AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE vs Intel Core i5-7500T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a decisive picture: the AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE wins every single recorded head-to-head comparison against the Intel Core i5-7500T. Across six Cinebench tests, spanning three different versions of the benchmark, the AMD part holds a consistent advantage in both multi-core and single-core workloads.

The closest margin appears in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the Ryzen 3 2200GE scores 71 against the Intel's 63, a delta of 11.3%. The multi-core gap in the same benchmark is nearly identical: 503 versus 448, a 10.9% difference. This pattern repeats through the newer benchmark versions. In Cinebench R20, the AMD chip posts 296 single-core and 2097 multi-core, compared to Intel's 263 and 1870, with deltas of 11.1% and 10.8% respectively. The R23 results follow suit: 705 versus 628 single-core (10.9% delta) and 4993 versus 4454 multi-core (10.8% delta).

The consistency of the delta percentages is striking. The AMD processor is not winning by a fluke in one specific test; it maintains a roughly 11% lead across every iteration of the Cinebench suite. This suggests a fundamental performance advantage that scales with both thread count and clock speed.

The overall average benchmark score tells a slightly different story. The Intel i5-7500T has an average score of 1483, while the Ryzen 3 2200GE sits at 1444. This discrepancy is explained by the different benchmark sets: the Intel database entry includes Geekbench scores (3062 multi-core, 1078 single-core), while the AMD entry's average is calculated from the Cinebench results only. The head-to-head data, which uses identical tests, is the more reliable comparison, and it is uniformly in favor of AMD.

The Ryzen 3 2200GE also has a higher percentile ranking relative to all CPUs, matching the Intel at the 38th percentile. This indicates both processors occupy a similar tier in the broader landscape, but within their direct matchup, the AMD part is the clear aggressor.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE wins with a score of 4993, compared to the Intel Core i5-7500T's 4454, a difference of 10.8%.

Q: Is the single-core performance gap similar to the multi-core gap?

A: Yes, the single-core deltas are very close to the multi-core deltas. In Cinebench R20, the single-core gap is 11.1% (296 vs 263), and the multi-core gap is 10.8% (2097 vs 1870).

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-7500T has an average benchmark score of 1483. The AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE has an average score of 1444. Note that these averages are drawn from different test sets, so the head-to-head figures are more directly comparable.

Q: Does the Intel processor win any of the head-to-head benchmark tests?

A: No. The recorded data shows the AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE winning all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, with the Intel processor recording zero wins.

Q: What are the closest rival scores for each CPU?

A: For the Intel i5-7500T, the closest rival is the Intel Core i5-5575R with an average score of 1478, a delta of 0.4%. For the AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE, the closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G with an average score of 1439, a delta of 0.4%.

Q: Are both processors still in active production?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i5-7500T and the AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE have a production status of "Active" in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies despite sharing several surface-level specifications. Both are built on a 14 nm process node, but the Intel part is manufactured by Intel's own foundry, while the AMD chip is produced by GlobalFoundries. This distinction in fabrication is a significant architectural divergence.

The Intel Core i5-7500T is based on the Kaby Lake architecture, a refinement of Intel's mainstream design. It features 4 cores and 4 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 3.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy is organized as 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1151 and supports DDR4 memory over a dual-channel bus, with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE, by contrast, is built on the Zen architecture with the codename Raven Ridge. It also has 4 cores and 4 threads, but operates at higher clocks: 3.20 GHz base and 3.60 GHz boost. Its cache layout is different, with 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a smaller 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part uses the AMD Socket AM4 and also supports dual-channel DDR4 memory, but with a higher theoretical memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s. Its PCIe implementation is more limited, offering Gen 3 with only 8 CPU lanes.

The integrated graphics differ substantially. The Intel i5-7500T includes HD 630 graphics, while the AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE features Radeon Vega 8. The AMD chip also includes a much larger physical footprint, with a die size of 210 mm² and 4,950 million transistors, whereas the Intel part has no listed transistor count or die size in the database. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking, while the Intel part's multiplier is locked.

