AMD Ryzen 3 30 vs Intel Core 5 211TE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 30 and Intel Core 5 211TE occupy very different positions in the processor market. The Ryzen 3 30 is a 15-watt mobile part built on a 6 nm process, while the Core 5 211TE is a 45-watt desktop chip on Intel’s 10 nm node. Benchmark data shows a clear split: the AMD chip dominates single-threaded performance, while the Intel part wins heavily in multi-threaded and compute-heavy workloads. The recorded measurements place the Ryzen 3 30 at the 74th percentile among all CPUs, with the Core 5 211TE at the 69th percentile, yet their average benchmark scores tell a different story, with Intel holding a higher overall average.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 30 scores 2465 in the PassMark single-thread test, which is 75.1% higher than the Intel Core 5 211TE’s score of 1408.

Q: How do the two compare in multithreaded performance?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE scores 11685 in the PassMark multithread test, which is 22.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 30’s score of 9027.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 30 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 3 30 does not.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 30 has a memory bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What is the release date and launch MSRP of the Intel Core 5 211TE?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE was released on 2025-01-12 and has a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 was released on 2025-09-30.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 30 wins in three of the eleven recorded head-to-head tests. Its most significant victory is in single-threaded performance, where it leads by 75.1% in both PassMark single-thread and single-thread tests. It also edges out the Intel part in data compression, scoring 135834 versus 133434, a margin of 1.8%. This makes the Ryzen 3 30 the better choice for lightly threaded applications, responsiveness, and workloads that depend on per-core speed.

The Intel Core 5 211TE wins eight of the eleven head-to-head tests. Its largest margins come in prime number finding, physics, and floating-point math, where it leads by 72.2%, 65.9%, and 44.7% respectively. It also wins in extended instructions by 29.5%, multithread by 22.7%, integer math by 12.2%, data encryption by 10.6%, and random string sorting by 2.7%. The data clearly indicates that the Intel part is the stronger choice for parallel compute, scientific workloads, and any task that scales with core count.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 30 uses the Zen 2 architecture under the Mendocino codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has a die size of 100 mm². The Intel Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². These process and design choices explain the significant differences in power draw and thermal characteristics, with the AMD part rated at 15 watts TDP and the Intel part at 45 watts.

Cache configurations differ substantially between the two. The Ryzen 3 30 provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 211TE provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 cache on the Intel part contributes to its strong showing in cache-sensitive workloads like random string sorting and data compression, where the margin is slim at 2.7% and 1.8% respectively.

Memory support also differs. The AMD chip supports LPDDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel. Despite the AMD part’s higher memory bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s, the Intel part’s larger core count and cache compensate in most multi-threaded benchmarks. The Intel part also supports ECC memory, which the AMD part lacks. PCIe capabilities differ as well, with the AMD part offering Gen 3 with 4 lanes and the Intel part offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are the most obvious difference. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads. The base clock of the AMD part is 2.40 GHz, compared to 1.70 GHz for the Intel part. The boost clock reverses this, with the Intel part reaching 4.80 GHz versus 4.10 GHz for the AMD part.

TDP ratings differ by a factor of three. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 is rated at 15 watts, while the Intel Core 5 211TE is rated at 45 watts. The sockets are incompatible, with the AMD part using AMD Socket FT6 and the Intel part using Intel Socket 1700. The market segments reflect this: the AMD part is classified as Mobile, while the Intel part is Desktop.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 uses Radeon 610M graphics, while the Intel Core 5 211TE uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part has a smaller die at 100 mm², while the Intel part is over twice as large at 215 mm². The Intel part is not multiplier unlocked, and neither is the AMD part. The Intel part has a known part number of SRQDL, while the AMD part’s part number is listed as unknown.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single-thread test shows the starkest contrast between the two processors. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 scores 2465, while the Intel Core 5 211TE scores 1408, giving the AMD part a 75.1% lead. This is the largest margin in either direction across all recorded benchmarks. It indicates that for everyday responsiveness, light browsing, and single-threaded applications, the AMD part has a commanding advantage despite its lower core count.

The Intel Core 5 211TE responds with decisive wins in compute-heavy tests. In the find prime numbers test, it scores 72 against the AMD part’s 20, a 72.2% lead. The physics test shows a similar pattern, with Intel scoring 1278 versus 436, a 65.9% margin. Floating-point math gives Intel a 44.7% lead, scoring 26150 against 14448. These results align with the Intel part’s higher core count and larger cache.

The extended instructions test favors Intel by 29.5%, with scores of 8615 versus 6075. Multithread performance favors Intel by 22.7%, at 11685 versus 9027. Integer math gives Intel a 12.2% lead, scoring 33991 against 29846. Data encryption favors Intel by 10.6%, at 7231 versus 6461. Random string sorting is the closest Intel win, at 14838 versus 14431, a 2.7% margin.

The AMD Ryzen 3 30 also wins the data compression test, scoring 135834 against 133434, a 1.8% lead. This is the only benchmark besides single-thread where the AMD part comes out ahead. The overall benchmark averages reflect the Intel part’s broader strength, with the Core 5 211TE averaging 15370 against the Ryzen 3 30’s 20137. The Intel part’s nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7543 and AMD EPYC 7702P, while the AMD part’s rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 165U and Intel Core i7-9700K.

The Verdict

The data presents two distinct usage profiles. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 is the pick for single-threaded performance, delivering a 75.1% advantage in the single-thread benchmark and a small win in data compression. Its 15-watt TDP, 6 nm process, and mobile classification make it suitable for power-constrained environments. Its 88.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and LPDDR5 support are strengths, though its 4-core, 8-thread configuration limits its multi-threaded ceiling.

The Intel Core 5 211TE is the pick for parallel compute. It wins eight of eleven benchmarks, with particularly large margins in prime number finding, physics, and floating-point math. Its 10 cores, 16 threads, 20 MB of L3 cache, and 45-watt TDP deliver substantially higher throughput in multi-threaded workloads. The 22.7% multithread lead and 29.5% extended instructions lead make it the stronger option for rendering, scientific computation, and heavily threaded productivity tasks. ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes add further suitability for workstation-class use. The Ryzen 3 30’s higher percentile ranking and average score do not outweigh the Intel part’s consistent wins where core count matters most.