AMD Ryzen 3 30 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 30 and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX are extreme opposites in AMD’s lineup, separated by 60 cores, 120 threads, and an order of magnitude in physical scale, yet both sit at the 74th percentile of all CPUs tracked. The Ryzen 3 30 is a 4-core, 8-thread Mendocino mobile part built for low-power LPDDR5 laptops, while the Threadripper PRO 5995WX is a 64-core, 128-thread Chagall PRO workstation monster with eight-channel DDR4 and 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Both chips post nearly identical average benchmark scores—20,137 for the Ryzen 3 30 versus 19,928 for the Threadripper—but they achieve that parity through completely different workloads: the Ryzen 3 30 leans on single-thread and light-thread efficiency, while the Threadripper dominates anything that scales across its massive core count. The data shows these are not competitors; they are solutions for mutually exclusive use cases, and the right pick depends entirely on whether your work is latency-sensitive and portable or throughput-hungry and stationary.

The Verdict

Pick the AMD Ryzen 3 30 if your priority is a compact, efficient mobile system where single-thread responsiveness matters more than raw parallel throughput. Its 4-core Zen 2 design with a 15W TDP and Radeon 610M integrated graphics is built for thin-and-light laptops, and its benchmark profile confirms this: it scores 2,465 in PassMark single-thread tests, which is 26.6% higher than the Threadripper’s 1,947 Geekbench single-core score. The Ryzen 3 30 also wins the data compression test decisively, scoring 135,834 versus the Threadripper’s absence from that benchmark, and it does so while drawing a fraction of the power. If you need a capable everyday machine for web browsing, office work, and light content creation, the Ryzen 3 30 is the practical choice.

Pick the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX if your workloads are heavily multithreaded and you have the budget for a serious workstation. The 64-core, 128-thread Zen 3 part is an absolute beast in render and compute tasks, as shown by its Cinebench results: 81,175 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 34,093 in R20 multi-core, and 8,182 in R15 multi-core. These numbers dwarf anything a 4-core chip can produce, and the Threadripper’s 256MB of L3 cache and 204.8 GB/s memory bandwidth provide the headroom for data-heavy professional applications. The benchmark results indicate that if your software scales to 128 threads, the Threadripper PRO 5995WX is the only rational option. Its launch MSRP is $6499, which reflects its workstation positioning.

Architecture Differences

The two CPUs are separated by two generations of Zen architecture and fundamentally different design philosophies. The Ryzen 3 30 uses Zen 2 architecture on a 6nm process node from TSMC, with a die size of 100 mm². It is built around 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The Threadripper PRO 5995WX, by contrast, uses Zen 3 architecture on a 7nm node, consisting of 8 separate 81 mm² dies (8x 81 mm²) totaling 33,200 million transistors. It packs 64 cores and 128 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Cache hierarchies differ dramatically. The Ryzen 3 30 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and just 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Threadripper PRO 5995WX also has 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, but its L3 cache is a massive 256 MB—64 times larger than the Ryzen 3 30’s. Memory support is equally divergent: the Ryzen 3 30 uses dual-channel LPDDR5 with 88.0 GB/s bandwidth and no ECC support, while the Threadripper uses eight-channel DDR4 with 204.8 GB/s bandwidth and full ECC support. PCIe capabilities are also worlds apart: the Ryzen 3 30 offers Gen 3 with 4 lanes, whereas the Threadripper provides Gen 4 with 128 lanes. The Ryzen 3 30 includes integrated Radeon 610M graphics; the Threadripper has none, requiring a discrete GPU.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are limited because the two CPUs were tested under different suites, but the available data paints a clear picture of their strengths. The Ryzen 3 30’s PassMark suite shows a single-thread score of 2,465, which is strong for a mobile chip. Its multi-thread score of 9,027 is far lower than the Threadripper’s Cinebench multi-core results, but that is expected given the 16x core count difference. The Ryzen 3 30’s data compression score of 135,834 is its standout result, indicating excellent performance in compression workloads that are often single-threaded or lightly threaded.

