thread score, the closest of all comparisons, still favors Intel by a wide margin: 3,873 versus 2,465, a -36.4% delta. The average benchmark score across all recorded tests reinforces this hierarchy: the Intel Core i5-14490F averages 38,149, while the AMD Ryzen 3 30 averages 20,137.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 30 does not win any recorded benchmark in this comparison. Every test in the database, from compression to encryption to floating point math, favors the Intel Core i5-14490F. However, the AMD processor does occupy a distinct position in the overall performance distribution. It sits at the 74th percentile of all CPUs in the database, which places it ahead of a majority of processors, even if it trails the Intel part.

The Intel Core i5-14490F sits at the 86th percentile, a higher standing that reflects its dominance in this head-to-head. The AMD Ryzen 3 30's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (average score 20,249, a -0.6% delta), the AMD EPYC 7713P (average score 20,024, a +0.6% delta), the Intel Core i7-9700K (average score 20,271, a -0.7% delta), and the Intel Core i7-11800H (average score 19,998, a +0.7% delta). These figures show the AMD Ryzen 3 30 clustering tightly with older high-end desktop and mobile processors from several generations back.

The Intel Core i5-14490F's nearest rivals are more modern and significantly faster. They include the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (average score 38,194, a -0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-13600KF (average score 38,103, a +0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (average score 38,221, a -0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX (average score 38,261, a -0.3% delta). This places the Intel part in the company of contemporary mid-range and high-end processors, whereas the AMD part competes with older hardware.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in architecture, process technology, and physical design. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 uses the Zen 2 architecture under the Mendocino codename, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die measures 100 mm². The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R codename, Raptor Lake Refresh generation) on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 215 mm².

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 provides 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14490F provides 10 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part more than doubles the core count and doubles the thread count. Base clocks are similar on paper: 2.40 GHz for AMD, 2.50 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks diverge sharply: 4.10 GHz for AMD versus 5.00 GHz for Intel, a difference that explains much of the single-thread performance gap.

Cache hierarchies are also distinct. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 uses 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. The Intel Core i5-14490F uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Intel part's L3 cache is six times larger, which contributes to its advantage in memory-sensitive workloads like random string sorting.

Memory support differs by platform. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 supports LPDDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, though the database does not record a bandwidth figure for it. Neither processor supports ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also differs: the AMD part provides Gen 3 with 4 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen 3 30 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), whereas the Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A. Power envelopes reflect the market positioning: the AMD part is rated at 15 W TDP in the mobile segment, while the Intel part is rated at 65 W TDP in the desktop segment. The AMD processor targets the mobile market segment, while the Intel processor targets the desktop market segment.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 3,873 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the AMD Ryzen 3 30 scores 2,465. This gives the Intel part a -36.4% advantage in that metric.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in the PassMark find prime numbers test. The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 122, while the AMD Ryzen 3 30 scores 20, a -83.6% delta.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38,149, while the AMD Ryzen 3 30 has an average benchmark score of 20,137. The Intel part's average is roughly 89% higher.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 supports LPDDR5 memory, while the Intel Core i5-14490F supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 30 includes Radeon 610M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 30 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads.

The Verdict

The data supports a decisive conclusion: the Intel Core i5-14490F is the superior processor in every measured benchmark. Its 11-0 win record in head-to-head tests, coupled with a 38,149 average score versus 20,137 for the AMD Ryzen 3 30, leaves no ambiguity. The Intel part delivers more than double the multi-threaded performance (28,662 versus 9,027 in PassMark multithread) and holds a significant edge in single-threaded work (3,873 versus 2,465).

The AMD Ryzen 3 30, however, is not without context. Its 74th percentile ranking places it above many CPUs in the database, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-9700K and Intel Core i7-11800H, both of which were high-end parts in their time. The AMD processor's 15 W TDP and mobile market segment suggest a design priority for power efficiency rather than raw throughput, and its integrated graphics provide functionality that the Intel desktop part lacks entirely.

For scenarios where processing power is the sole criterion, the Intel Core i5-14490F is the clear choice. Its 10 cores, 16 threads, 5.00 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB of L3 cache give it advantages that the AMD Ryzen 3 30 cannot offset. The AMD part may serve a different purpose in low-power mobile systems, but within this recorded data set, it loses every benchmark comparison. The verdict is unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-14490F wins on all measured performance metrics.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 30 | Intel Core i5-14490F |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 10 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.40 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.10 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FT6 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 2 | Raptor Lake |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 100 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | LPDDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 88.0 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 4 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M | N/A |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2023-12-31 |

| Part Number | Unknown | SRN35 |