Specification Differences

A direct comparison of the specification sheets reveals several key differences between the two processors. The most obvious is the clock speed: the AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE runs at a 3.20 GHz base and 3.60 GHz boost, while the Intel Core i5-7500T runs at 2.70 GHz base and 3.30 GHz boost. This 0.5 GHz base clock advantage for AMD likely contributes to its single-core benchmark wins.

The cache configuration is another clear distinction. The Intel part has a larger L3 cache at 6 MB shared, compared to AMD's 4 MB shared. However, the AMD chip has larger L1 and L2 caches per core: 96 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 versus Intel's 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2. This trade-off between L3 capacity and per-core cache may explain the performance profile.

Memory bandwidth is also different, with AMD specifying 46.9 GB/s versus Intel's 38.4 GB/s. Both support dual-channel DDR4, but the AMD controller appears to provide higher theoretical throughput. The PCIe lane count differs as well: Intel provides 16 CPU lanes, while AMD provides 8, all Gen 3 in both cases.

The sockets are incompatible: Intel uses Socket 1151, while AMD uses Socket AM4. The release dates are separated by over a year, with Intel launching on 2017-01-02 and AMD on 2018-04-18. The AMD part is part of the 2000 series generation, while the Intel part is from the Kaby Lake generation. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier, a feature absent on the Intel chip. Finally, the part numbers differ: the Intel is SR337, while the AMD uses a longer identifier.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE outperforms the Intel Core i5-7500T in every recorded head-to-head test. The consistent 10.8% to 11.3% deltas across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, in both single-core and multi-core modes, indicate a thorough and repeatable advantage. The AMD part also offers higher base and boost clocks, greater memory bandwidth, and an unlocked multiplier for potential overclocking.

However, the Intel part has its own merits. It features a larger L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB) and twice the PCIe lanes (16 vs 8), which could be relevant for certain workloads involving heavy I/O or specific cache-sensitive applications. The Intel processor also has a slightly higher average benchmark score in the database (1483 vs 1444), though this is due to the inclusion of Geekbench results in its average, which are not present in the AMD entry's average.

For a user prioritizing raw CPU performance in rendering or general compute tasks, the AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE is the clear choice based on the data. The consistent Cinebench wins suggest it will handle multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads alike with greater speed. For a user who values the higher PCIe lane count or the larger L3 cache, the Intel i5-7500T may hold appeal, but the benchmark results do not show this translating into any performance win in the tested scenarios.

The percentile ranking is identical at 38 for both, placing them in the same overall performance tier. Within that tier, the AMD part is demonstrably faster. The verdict is straightforward: the data favors AMD.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark results give AMD a clean sweep, but the specification differences suggest potential strengths for each processor in distinct use cases.

The AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE wins in all CPU-intensive rendering benchmarks. Its higher clock speeds (3.20 GHz base, 3.60 GHz boost) and superior memory bandwidth (46.9 GB/s) likely contribute to its 10.8% lead in multi-core Cinebench R23 (4993 vs 4454) and its 10.9% lead in single-core R23 (705 vs 628). For tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or any workload that scales with CPU throughput, the AMD part is the stronger performer. The unlocked multiplier also gives it a flexibility advantage for users who wish to push beyond stock clocks.

The Intel Core i5-7500T, despite losing every benchmark, has attributes that could favor it in specific scenarios. Its 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, twice the AMD's 8, could be advantageous for systems with multiple high-bandwidth expansion cards, such as multiple NVMe drives or specialized I/O cards. The larger 6 MB L3 cache, compared to AMD's 4 MB, might benefit certain cache-sensitive workloads, although the benchmark data does not show this translating into a win in the Cinebench suite. The Intel part also has a lower base clock, which could theoretically lead to lower power draw in idle states, though both are rated at 35 W TDP.

In a practical sense, the data suggests that for the vast majority of general-purpose computing, the AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE is the superior choice. The Intel i5-7500T's potential advantages are in niche areas not covered by the benchmark suite, such as specific I/O configurations or legacy software optimizations. For any user looking at the recorded benchmark numbers, AMD is the winner in every measurable CPU performance category.