The Threadripper PRO 5995WX’s Cinebench scores are the headline numbers here. Its R23 multi-core score of 81,175 is roughly 9 times higher than the Ryzen 3 30’s PassMark multi-thread score, and its R20 multi-core result of 34,093 confirms scaling that a 4-core chip cannot approach. However, the Threadripper’s single-core performance is notably weaker relative to its multi-core might: its Geekbench single-core score of 1,947 is 26.6% lower than the Ryzen 3 30’s PassMark single-thread score of 2,465. This gap reflects both the architectural differences and the Threadripper’s lower per-core boost frequency relative to its core count. The Threadripper’s Geekbench multi-core score of 16,598 is also modest compared to its Cinebench numbers, showing that different benchmarks stress the chip in different ways.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 30 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 64 |

| Threads | 8 | 128 |

| Base Clock | 2.40 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.10 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 15W | 280W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FT6 | AMD Socket WRX8 |

| Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 3 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |

| Die Size | 100 mm² | 8x 81 mm² |

| Transistors | Not listed | 33,200 million |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB (shared) | 256 MB |

| Memory Support | LPDDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Eight-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 88.0 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 4 Lanes | Gen 4, 128 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M | None |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2022-03-07 |

| Part Number | unknown | 100-000000444 |

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has better single-thread performance?

A: The Ryzen 3 30 scores 2,465 in PassMark single-thread, which is 26.6% higher than the Threadripper PRO 5995WX’s Geekbench single-core score of 1,947.

Q: How much larger is the Threadripper’s L3 cache?

A: The Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 256 MB of L3 cache, which is 64 times larger than the Ryzen 3 30’s 4 MB shared L3.

Q: Does the Threadripper support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Threadripper PRO 5995WX supports ECC memory with its eight-channel DDR4 interface. The Ryzen 3 30 does not support ECC memory.

Q: Which CPU has integrated graphics?

A: The Ryzen 3 30 includes Radeon 610M integrated graphics. The Threadripper PRO 5995WX has no integrated graphics and requires a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Ryzen 3 30 has a TDP of 15W, while the Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a TDP of 280W—an 18.7x difference.

Q: Which CPU has more PCIe lanes?

A: The Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, compared to the Ryzen 3 30’s 4 PCIe Gen 3 lanes.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Ryzen 3 30 wins in:

• Single-thread workloads: Its PassMark single-thread score of 2,465 beats the Threadripper’s 1,947 Geekbench single-core score by 26.6%.
• Data compression: Its PassMark data compression score of 135,834 is a standout result, and the Threadripper has no comparable benchmark in its suite.
• Power efficiency: At 15W TDP versus 280W, the Ryzen 3 30 is in a completely different power class, making it suitable for battery-powered laptops.
• Integrated graphics: The Radeon 610M provides basic display output without a discrete GPU, which the Threadripper cannot do.
• Portability: Its AMD Socket FT6, mobile market segment, and LPDDR5 memory support make it the only choice for thin-and-light systems.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX wins in:

• Multi-threaded throughput: Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 81,175 and R20 score of 34,093 demonstrate extreme scaling that the 4-core Ryzen 3 30 cannot approach.
• Memory bandwidth: With 204.8 GB/s over eight-channel DDR4, the Threadripper has 2.3x the memory bandwidth of the Ryzen 3 30’s 88.0 GB/s.
• Cache capacity: The 256 MB L3 cache is 64x larger than the Ryzen 3 30’s 4 MB, benefiting large datasets and server workloads.
• I/O expansion: 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes enable massive GPU and NVMe configurations, while the Ryzen 3 30 is limited to 4 Gen 3 lanes.
• Reliability features: ECC memory support makes the Threadripper suitable for error-sensitive compute tasks.
• Core count scalability: 64 cores and 128 threads dominate any workload that can utilize them, from rendering to scientific computing.