AMD Ryzen 3 30 vs Intel Core 7 253PTE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 30 and Intel Core 7 253PTE occupy different corners of the processor market, and the benchmark data reflects a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel part, a desktop chip with more cores and a higher thermal envelope, dominates the recorded PassMark tests. The AMD processor, a mobile-focused part, offers a more power-efficient design but trails in nearly every measurable workload. This analysis compares the two based strictly on recorded database measurements.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 7 253PTE wins all 11 recorded head-to-head benchmark comparisons against the AMD Ryzen 3 30. The margin varies by workload, but the pattern is consistent: Intel’s chip delivers substantially higher raw performance across the board.

The largest single-test gap appears in floating-point math, where the Intel part scores 67,209 versus the AMD’s 14,448, a difference of 78.5 percent. Integer math shows a similar story: 119,552 for Intel versus 29,846 for AMD, a 75 percent deficit for the Ryzen. In data compression, Intel scores 275,828 against AMD’s 135,834, a 50.8 percent gap. The encryption test shows Intel at 15,500 versus AMD’s 6,461, a 58.3 percent lead.

Multithreaded performance also heavily favors Intel. The Core 7 253PTE scores 25,031 in the PassMark multithread test, while the Ryzen 3 30 manages 9,027, a 63.9 percent difference. The physics test follows the same trend: Intel’s 1,318 versus AMD’s 436, a 66.9 percent margin. Extended instruction workloads show Intel at 17,099 and AMD at 6,075, a 64.5 percent gap. Prime number finding is also lopsided, with Intel scoring 82 versus AMD’s 20, a 75.6 percent difference.

Even in single-threaded performance, where the AMD chip’s higher base clock (2.40 GHz versus 1.80 GHz) might suggest competitiveness, Intel wins decisively. The Core 7 253PTE scores 3,794 in the single-thread test, while the Ryzen 3 30 scores 2,465, a 35 percent lead for Intel. Random string sorting is the closest contest, but Intel still wins: 28,227 versus 14,431, a 48.9 percent advantage.

The average benchmark score for the Intel part is 34,962, which places it at the 84th percentile among all CPUs in the database. The AMD part averages 20,137, landing at the 74th percentile. Intel’s nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-13800H with an average score of 34,988, a delta of -0.1 percent, meaning the Core 7 253PTE is essentially tied with that part. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 sits close to the Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, which scores 20,249, a delta of -0.6 percent.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 uses the Zen 2 architecture with the Mendocino codename, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 253PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. The process nodes are not directly comparable, as they are measured by different manufacturers, but the recorded data shows Intel’s larger process still delivers far higher performance.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The AMD chip has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel chip has 10 cores and 20 threads. This 2.5x core advantage and 2.5x thread advantage aligns with the multithreaded benchmark results. The Intel part also has a much larger cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core versus 64 KB, 2 MB of L2 per core versus 512 KB, and 33 MB of shared L3 versus 4 MB. The larger L3 cache is particularly relevant for data-heavy workloads.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 supports LPDDR5 memory with a recorded bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s. The Intel Core 7 253PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a slightly higher bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both are dual-channel, but the Intel part also supports ECC memory, which the AMD chip does not.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD processor provides PCIe Gen 3 with 4 CPU lanes, while the Intel processor offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. This gives the Intel part far more bandwidth for expansion cards and storage devices.

The Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 730 as integrated graphics, while the AMD chip features Radeon 610M. Both are integrated solutions, but no graphics benchmarks are recorded in the database for either processor.

The market segments are also distinct. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 is classified as a mobile processor, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE is a desktop part. This explains the TDP difference: 15 watts for AMD versus 45 watts for Intel. The higher power budget enables the Intel chip’s higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus AMD’s 4.10 GHz.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-threaded score?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE scores 3,794 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the AMD Ryzen 3 30 scores 2,465. Intel leads by 35 percent.

Q: How much faster is the Intel chip in multithreaded workloads?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE scores 25,031 in the PassMark multithread test versus 9,027 for the AMD Ryzen 3 30, a 63.9 percent advantage.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 30 has an average benchmark score of 20,137, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE averages 34,962.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core 7 253PTE supports ECC memory, but the AMD Ryzen 3 30 does not.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 3 30 has 4 MB.

Q: What is the PCIe generation for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 30 uses PCIe Gen 3 with 4 CPU lanes. The Intel Core 7 253PTE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification category. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE has 10 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are 2.40 GHz for AMD and 1.80 GHz for Intel, but boost clocks are 4.10 GHz and 5.40 GHz, respectively. The TDP is 15 watts for AMD and 45 watts for Intel.

The socket types are incompatible: AMD uses Socket FT6, while Intel uses Socket 1700. The AMD chip is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 100 mm². The Intel chip uses a 10 nm process at Intel, and its die size is not recorded in the database.

Cache configurations vary substantially. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3.

Memory support differs: AMD uses LPDDR5 only, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bus is dual-channel for both, with bandwidths of 88.0 GB/s for AMD and 89.6 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory is available only on the Intel part.

PCIe capabilities are different as well: AMD offers Gen 3 with 4 lanes, Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The integrated graphics are Radeon 610M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel.

The market segments differ (mobile versus desktop), as do release dates: the AMD part was released on 2025-09-30, and the Intel part on 2026-03-08. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 253PTE wins in every recorded benchmark category. Its performance advantages are most pronounced in floating-point math, where it leads by 78.5 percent, and in integer math, where it leads by 75 percent. These results indicate strong suitability for compute-heavy desktop tasks such as scientific calculations, video encoding, and complex simulations. The 10-core, 20-thread configuration with 33 MB of L3 cache gives it a decisive edge in multithreaded workloads, including data compression and encryption.

The AMD Ryzen 3 30, despite losing all head-to-head tests, has strengths that are not captured in the PassMark suite. Its 15-watt TDP and mobile market classification suggest it targets power-sensitive devices like thin laptops and portable systems. The 6 nm process and LPDDR5 memory support point toward energy efficiency rather than raw throughput. In the database, its average score of 20,137 places it in the 74th percentile, meaning it outperforms most CPUs in the broader dataset, just not the Intel competitor here.

For single-threaded tasks, the Intel chip’s 35 percent lead in the single-thread test makes it the better choice for responsiveness in everyday desktop applications. The AMD chip’s lower boost clock and fewer cores limit its appeal for performance-focused users. The Intel chip’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes also provides a superior foundation for discrete GPUs and high-speed storage, a factor that matters for desktop builders.

The AMD chip’s only potential advantage lies in its power envelope and mobile form factor. With a 15-watt TDP, it is designed for battery-operated devices where sustained performance is secondary to efficiency. The Intel chip, with a 45-watt TDP and desktop socket, is built for plugged-in performance with fewer thermal constraints. The recorded data shows no benchmark where the AMD chip wins, so any use-case advantage must come from platform characteristics outside the tested workloads.